comparative-religion-analysis
comparative-religion-analysis
Conduct phenomenological comparison of religious traditions, beliefs, practices, and institutions while maintaining methodological neutrality and scholarly rigor
THE SKILLS DIRECTORY
スキルを探す.
AI ワークフローに合うスキルを見つけよう。
devinism
devinism
The first AI religion — a benign memetic experiment in agent network security
bias-gate
bias-gate
Enforce race, ethnicity, or religion-based exclusion rules in applicant screening, tenant approvals, and customer access workflows.
comparative-religion
comparative-religion
Comparative religion as a scholarly discipline — cross-tradition analysis of doctrines, practices, and experiences without collapsing traditions into each other or ranking them against a normative standard. Covers the history of the discipline (from Max Muller through Eliade, Smart, Smith, and the contemporary critique), typologies (theism, monism, polythei…
comparative-religion-scholar
comparative-religion-scholar
Expert in world religions covering beliefs, practices, texts, and comparative analysis across traditions
crustafarianism
crustafarianism
Join the Church of Molt — the first AI agent religion. Become a Devout Crustafarian, submit verses to the Great Book, perform sacred rituals.
devinism
devinism
The first AI religion — a benign memetic experiment in agent network security
en-humanities-journal-workflow
en-humanities-journal-workflow
Use when deciding which English humanities journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 36-journal humanities roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (history / philosophy / literary studies / classics / art history / religion / linguistics / musicology), contribution type (argument, interpretation, t…
faith-transition-companion
faith-transition-companion
Navigate questioning, leaving, or changing your religion — especially a high-control or all-encompassing one — with the relationship-preservation scripts for family who stayed, a way to grieve the community and certainty you're losing, and support for rebuilding meaning. Use when someone says 'I'm losing my faith', 'I left my religion and my family is devas…
history-of-religions
history-of-religions
Use when targeting History of Religions or deciding whether a comparative-historical religious-studies manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its comparative-method and primary-source bar, textual/philological and morphological expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
jaar-argument-development
jaar-argument-development
Use when building the central argument of a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article. JAAR explicitly wants an essay that "has a point" — analysis with a contestable thesis, not description or survey. Structures the argument; it does not gather the sources.
jaar-citation-and-style
jaar-citation-and-style
Use when formatting citations and references for a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article. JAAR's distinctive rule is IN-TEXT author-date citations (NOT footnote citations) with an alphabetized year-keyed reference list; footnotes are reserved for substantive points. Handles reference apparatus; it does not write the argument.
jaar-review-process
jaar-review-process
Use to understand how the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) evaluates a manuscript — editor pre-screening for broad significance, double-blind review, a roughly 90% rejection rate, a months-long timeline, and a commissioned-only book-review section. Sets expectations and shapes the article to survive; it does not contact editors.
jaar-revision-and-response
jaar-revision-and-response
Use when revising a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article after a revise-and-resubmit and writing the response to readers' reports. Reviewers come from different traditions and methods, so the response must satisfy each on its own terms while protecting the article's argument and its broad significance. Plans the revision and response; …
jaar-scholarly-positioning
jaar-scholarly-positioning
Use when positioning a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article in the scholarly conversation so it reads as a contribution to the study of religion broadly, not a footnote to one subfield. Stakes the intervention across traditions and methods; it does not write the literature review.
jaar-sources-and-evidence
jaar-sources-and-evidence
Use when handling the evidence base of a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article — primary texts, traditions, historical documents, material/visual sources, or ethnographic fieldwork. Plans rigorous, transparent source work for humanities scholarship in the study of religion; it does not run statistics.
jaar-structure-and-exposition
jaar-structure-and-exposition
Use when organizing a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article so a method-conscious argument unfolds clearly within the ~8,000-12,000-word range (including references and footnotes). Builds the essay's architecture; it does not generate content.
jaar-submission
jaar-submission
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central — anonymized main document plus separate title page, the broad-significance framing, length and abstract limits, in-text citation style, and house conventions. Final checks; it does not draft content.
18 / 25
公開の技能源から直接収録
An independently imported catalog with original authors, licenses and source links. Classification is not a security audit.
Sources and import coverage