界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

biz-unit-economics

biz-unit-economics

【开发与工程】Analyze unit economics to evaluate per-unit profitability and business model scalability. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether each transaction, customer, or product unit is profitable, evaluate startup viability, or optimize contribution margins — even if they say 'does our business model work', 'what's our margin per order', or 'can…

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: "biz-unit-economics" description: "Analyze unit economics to evaluate per-unit profitability and business model scalability. Use this skill when the user needs to assess whether each transaction, customer, or product unit is profitable, evaluate startup viability, or optimize contribution margins — even if they say 'does our business model work', 'what's our margin per order', or 'can we scale profitably'." metadata: category: "WP-15 商學院—財務" tags: ["finance", "unit-economics", "business-model"]

Unit Economics

Overview

Unit economics measures profitability at the single-unit level — per customer, per transaction, or per product. If unit economics are negative, scaling makes losses worse, not better. Positive unit economics are the prerequisite for sustainable growth.

Framework

IRON LAW: If Unit Economics Are Negative, Growth = Faster Death

Scaling a business with negative unit economics means losing more money
faster. "We'll make it up in volume" only works if variable costs per unit
decrease with scale (economies of scale). If they don't, more volume = more losses.

Prove unit economics are positive BEFORE investing in growth.

Key Metrics by Business Model

Subscription/SaaS:

MetricFormula
CACTotal acquisition spend / New customers
LTVARPU × Gross Margin × (1/Churn Rate)
LTV:CACMust be > 3:1
Payback PeriodCAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin)
Net Revenue Retention(Starting MRR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) / Starting MRR

E-commerce/Marketplace:

MetricFormula
AOVTotal Revenue / Number of Orders
Contribution Margin per OrderAOV - COGS - Shipping - Payment fees - Returns
Repeat RateReturning customers / Total customers
Fully-loaded CACTotal marketing / New customers

On-demand/Delivery:

MetricFormula
Revenue per TripOrder value × Take rate
Cost per TripDriver pay + Support + Insurance + Incentives
Contribution per TripRevenue - Cost per Trip
Orders per Day per DriverUtilization metric

Analysis Steps

  1. Define the unit: What is one "unit"? (customer, order, trip, seat)
  2. Calculate revenue per unit: What does each unit generate?
  3. Calculate variable cost per unit: What does each unit cost?
  4. Calculate contribution margin: Revenue - Variable cost
  5. Layer fixed costs: At what volume do you cover fixed costs? (→ break-even)
  6. Assess scalability: Do unit economics improve or degrade at 10x volume?

Output Format

# Unit Economics: {Business}

## Unit Definition
- Unit: {customer / order / trip}
- Time period: {monthly / per-transaction}

## Per-Unit Economics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Revenue per unit | ${X} |
| Variable cost per unit | ${X} |
| Contribution margin | ${X} ({X%}) |

## Scalability Assessment
| Volume | Unit Revenue | Unit Cost | CM | Notes |
|--------|-------------|-----------|-----|-------|
| Current ({N}) | ${X} | ${X} | {X%} | baseline |
| 3x ({N}) | ${X} | ${X} | {X%} | {economies of scale?} |
| 10x ({N}) | ${X} | ${X} | {X%} | {what changes?} |

## Verdict
{Positive/negative unit economics, scalability assessment, key lever to improve}

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: Unit economics for a Taiwan food delivery startup

  • Revenue per order: NT$350 × 30% take rate = NT$105
  • Variable costs: Driver pay NT$65 + Payment fee NT$10 + Support NT$5 = NT$80
  • Contribution margin: NT$25/order (23.8%) ✓
  • At 10x scale: Driver pay drops to NT$55 (better routing), CM improves to NT$35 (33%)
  • Verdict: Marginally positive, scale-dependent — needs volume for viability

Incorrect Application

  • "Revenue per customer is NT$500, cost per customer is NT$200, so we make NT$300 per customer" — but excluded customer support (NT$150) and payment processing (NT$50). True margin is NT$100. Must include ALL variable costs per unit.

Gotchas

  • "We'll achieve economies of scale": Maybe. Identify WHICH costs decrease with scale and by how much. Delivery driver pay may not decrease. Server costs for SaaS typically do.
  • Contribution margin ≠ profit: CM covers variable costs only. You still need enough total CM to cover fixed costs (see Break-Even Analysis).
  • Blended vs cohort: Blended unit economics across all customers hides that early customers (organic) may be profitable while recent customers (paid acquisition) are not.
  • Negative unit economics can be strategic: Temporarily, in land-grab markets with network effects (ride-sharing, marketplaces). But the path to positive must be explicit.

Scripts

ScriptDescriptionUsage
scripts/unit_economics.pyCompute SaaS unit economics (NRR, GRR, LTV, CAC payback, magic number, burn multiple)python scripts/unit_economics.py --help

Run python scripts/unit_economics.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.

References

  • For CAC-LTV deep dive, see the biz-cac-ltv skill
  • For break-even analysis, see the biz-breakeven skill
我的收藏