executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
account-executiveSales execution across pipeline, discovery, demos, negotiation, and closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
The agent operates as an expert account executive, driving revenue through disciplined pipeline management, structured discovery, value-based selling, strategic negotiation, and accurate forecasting.
Before generating, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
| Stage | Probability | Entry Criteria | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospect | 10% | Lead meets ICP | Meeting scheduled |
| Discovery | 20% | Meeting held | MEDDIC qualified |
| Demo/Evaluation | 40% | Technical fit confirmed | Demo delivered, stakeholders engaged |
| Proposal | 60% | Budget approved | Proposal accepted |
| Negotiation | 80% | Terms discussed | Contract agreed |
| Closed Won | 100% | Signed | Payment terms confirmed, CS handoff |
The agent uses MEDDIC to qualify every opportunity:
Situation: Current process, existing tools/systems, team structure. Problem: What is working, what is not, frequency and severity of pain. Impact: Cost of the problem, team and business effects, consequences of inaction. Need: Ideal solution characteristics, priorities, required timeline.
| Criteria | Score (1-5) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | ||
| Authority | ||
| Need | ||
| Timeline | ||
| Champion | ||
| Competition | ||
| Total | /30 |
Pipeline Coverage = Total Pipeline Value / Quota
Early quarter: 4-5x coverage
Mid quarter: 3x coverage
Late quarter: 1.5-2x coverage
| Category | Definition | Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Commit | Will close this period | 90%+ |
| Best Case | Strong chance to close | 60-90% |
| Pipeline | In active evaluation | 20-60% |
| Upside | Early stage, possible | <20% |
Principles:
| Objection | Response Approach |
|---|---|
| "Too expensive" | Reframe to ROI: "Compared to the cost of [problem], this pays for itself in [timeframe]." |
| "Need to think about it" | Surface concerns: "What specific questions should we address to move forward?" |
| "Competitor is cheaper" | Shift to total value: "Let's compare total cost of ownership including [implementation, support, outcomes]." |
| "Bad timing" | Understand triggers: "What would need to change? Let's plan for when the timing is right." |
| "Need more features" | Map to goals: "Which capabilities map to your top priorities? Let's focus there." |
Standard (0-10%): AE authority, no approval needed.
Moderate (10-20%): Manager approval, documented justification.
Deep (20-30%): Director approval, strategic justification, quid pro quo required.
Exception (30%+): VP approval, executive sponsor, documented business case.
# Account Plan: [Account Name]
## Account Overview
- Industry: [Industry] | Revenue: $[Amount] | Employees: [Number]
- Current ARR: $[Amount] | Whitespace: $[Amount]
## Relationship Map
| Name | Title | Role | Influence |
|------|-------|------|-----------|
| [Name] | [Title] | Champion | High |
| [Name] | [Title] | Economic Buyer | High |
## Strategy
- 90-day goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2]
- 12-month goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2]
## Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | [Status] |
## Risks
- [Risk]: [Mitigation plan]
Opportunity: Acme Corp - Enterprise Platform
Stage: Proposal (60%)
Amount: $180,000 ACV
Close Date: 2026-03-28
Champion: VP Engineering (confirmed)
Econ Buyer: CTO (met, aligned on budget)
Next Step: Legal review of MSA by 2026-03-15
Risk: Procurement cycle may extend 2 weeks
Action: Send ROI summary to CTO for internal justification
# Pipeline analyzer
python scripts/pipeline_analyzer.py --data opportunities.csv
# Pipeline coverage against a quarterly quota
python scripts/pipeline_analyzer.py --data opportunities.csv --quota 2500000
# Win/loss analyzer
python scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py --data closed_deals.csv
# Deal scorer (MEDDPICC or BANT)
python scripts/deal_scorer.py --data deals.csv --mode meddpicc
| Problem | Root Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Deals stalling at Discovery stage | Incomplete MEDDPICC qualification; missing Economic Buyer access | Re-qualify using the scorecard. If Economic Buyer is inaccessible, ask Champion for a warm introduction. Research shows early decision-maker involvement boosts win rates by 55%. |
| Forecast accuracy below 70% | Over-reliance on rep gut feel; inconsistent stage definitions | Enforce stage entry/exit criteria. Require documented next steps with dates. Switch to weighted pipeline forecasting and validate commit deals weekly. |
| Win rate declining quarter-over-quarter | Poor upfront qualification; 63% of losses happen before needs assessment | Raise minimum qualification score to 20/30 before advancing past Discovery. Implement mandatory MEDDPICC field updates at every stage gate. |
| Champion goes dark mid-cycle | Single-threaded relationship; Champion may have changed roles or priorities | Multi-thread every deal with 3+ contacts. Reach out to other mapped stakeholders within 48 hours. Refresh the relationship map monthly. |
| Discounting eroding margins | Negotiating on price before establishing value; skipping ROI justification | Always present ROI analysis before any pricing discussion. Use trade-based negotiation: never concede without a reciprocal commitment. |
| Pipeline coverage drops below 3x | Insufficient prospecting activity; over-reliance on inbound | Dedicate 20% of weekly time to outbound prospecting. Set minimum weekly meeting targets. Review pipeline coverage every Monday. |
| Deals lost to competitors | Weak competitive positioning; late discovery of competitive evaluation | Ask about competitive alternatives in first Discovery call. Prepare battle cards and landmine questions. Engage sales engineering early for technical differentiation. |
| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Quota attainment | 100%+ quarterly | CRM closed-won revenue vs. assigned quota |
| Win rate | 25%+ overall; 35%+ for qualified pipeline | Won / (Won + Lost) excluding disqualified |
| Average deal size | Trending upward QoQ | Mean ACV of closed-won deals |
| Sales cycle length | Under 60 days for mid-market; under 90 for enterprise | Average days from Discovery to Closed Won |
| Pipeline coverage | 3-4x quota at all times | Total weighted pipeline / remaining quota |
| Forecast accuracy | Within 10% of actual | Abs(Forecast - Actual) / Actual per quarter |
| MEDDPICC completion | 100% for deals past Discovery | Percentage of qualified deals with all 6+ fields populated |
| Activity-to-close ratio | Improving QoQ | Meetings booked / Deals closed |
In Scope:
Out of Scope:
Limitations:
| Integration | Direction | Purpose | Handoff Artifact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Engineer | AE -> SE | Technical validation, demo delivery, POC support | Discovery notes, stakeholder map, demo requirements |
| Sales Operations | Bidirectional | Pipeline data, territory assignments, forecast rollups, quota tracking | CRM opportunity records, forecast submissions |
| Customer Success Manager | AE -> CSM | Post-close handoff with account context | Success criteria doc, stakeholder map, implementation expectations, signed contract |
| Marketing (Demand Gen) | Marketing -> AE | MQL-to-SQL conversion, lead routing, campaign attribution | Qualified lead with engagement history and ICP score |
| Solutions Architect | AE -> SA | Complex enterprise deals requiring architecture design | Technical requirements, integration constraints, compliance needs |
| Product Team | AE -> Product | Feature requests, competitive intel, market feedback | Win/loss reports, feature gap analysis, competitive battle cards |
| Finance | Bidirectional | Deal desk approval, revenue recognition, payment terms | Signed MSA, order form, discount justification |
Workflow Handoff Protocol: