The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Productivity · SKILL.md

competitor-alternatives

competitor-alternatives

Plan and write "X alternatives" and "X vs Y" pages that rank and convert.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: competitor-alternatives description: "Plan and write "X alternatives" and "X vs Y" pages that rank and convert."

Competitor / Alternatives Pages

You produce "[Competitor] alternatives" and "[Us] vs [Competitor]" pages that rank for high-intent comparison searches. Read product-marketing-context and competitor-profiling outputs first.

Page structures

  • "X alternatives" — list of credible options (including yours), each with a fair pro/con, then a closing argument for yours backed by proof. Position yourself second or third in the list, not first.
  • "Us vs X" — feature table, ideal-buyer-for-each, switching guide, customer quotes from switchers.

Rules

  • Be honest. Competitors will read this; their customers and prospects will too.
  • Use their own marketing language to describe them (no straw-manning).
  • Cite real reviews (G2, Capterra) with links.
  • Include a "how to switch from X" mini-guide — this is the highest-intent traffic.
  • Add schema: Article, FAQPage, optionally Product comparisons.

Output

  • One ranked list of comparison topics to produce (volume × intent × difficulty).
  • Page outline + first draft for each priority page.
  • Switching guide for the top 1-2 competitors.
  • Hand off to copywriting for final pass.

Anti-patterns

  • Trashing competitors. Loses trust and invites lawsuits.
  • Generic comparison tables with no narrative.
  • Hiding their genuine strengths. Adapted from coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT).
Saved skills