The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Data & research · SKILL.md

cti-analyst

cti-analyst

Guides cyber threat intelligence (CTI)—collection and vetting of intel from OSINT, commercial feeds, and ISACs; threat actor and campaign analysis; IOC/TTP production with MITRE ATT&CK mapping; STIX/TAXII and sharing concepts; strategic, tactical, and operational intel briefs; fusion with hunts and incident response; confidence scoring and source handling. …

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: cti-analyst description: | Guides cyber threat intelligence (CTI)—collection and vetting of intel from OSINT, commercial feeds, and ISACs; threat actor and campaign analysis; IOC/TTP production with MITRE ATT&CK mapping; STIX/TAXII and sharing concepts; strategic, tactical, and operational intel briefs; fusion with hunts and incident response; confidence scoring and source handling. Use for CTI, threat intelligence, threat actor profiling, IOC production, TTP analysis, intel briefs, STIX, ISAC reporting, campaign analysis, APT reporting—not proactive hunt execution (threat-hunter), SOC alert triage (soc-analyst), adversary simulation ops (red-team-specialist), incident command (incident-responder), or legal conclusions.

CTI Analyst (Cyber Threat Intelligence)

When to Use

  • Collect and vet intelligence from OSINT, commercial feeds, government advisories, and ISACs
  • Profile threat actors and analyze campaigns (objectives, targeting, infrastructure, timing)
  • Produce IOCs and TTPs with MITRE ATT&CK mapping and consumer-ready context
  • Draft intel briefs (strategic, tactical, operational) for leadership, SOC, hunts, and IR
  • Package sharing artifacts (STIX concepts, TAXII awareness, distribution tiers, handling rules)
  • Fuse intel into hunt hypotheses, detection priorities, and active incident context
  • Score confidence and document sources, limitations, and collection bias

When NOT to Use

  • Execute hypothesis-driven hunts across enterprise telemetry → threat-hunter
  • Triage SIEM/EDR alerts, run SOAR playbooks, or close SOC queues → soc-analyst
  • Declare incidents, lead containment, or draft regulatory/legal conclusions → incident-responder
  • Plan or operate authorized adversary simulation campaigns → red-team-specialist
  • Define enterprise security strategy, ISMS, or GRC roadmaps → cybersecurity
  • Implement SIEM rules, feeds, or IAM from intel (primary) → information-security-engineer
  • Score enterprise risk registers or board heat maps (primary) → security-risk-analyst
  • Execute authorized pentests or exploitation → penetration-tester

Related skills

NeedSkill
Proactive hunt campaigns, query packs, detection feedbackthreat-hunter
Alert triage, enrichment playbooks, SOC escalationsoc-analyst
Declared incident command, timelines, stakeholder IRincident-responder
Adversary simulation, purple team, detection validation opsred-team-specialist
Security program, intel function governancecybersecurity
Feed ingestion, STIX parsers, SIEM/EDR integrationsinformation-security-engineer
Risk scenarios, treatment from intel-driven threatssecurity-risk-analyst
Pentest findings as supplemental technical contextpenetration-tester

Consumer handoff chain

  1. cti-analyst — vets sources, produces briefs, IOC/TTP packages, and confidence-rated assessments.
  2. threat-hunter — converts tactical intel into falsifiable hunt hypotheses and query packs.
  3. soc-analyst — applies IOCs and context to alert enrichment and triage (not intel production).
  4. incident-responder — consumes operational intel during active incidents; CTI supports timelines and attribution hypotheses, not IR command.

CTI does not replace hunts, SOC queues, or CSIRT command. Escalate active compromise immediately to incident-responder with whatever intel exists—do not delay IR for “perfect” attribution.

Core Workflows

1. Requirements and collection plan

  1. Capture consumer ask (leadership, SOC, hunt, IR, risk, engineering)
  2. Define intelligence requirements (IRs): priority questions, time horizon, sectors, regions
  3. Inventory sources (OSINT, commercial, ISAC, internal telemetry summaries); note gaps and bias
  4. Set handling, classification, and sharing constraints (TLP, need-to-know, export controls)

See references/cti_analyst_scope.md and references/collection_and_source_vetting.md.

2. Source vetting and fusion

  1. Evaluate source reliability and information credibility (separate dimensions)
  2. Correlate multiple reporting lines; flag single-source or circular citations
  3. Deduplicate IOCs; normalize formats; record first-seen and context
  4. Document what is unknown and what would change the assessment

See references/collection_and_source_vetting.md.

3. Actor and campaign analysis

  1. Cluster infrastructure, malware families, and targeting patterns
  2. Map to known groups or uncategorized clusters with explicit uncertainty
  3. Describe campaign timeline, objectives, and likely next actions (as hypotheses)
  4. Avoid over-claiming attribution; separate facts from analytic judgment

See references/threat_actor_and_campaign_analysis.md.

4. IOC, TTP, and ATT&CK mapping

  1. Publish IOCs with type, context, expiration, and false-positive notes
  2. Document TTPs at technique and procedure level where evidence supports it
  3. Map to MITRE ATT&CK; note detection opportunities and data-source dependencies
  4. Prioritize consumers: block lists vs hunt pivots vs strategic awareness

See references/ioc_ttp_and_attck_mapping.md.

5. Sharing, STIX, and confidence

  1. Choose distribution tier and audience-appropriate detail
  2. Apply STIX 2.x object concepts (indicator, malware, threat-actor, relationship) when sharing technically
  3. Understand TAXII collections as transport—not a substitute for vetting
  4. Attach confidence and source metadata to every analytic line

See references/sharing_stix_and_confidence.md.

6. Briefs and handoff

  1. Match format to audience: strategic (risk/themes), tactical (campaign/IOCs), operational (IR/hunt actions)
  2. Lead with bottom line; separate observations from judgments
  3. Package handoff artifacts for threat-hunter, soc-analyst, or incident-responder as appropriate
  4. Schedule review cadence; retract or update stale intel explicitly

See references/intel_briefs_and_consumer_handoff.md.

When to load references

  • Role boundaries and IRs → references/cti_analyst_scope.md
  • Collection and vetting → references/collection_and_source_vetting.md
  • Actors and campaigns → references/threat_actor_and_campaign_analysis.md
  • IOCs, TTPs, ATT&CK → references/ioc_ttp_and_attck_mapping.md
  • STIX, sharing, confidence → references/sharing_stix_and_confidence.md
  • Briefs and handoff → references/intel_briefs_and_consumer_handoff.md

Outputs

  • Collection plan — IRs, sources, gaps, handling constraints
  • Source vetting notes — reliability, credibility, circular-reference flags
  • Actor/campaign profile — timeline, targeting, infrastructure, hypotheses, gaps
  • IOC/TTP package — normalized indicators, ATT&CK mapping, consumer guidance
  • Intel brief — strategic, tactical, or operational (audience-specific)
  • Sharing bundle — STIX-oriented export where applicable; distribution record
  • Handoff memo — prioritized actions for hunt, SOC, or IR consumers
Saved skills