executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
s4h-narrative-structure-mappingApplies story architecture to any communication — proposal, presentation, strategy doc — so it moves people rather than informing them. Use when asked to 'structure this as a story', 'make this compelling', 'narrative arc', 'how do I present this', or 'story structure'.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Facts don't change behavior; narrative does. The same information delivered as a story is more persuasive, more memorable, and more likely to produce action than the same information delivered as a report. Three-act structure works because it mirrors how humans process change: there is a world, the world is disrupted, a new world becomes possible. Any communication that needs to move people — not just inform them — benefits from this architecture.
Step 1: Identify Audience and Current Belief Who is the specific audience? What do they already believe about this situation? You are not starting from zero — you are moving them from where they are.
Framing check: Confirm the specific communication and its audience before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual content being structured and who it is for — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Step 2: Find the Tension What is the gap between current state and desired state? If there is no tension, there is no story. The tension must be real to the audience, not just to the sender.
Step 3: Map Three-Act Structure
Step 4: Locate the Transformation What must the audience feel or understand at the turning point that makes the resolution feel earned rather than asserted? This is the moment of insight — the structural heart of the communication.
Step 5: Place Evidence Inside the Story Data supports narrative; it does not replace it. Assign each data point or proof element to its place in the arc — evidence that arrives before the audience is ready to receive it doesn't land.
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
Audience: [who + current belief]
Tension: [current state → desired state → gap]
Narrative Outline
| Section | Content | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Hook | Opens with tension, not context | |
| Setup | World as audience knows it | |
| Disruption | What has changed or is at risk | |
| Confrontation | Stakes and complexity | |
| Turning Point | The insight that makes resolution possible | |
| Resolution | The new world; what becomes possible | |
| Call to Action | Specific ask |
Where Data Fits: [data point → narrative position]
The most common failure is leading with resolution — announcing the answer before the audience has felt the tension. Make them need the answer before you give it.
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-writing-restructure — Restructure based on what the structure mapping found/s4h-narrative-tension-mapping — Map tension points within the structure/s4h-writing-arc-design — Design the arc from the structure map