界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
效率与协作 · SKILL.md

audit-training-experiment

audit-training-experiment

【效率与协作】Audits an ML training experiment for reproducibility, evidence integrity, leakage, checkpoint identity, evaluation validity, and overclaimed conclusions. Use before accepting results, spending on a longer run, publishing artifacts, or handing work to another agent.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: audit-training-experiment description: Audits an ML training experiment for reproducibility, evidence integrity, leakage, checkpoint identity, evaluation validity, and overclaimed conclusions. Use before accepting results, spending on a longer run, publishing artifacts, or handing work to another agent.

Audit Training Experiment

Audit the claim against the preserved evidence. Do not regenerate missing evidence during the audit unless explicitly asked; identify the gap.

Reconstruct the experiment

Verify that the record contains:

  • hypothesis, acceptance and stop gates, scope, and explicit non-claims;
  • source and dataset revisions, split manifests, provenance, licenses, and hashes;
  • generator, teacher, prompt, schema, validator, tokenizer, and model revisions;
  • exact command/configuration, seed, packages, hardware, runtime, memory, and cost;
  • complete logs, checkpoint inventory, best metric and checkpoint identity;
  • raw held-out outputs, normalized outputs, per-case validation, and latency.

Confirm that preserved hashes match current artifacts. Distinguish unavailable evidence from failed evidence.

Challenge validity

Check for:

  • row or group leakage across splits;
  • labels, canonical identifiers, intent metadata, or teacher answers in prompts;
  • outcome-based case selection;
  • retries, repairs, remediation, or fallback hidden inside first-attempt metrics;
  • test-set use during prompt, corpus, or checkpoint selection;
  • evaluation of the final checkpoint while claiming the best checkpoint;
  • collapsed labels, goals, lanes, positions, or abstentions;
  • untested safety boundaries or unsupported generalization;
  • averages that hide per-lane failures;
  • loss presented as usefulness or acceptance.

Recompute inexpensive counts and hashes from preserved artifacts. Do not overwrite original reports when correcting them; create a clearly named addendum or new revision.

Deliver the verdict

List each gate as passed, failed, not run, or not applicable with an evidence path. State the narrowest defensible conclusion and the smallest concrete next fix. Preserve negative evidence and prevent incompatible runs from sharing a state file or revision label.

我的收藏