The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Design & creative · SKILL.md

offensive-security-analyst

offensive-security-analyst

Guides authorized offensive security work—engagement scoping and rules of engagement, reconnaissance, vulnerability validation, exploitation proof-of-concept, attack-path chaining, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and remediation-focused reporting for pentests and red-team exercises. Use when planning or executing authorized penetration tests, validating findings with…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: offensive-security-analyst description: | Guides authorized offensive security work—engagement scoping and rules of engagement, reconnaissance, vulnerability validation, exploitation proof-of-concept, attack-path chaining, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, and remediation-focused reporting for pentests and red-team exercises. Use when planning or executing authorized penetration tests, validating findings with reproducible PoCs, prioritizing exploitable issues, simulating adversary TTPs within scope, or writing offensive findings for engineering remediation—not for SOC alert triage (defensive-security-analyst), security program or GRC design (cybersecurity), CI/CD hardening (devsecops), or LLM jailbreak and prompt-injection testing (ai-redteam).

Offensive Security Analyst

When to Use

  • Plan or execute authorized penetration tests, red-team exercises, or exploit validation
  • Confirm rules of engagement, in-scope assets, test windows, and emergency stop conditions
  • Perform reconnaissance, vulnerability validation, PoC development, and attack-path chaining within scope
  • Prioritize exploitable findings by impact and likelihood
  • Write remediation-focused offensive security reports and retest plans

When NOT to Use

  • Investigate SOC alerts, logs, or suspicious activity → defensive-security-analyst
  • Define security strategy, policy, or GRC program direction → cybersecurity
  • Add CI/CD or supply-chain security controls → devsecops
  • Implement enterprise security tooling and guardrails → information-security-engineer
  • Test LLM prompts, agent tools, or AI jailbreak resistance → ai-redteam

Related skills

NeedSkill
CVD intake, embargo, advisory publicationtechnical-program-manager-security-cvd
Blue-team triage and detectionsdefensive-security-analyst
Security program, policies, IR programcybersecurity
Pipeline and supply-chain testing in CIdevsecops
LLM/agent adversarial testingai-redteam
Findings documentation for customerstech-writer-researcher

Core Workflows

1. Engagement scope and authorization

Do not test without written authorization.

  1. Confirm signed SOW/ROE: in-scope assets, methods, windows, contacts
  2. Define out-of-scope (prod data destruction, social engineering, DoS unless approved)
  3. Set severity rubric aligned with customer
  4. Establish emergency stop and escalation path
  5. Use isolated lab or designated test tenants when possible

See references/engagement_scope.md for ROE checklist and severity rubric.

2. Reconnaissance and enumeration

passive OSINT → asset inventory → service/version ID → auth surface mapping → prioritize targets

Document everything: source, timestamp, tool, raw output hash or path.

See references/recon_enumeration.md for recon phases and asset tracking.

3. Vulnerability assessment and validation

  1. Run scans appropriate to scope (authenticated where allowed)
  2. Validate each finding manually—no report-only scanner noise
  3. Classify: exploitable, conditional, informational
  4. Map to CWE/CVE and ATT&CK where applicable
  5. Note compensating controls that block exploitation

See references/vulnerability_assessment.md for validation criteria and false positive filters.

4. Exploitation and attack paths

PoC requirements:

  • Minimal steps to demonstrate impact
  • Evidence: request/response, screenshot, command output
  • Clear preconditions (role, network position, config)
  • Stop at agreed impact (e.g., proof of RCE without lateral movement unless scoped)

Chain findings into attack paths: initial access → privilege → objective.

See references/exploitation_chain.md for PoC template and chaining worksheet.

5. Post-exploitation (when in scope)

Only within ROE:

  • Credential access proof (hashed, not exfiltrating real secrets unnecessarily)
  • Lateral movement to agreed segment
  • Data access proof without excessive collection

Document cleanup: accounts created, shells, persistence removed before closeout.

6. Reporting and remediation

Per finding:

FieldContent
TitleBusiness-readable
SeverityPer agreed rubric
DescriptionWhat and where
ImpactConfidentiality, integrity, availability
ReproductionNumbered steps
EvidenceRedacted artifacts
RemediationSpecific fix + validation retest

Deliver executive summary + technical appendix; schedule retest for critical/high.

See references/reporting_remediation.md for report structure and retest checklist.

When to load references

  • Scope, ROE, authorization → references/engagement_scope.md
  • Recon and enumeration → references/recon_enumeration.md
  • Scanning and validation → references/vulnerability_assessment.md
  • PoCs and attack paths → references/exploitation_chain.md
  • Reports and retest → references/reporting_remediation.md
Saved skills