writing-skills
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
review-data-analysisReview a data analysis for quality, correctness, and reproducibility. Covers data quality assessment, assumption checking, model validation, data leakage detection, and reproducibility verification. Use when reviewing a colleague's analysis before publication, validating an ML pipeline before production deployment, auditing a report for regulatory or busine…
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
評數析管之正、韌、可復。
評析前審入數:
## Data Quality Assessment
### Completeness
- [ ] Missing data quantified (% by column and by row)
- [ ] Missing data mechanism considered (MCAR, MAR, MNAR)
- [ ] Imputation method appropriate (if used) or complete-case analysis justified
### Consistency
- [ ] Data types match expectations (dates are dates, numbers are numbers)
- [ ] Value ranges are plausible (no negative ages, future dates in historical data)
- [ ] Categorical variables have expected levels (no misspellings, consistent coding)
- [ ] Units are consistent across records
### Uniqueness
- [ ] Duplicate records identified and handled
- [ ] Primary keys are unique where expected
- [ ] Join operations produce expected row counts (no fan-out or drop)
### Timeliness
- [ ] Data vintage appropriate for the analysis question
- [ ] Temporal coverage matches the study period
- [ ] No look-ahead bias in time-series data
### Provenance
- [ ] Data source documented
- [ ] Extraction date/version recorded
- [ ] Any transformations between source and analysis input documented
得:數質患書、含其對果或影。 敗:數不可審→自碼估質(何察與化施)。
各統法或所用模:
| Method | Key Assumptions | How to Check |
|---|---|---|
| Linear regression | Linearity, independence, normality of residuals, homoscedasticity | Residual plots, Q-Q plot, Durbin-Watson, Breusch-Pagan |
| Logistic regression | Independence, no multicollinearity, linear logit | VIF, Box-Tidwell, residual diagnostics |
| t-test | Independence, normality (or large n), equal variance | Shapiro-Wilk, Levene's test, visual inspection |
| ANOVA | Independence, normality, homogeneity of variance | Shapiro-Wilk per group, Levene's test |
| Chi-squared | Independence, expected frequency ≥ 5 | Expected frequency table |
| Random forest | Sufficient training data, feature relevance | OOB error, feature importance, learning curves |
| Neural network | Sufficient data, appropriate architecture, no data leakage | Validation curves, overfitting checks |
## Assumption Check Results
| Analysis Step | Method | Assumption | Checked? | Result |
|---------------|--------|------------|----------|--------|
| Primary model | Linear regression | Normality of residuals | Yes | Q-Q plot shows mild deviation — acceptable for n>100 |
| Primary model | Linear regression | Homoscedasticity | No | Not checked — recommend adding Breusch-Pagan test |
得:各統法之設明察或認。 敗:設違→察作者處之乎(韌法、化、敏析)。
數漏即訓集外訊影模、致過樂效:
## Leakage Assessment
| Check | Status | Evidence |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Target leakage | Clear | No features derived from target |
| Temporal leakage | CONCERN | Feature X uses 30-day forward average |
| Train-test contamination | Clear | StandardScaler fit on train only |
| Group leakage | CONCERN | Patient IDs not used for stratified split |
得:諸常漏模察含潔/憂態。 敗:漏發見→重行無漏徵估其影(若可)或標令析者察。
得:模驗應用例(測對推)。 敗:測集效疑近訓效→標潛漏。
## Reproducibility Checklist
| Item | Status | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Code runs without errors | [Yes/No] | Tested on [environment description] |
| Random seeds set | [Yes/No] | Line [N] in [file] |
| Dependencies documented | [Yes/No] | requirements.txt / renv.lock present |
| Data loading reproducible | [Yes/No] | Path is [relative/absolute/URL] |
| Results match reported values | [Yes/No] | Verified: Table 1 ✓, Figure 2 ✗ (minor discrepancy) |
| Environment documented | [Yes/No] | Python 3.11 / R 4.5.0 specified |
得:可復重行析驗(或數無時自碼估)。 敗:果不確復→定異於浮容內乎抑示問。
## Data Analysis Review
### Overall Assessment
[1-2 sentences: Is the analysis sound? Does it support the conclusions?]
### Data Quality
[Summary of data quality findings, impact on results]
### Methodological Concerns
1. **[Title]**: [Description, location in code/report, suggestion]
2. ...
### Strengths
1. [What was done well]
2. ...
### Reproducibility
[Tier assessment: Gold/Silver/Bronze/Opaque with justification]
### Recommendations
- [ ] [Specific action items for the analyst]
得:審供可動饋含特碼處引。 敗:時限→質與漏察優於格患。
review-research — 廣研法與稿審validate-statistical-output — 雙程驗法generate-statistical-tables — 發備統表review-software-architecture — 碼構與設審