---

name: worlddev-workflow description: Use when deciding which worlddev-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a World Development (WD) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

World Development Workflow Router (worlddev-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which worlddev- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at World Development (WD) — the multidisciplinary development-studies journal published by Elsevier (founded 1973, monthly, ISSN 0305-750X / online 1873-5991). WD's defining feature, and the thing every routing decision must respect, is that it is methodologically pluralist: it publishes econometric and experimental work, but equally qualitative case studies, process tracing, ethnography, participatory methods, political-economy analysis, and policy/practice papers. The shared bar is real-world development relevance in low- and middle-income contexts — poverty, inequality, livelihoods, institutions, governance, aid and NGOs, agriculture and food security, health and education, conflict, gender, and environment-development.

The single biggest router mistake is treating WD as if it were an econometrics journal. It is not. Route a regression-discontinuity paper and a multi-site qualitative study through the same chain, but enter the chain at different links and apply a different bar for "credible evidence." Editors as of 2026: Jampel Dell'Angelo and Angelika Rettberg (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Review is double-anonymized; submission is via Elsevier Editorial Manager; abstract ≤250 words, 3–6 keywords.

When to trigger

• The user asks "what should I do next?" on a WD-targeted draft
• A draft is ping-ponging between framing, evidence, exhibits, and submission checks
• The contribution is unclear relative to siblings (JDE, WBER, JDS, EDCC)
• A WD decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
• A quantitatively-trained author has a qualitative or mixed-methods paper and is unsure how WD will judge it

Routing table

Current symptom	Next skill
Scope/audience/outlet fit uncertain; is this WD or a sibling?	worlddev-topic-selection
Contribution vs. the development literature is fuzzy or undersold	worlddev-literature-positioning
Causal claim rests on OLS+controls; or a qual/mixed claim lacks an inference logic	worlddev-identification
The conceptual/analytical framework (development theory) is loose or decorative	worlddev-theory-model
Results may be specification-, sample-, measurement-, or interpretation-sensitive	worlddev-robustness
Exhibits dense; significance asterisks present; maps/qual evidence underused	worlddev-tables-figures
Prose is jargon-heavy and does not reach a multidisciplinary, policy audience	worlddev-writing-style
Data/code deposit, qualitative-transparency, or anonymization for review	worlddev-replication-package
Likely double-anonymized referee objections should be pre-empted	worlddev-referee-strategy
Close to submission; need the Editorial Manager preflight	worlddev-submission
An R&R or reject-and-resubmit arrived; need a response-letter plan	worlddev-rebuttal

Default order

1. worlddev-topic-selection — lock the development question and WD-vs-sibling fit
2. worlddev-literature-positioning — stake the contribution across disciplines
3. worlddev-identification — causal design OR the inference logic of a qual/mixed paper
4. worlddev-theory-model — the conceptual/analytical framework that organizes the evidence
5. worlddev-robustness — sensitivity (quant) or trustworthiness/triangulation (qual)
6. worlddev-tables-figures — exhibits, maps, and qualitative displays without asterisks
7. worlddev-writing-style — reach the multidisciplinary reader (abstract + intro last)
8. worlddev-replication-package — Elsevier data policy + qualitative transparency
9. worlddev-referee-strategy — anticipate double-anonymized objections
10. worlddev-submission — Editorial Manager preflight
11. worlddev-rebuttal — after the decision letter

Writing-style is late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the framework and evidence settle.

Routing by paper archetype

The binding constraint differs by what kind of paper this is. Read the archetype, then enter at the right link.

Archetype	Likely first bottleneck	Enter at
Quantitative causal (DID, IV, RDD, RCT)	credible design + clustering at the right level	worlddev-identification
Qualitative (cases, process tracing, ethnography)	inference logic + transparency, not "more N"	worlddev-identification → worlddev-theory-model
Mixed-methods	integration — how strands actually combine, not run in parallel	worlddev-theory-model → worlddev-identification
Political-economy / institutional analysis	conceptual framework doing real analytical work	worlddev-theory-model
Policy / practice / aid-effectiveness	"so what for whom" + external validity	worlddev-topic-selection → worlddev-writing-style

Anti-patterns

• Treating WD as interchangeable with Journal of Development Economics (rigorous development econometrics) — WD values relevance and methodological breadth, not only identification rigor
• Treating WD as World Bank Economic Review (Bank-affiliated, more economics-centric) or Journal of Development Studies (interdisciplinary but more political/sociological framing)
• Routing a qualitative paper as if "weak identification" were the problem when the real problem is an unstated inference logic
• Polishing prose before the framework, evidence hierarchy, and contribution are stable
• Letting an appendix carry claims the main text must establish

Output format

【Target】World Development (WD)
【Archetype】quant-causal / qualitative / mixed / political-economy / policy-practice
【Current bottleneck】fit / contribution / design / framework / evidence / exhibits / style / replication / submission / revision
【Next skill】<one worlddev-* skill>
【Reason】why this is the binding constraint for THIS archetype
【Source check】official facts verified or marked 待核实