The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Design & creative · SKILL.md

holdback-experiment-design

holdback-experiment-design

Design degradation holdbacks and long-term cumulative holdbacks for product experiments and feature rollouts. Use when a team needs a long-term counterfactual, wants to measure delayed impact after launch, is worried about metric degradation over time, needs to decide holdback size or duration, or must weigh the user/business cost of withholding a feature.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: holdback-experiment-design description: Design degradation holdbacks and long-term cumulative holdbacks for product experiments and feature rollouts. Use when a team needs a long-term counterfactual, wants to measure delayed impact after launch, is worried about metric degradation over time, needs to decide holdback size or duration, or must weigh the user/business cost of withholding a feature. license: MIT compatibility: Codex, Claude Code, and other Agent Skills-compatible clients. metadata: version: "0.1.0" displayName: Holdback Experiment Design category: Product Management tags: practical-ab-testing,ab-testing,experimentation,holdbacks,product-analytics

Holdback Experiment Design

Use this skill to plan holdbacks that preserve a comparison group after a feature rollout. Holdbacks are useful when effects may appear later, accumulate, or degrade after launch.

Source Traceability

Primary source: Practical A/B Testing by Leemay Nassery. Guidance is transformed and paraphrased from chapter 3 lines 2487-2836. Experiment-type context comes from chapter 3 lines 2013-2486.

Related Advanced Skills

  • long-term-impact-evaluation: use before detailed holdback design when the team should compare holdbacks against post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, CLV models, or hybrid methods.
  • trustworthy-experiment-insights: use when deciding whether long-term or holdback evidence is credible enough to drive a product decision.

Reference Routing

NeedRead
Holdback conceptsreferences/core/knowledge.md
Design and cost rulesreferences/core/rules.md
Scenario examplesreferences/core/examples.md
Step-by-step planningworkflows/design-holdback.md

Workflow

  1. State why short-term A/B evidence is insufficient.
  2. Choose degradation or long-term cumulative holdback.
  3. Define who remains withheld, for how long, and from what experience.
  4. Select long-term metrics and guardrails.
  5. Estimate the user, business, and ethical cost of withholding.
  6. Define monitoring cadence, exit criteria, and communication plan.

Output Format

# Holdback Plan

## Purpose
[What long-term question this holdback answers.]

## Holdback Type
[Degradation | Long-term cumulative]

## Population And Duration
- Holdback population:
- Rollout population:
- Duration:
- Removal criteria:

## Metrics
| Metric | Role | Readout Cadence | Concern |
|--------|------|-----------------|---------|

## Cost Of Withholding
- User cost:
- Business cost:
- Ethical or trust concern:

## Decision Rules
- Continue holdback if:
- End holdback if:
- Escalate if:

Quality Bar

  • Do not create a holdback without a specific long-term question.
  • Do not withhold a clearly valuable feature longer than the question requires.
  • Do not ignore the opportunity cost to held-back users.
  • Monitor guardrails while the holdback is active.
Saved skills