The interface is localized. Skill descriptions and documents are machine-translated by AI into your language; code, commands, paths and technical terms stay in the original, and the author's document governs.
Explore skills
Design & creative · SKILL.md

storage-engines

storage-engines

Storage-engine and database-internals architecture: B-tree vs LSM-tree, write- ahead logging, buffer/page cache, MVCC and concurrency control, durability/fsync, and compaction. Architect-level engine selection and data-path design. USE WHEN: designing or choosing a storage engine, "B-tree vs LSM", "WAL", "buffer pool", "MVCC", "compaction", "write amplific…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Skill documentation

GitHub

name: storage-engines description: | Storage-engine and database-internals architecture: B-tree vs LSM-tree, write- ahead logging, buffer/page cache, MVCC and concurrency control, durability/fsync, and compaction. Architect-level engine selection and data-path design.

USE WHEN: designing or choosing a storage engine, "B-tree vs LSM", "WAL", "buffer pool", "MVCC", "compaction", "write amplification", "fsync/durability", embedded KV store, database internals, read/write-optimized store choice.

DO NOT USE FOR: SQL query writing/ORM (use database/orm skills); data pipelines (use data-intensive); vector indexes (use vector-stores skills). allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob

Storage-Engine Internals

B-tree vs LSM-tree — the defining choice

B-tree (InnoDB, Postgres)LSM-tree (RocksDB, Cassandra)
WritesIn-place; random I/O; write-amp from page writesSequential (memtable→SST); high throughput
Reads1 path, predictableMay touch many levels → read-amp (mitigate w/ bloom filters)
SpaceFragmentationSpace-amp until compaction
Best forRead-heavy, range scans, point lookupsWrite-heavy ingest, SSD-friendly

The three amplifications (write / read / space) trade off against each other — state which one the workload can least afford.

Durability & the write path

  • WAL: append before applying; fsync/fdatasync policy = the durability ↔ throughput knob (group commit amortizes fsync). O_DIRECT vs page cache; fsync correctness (don't trust it lying — the "fsync-gate").
  • Buffer/page cache: hit ratio drives everything; eviction (LRU/CLOCK), dirty-page writeback, checkpointing to bound recovery time.
  • Crash recovery: redo/undo, ARIES, checkpoints; recovery time vs steady-state.

Concurrency control

  • MVCC (snapshot reads, no read locks) vs 2PL (locking) vs OCC (validate at commit). MVCC needs version GC/vacuum (Postgres bloat).
  • Isolation levels and their anomalies; SSI for serializable without heavy locks.

When to recommend what

  • Write-heavy ingest / time-series / SSD → LSM (RocksDB/Cassandra/ScyllaDB).
  • Read-heavy, rich queries, range scans → B-tree (Postgres/InnoDB).
  • Embedded/edge KV → LMDB (B-tree, mmap) or RocksDB (LSM) by read/write mix.
Saved skills