The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Productivity · SKILL.md

support-macro

support-macro

Write reusable support macros / canned responses that sound human, not robotic. Use when asked to write a support macro, a canned response, a saved reply, or a template for a common customer ticket. Produces a macro — an empathetic opener, the clear answer/steps, placeholders for personalisation, and a warm close — plus variants (resolved / need-more-info /…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: support-macro description: "Write reusable support macros / canned responses that sound human, not robotic. Use when asked to write a support macro, a canned response, a saved reply, or a template for a common customer ticket. Produces a macro — an empathetic opener, the clear answer/steps, placeholders for personalisation, and a warm close — plus variants (resolved / need-more-info / escalating), tuned to keep it human."

Support Macro Skill

Macros make support fast — but bad ones make it feel like a wall of copy-paste, which customers hate. A good macro is a scaffold: empathetic opener, the actual answer in clear steps, obvious personalisation slots, and a human close — fast for the agent, warm for the customer. This skill writes that, with the variants a single situation usually needs.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • The scenario — the common ticket this macro answers (password reset, refund request, bug report, how-to).
  • The resolution — the actual answer or steps.
  • Brand voice — formal, friendly, playful (defaults to warm-professional).
  • Constraints — anything that must be said (policy, legal, security) or links to include.

Output Format

Macro: [scenario]

Primary macro:

Opener — acknowledge the person + their issue specifically ("Sorry the export failed — let's get that sorted."). Not "Dear valued customer." Answer — the resolution in clear, numbered steps where it's a process. One idea per line. Personalisation slots — clearly marked [first name], [order #], [specific detail] the agent fills. Close — a warm, human sign-off + an open door ("If that doesn't do it, just reply here and I'll dig in.").

Variants (same scenario, different outcomes):

  • Resolved — the answer above, confident it's fixed.
  • Need more info — what you need from them and why, framed helpfully (not interrogation).
  • Escalating / known issue — honest acknowledgement, what happens next, and a realistic timeframe.

Notes: keep placeholders obvious so agents always personalise; flag the one line that must stay (policy/legal); keep it scannable on mobile.

Quality Checks

  • Opens by acknowledging the person and their specific issue
  • The answer is clear and step-by-step where it's a process
  • Personalisation slots are clearly marked so agents fill them every time
  • Includes the variants the scenario needs (resolved / more-info / escalating)
  • Sounds like a person — contractions, warmth — not a corporate template

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not write "Dear valued customer" / robotic openers — acknowledge the actual person and problem
  • Do not make it un-personalisable — a macro with no slots gets sent cold and feels like spam
  • Do not bury the answer in apology — empathise briefly, then solve
  • Do not over-promise on escalations — give an honest, realistic timeframe
  • Do not write one macro for a scenario with multiple outcomes — give the resolved/more-info/escalating variants

Based On

Support-experience practice — empathetic, scannable, personalised canned responses (Zendesk/Intercom macro conventions).

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write a support macro."
  • "Write a canned response for refund requests."
  • "Write a saved reply that doesn't sound robotic."
  • "Template our answer to this common ticket."
Saved skills