技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
expense-review【数据与研究】Review and analyze expenses with categorization, trend analysis, anomaly detection, policy compliance checks, and cost reduction recommendations. TRIGGER when: user says /expense-review, "review expenses", "expense analysis", "spending review", "cost analysis", "expense audit".
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Perform a structured review of organizational expenses to identify trends, anomalies, policy violations, and cost reduction opportunities. This skill produces an actionable expense analysis with clear findings and recommendations.
Define what is being reviewed and why.
| Parameter | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Review Scope | Department, cost center, project, or company-wide | Engineering department |
| Time Period | Period under review | Q4 2025 |
| Comparison Period | Benchmark for trend analysis | Q3 2025 and Q4 2024 |
| Data Source | ERP, expense management tool, GL export | NetSuite GL extract |
| Review Trigger | Routine, audit finding, budget overrun, ad hoc | Quarterly routine review |
| Materiality Threshold | Minimum amount for detailed line-item review | Transactions > $1,000 |
Ensure every transaction is properly classified before analysis.
| L1 Category | L2 Sub-Category | GL Code Range | Policy Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| People | Salaries & Wages | 6000–6099 | Per comp plan |
| People | Benefits | 6100–6199 | Per benefits plan |
| People | Contractors & Temps | 6200–6299 | SOW-based |
| Technology | Cloud & Hosting | 6300–6349 | Budget-based |
| Technology | Software Licenses | 6350–6399 | Per-seat approval |
| Technology | Hardware & Equipment | 6400–6449 | $2,500/item limit |
| Facilities | Rent & Utilities | 6500–6549 | Lease terms |
| Facilities | Office Supplies | 6550–6599 | $500/month/dept |
| Travel | Air & Ground Transport | 6600–6649 | Policy class limits |
| Travel | Lodging | 6650–6699 | $250/night cap |
| Travel | Meals & Entertainment | 6700–6749 | $75/person/meal |
| Marketing | Advertising & Media | 6800–6849 | Campaign budget |
| Marketing | Events & Sponsorships | 6850–6899 | Pre-approved only |
| Professional Svcs | Legal | 6900–6929 | Engagement letter |
| Professional Svcs | Accounting & Audit | 6930–6959 | Contract terms |
| Professional Svcs | Consulting | 6960–6999 | SOW required > $10K |
Compare the review period against benchmarks to identify directional changes.
| Category | Prior Period | Current Period | $ Change | % Change | Annualized Run Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People | |||||
| Technology | |||||
| Facilities | |||||
| Travel | |||||
| Marketing | |||||
| Professional Svcs | |||||
| Other | |||||
| Total |
Flag transactions and patterns that deviate from norms.
| Rule | Logic | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Single transaction spike | Any single transaction > 3x category monthly average | High |
| Category budget overrun | Category spend > 110% of budget | High |
| Duplicate payments | Same vendor, same amount, within 7 days | High |
| Round-number transactions | Exact round amounts ($5,000, $10,000) — possible estimate | Medium |
| Weekend / holiday submissions | Expense submitted on non-business day | Low |
| Split transactions | Multiple transactions just below approval threshold | High |
| Vendor concentration | Single vendor > 30% of category spend | Medium |
| Rapid growth vendor | Vendor spend up > 50% period-over-period | Medium |
| Missing receipts | Transactions above receipt threshold lacking documentation | High |
| Late submissions | Expense submitted > 60 days after incurrence | Medium |
| # | Date | Vendor | Amount | Category | Anomaly Type | Severity | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 |
Validate expenses against the organization's expense policy.
| Policy Rule | Compliant? | Exceptions Found | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| All expenses have valid receipts | |||
| Travel booked through approved channel | |||
| Meals within per-diem limits | |||
| Hotel rates within policy cap | |||
| Manager approval obtained before spend | |||
| Vendor on approved vendor list | |||
| Contracts signed for engagements > $10K | |||
| No personal expenses reimbursed | |||
| Expense reports submitted within 30 days | |||
| Proper GL coding applied |
Identify actionable savings based on the review findings.
| # | Opportunity | Category | Est. Annual Savings | Effort | Timeline | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renegotiate cloud hosting contract | Technology | $45,000 | Medium | 60 days | |
| 2 | Consolidate software licenses | Technology | $22,000 | Low | 30 days | |
| 3 | Enforce travel policy compliance | Travel | $18,000 | Low | Immediate | |
| 4 | Eliminate unused SaaS subscriptions | Technology | $15,000 | Low | 30 days | |
| 5 | Shift consulting to internal capacity | Prof. Svcs | $60,000 | High | 90 days |
## Expense Review — [Scope] — [Period]
### 1. Executive Summary
- Total spend: $X (change vs. prior period)
- Key findings (3-5 bullets)
- Total identified savings opportunity: $X
### 2. Spend Overview
[Category breakdown table with trends]
### 3. Trend Analysis
[Period-over-period comparison; key ratios]
### 4. Anomalies & Exceptions
[Anomaly log with severity and resolution status]
### 5. Policy Compliance
[Compliance checklist with exception details]
### 6. Cost Reduction Recommendations
[Prioritized opportunity list with savings estimates]
### 7. Action Items
[Owner, deadline, expected outcome for each recommendation]
| Scenario | Handling Approach |
|---|---|
| Incomplete data (missing months) | Flag data gaps; analyze available periods; note confidence limitation |
| Chart of accounts changed mid-period | Map old codes to new taxonomy; document mapping logic |
| Acquisition added new cost centers | Separate acquired entity expenses; analyze organic vs. inorganic trends |
| Currency volatility skewing comparisons | Show constant-currency comparison alongside reported figures |
| Shared services / cost allocations | Review allocation methodology; ensure drivers are current and fair |
| COVID or force-majeure period in baseline | Exclude distorted periods or use 2019 as normalized baseline |