计划执行与检查节点
executing-plans
按既定实施计划完成工作,保持过程检查和反馈。
finman-tables-figures【效率与协作】Use when building or revising the exhibits of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript so the main finance result and its economic magnitude are legible at a glance and respect Wiley/finance house norms. Formats exhibits; it does not establish the result (finman-identification / finman-robustness) or write the surrounding prose.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
FM's brand is "articles that people actually read," and that taste extends to the tables. The main causal or economic estimate should be findable in seconds, and — because FM weighs practical relevance — every headline exhibit should make the economic magnitude legible, not just the t-statistic. Finance house style permits significance stars but requires standard errors in parentheses; report the dependent-variable mean so a reader can scale the coefficient into a managerial quantity. The journal's "less weight on trivial robustness" stance also shapes the exhibit set: do not pad the main paper with specification-sweep tables — promote the one headline table and the one identification figure, and demote the rest.
| Exhibit | What it must show | Common failure |
|---|---|---|
| Summary stats / Table 1 | sample, key variable means, SDs, N | no attrition or sample line |
| Main results table | headline coefficient, SE in parentheses, N, dep-var mean, controls flagged | 12 columns; magnitude not interpretable |
| Event-study figure | leads + lags, CIs, reference period, flat pre-trends | no CIs; ambiguous reference period |
| First-stage / IV table | first-stage F, exclusion logic in notes | weak first stage hidden in an appendix |
| Portfolio sort / factor table (AP) | spreads, factor-adjusted alphas, t-stats, costs | gross-only returns; no factor adjustment |
| Economic-magnitude exhibit | effect scaled to SD, dollars, or a managerial unit | only statistical significance reported |
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers. Full map:
execution-with-mcp. Financial Management is empirical corporate finance + asset pricing; corporate-causal chain (DiD/IV/RDD) plus the factor-zoo haircut for cross-sectional pricing.
etable (multi-model) or did_summary_to_latex straight from the result_id.plot_from_result / enhanced_event_study_plot / event_study_table —
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the JF execution walkthrough.
Because FM weights practical relevance, the single highest-return exhibit edit is making the economic size legible. Three reliable ways:
A draft's Table 4 sweeps every control combination across 12 columns, the headline is in column 9 with only t-stats, and nothing tells a reader the size of the effect. The FM fix: promote the preferred specification to a two-panel Table 3 (Panel A baseline, Panel B full controls), each with the coefficient 3.1 (s.e. 0.9 in parentheses), N, and the dependent-variable mean 0.44; add a one-line note that a one-SD rise in the regressor implies a ~7% increase relative to the mean (illustrative); move the sweep to the internet appendix; and add Figure 1, the event-study with CIs and a marked reference period. The result is now findable, identified, and economically legible.
A few presentation details are set by the publisher rather than the field, and they save a copyediting round if handled early:
【Headline exhibit】one table carrying the main estimate? [Y/N]
【Inference shown】SEs in parentheses + clustering in notes? [Y/N]; stars defined if used
【Economic magnitude】effect scaled to a managerial/market unit? [Y/N]
【Identification figure】event-study / first-stage / sorts present with CIs? [Y/N]
【Self-contained notes】sample/units/clustering/controls/period in every note? [Y/N]
【Lean set】sweeps demoted to internet appendix? [Y/N]
【Next skill】finman-internet-appendix