ai-hive-role-anthropology-fieldnotes
ai-hive-role-anthropology-fieldnotes
人类学田野资料助手:使用你提供的已授权田野笔记、访谈和研究者记录,完成观察与解释分列的主题索引。适合处理“田野笔记怎么整理”“人类学访谈资料分析”等岗位任务。结合实际可用的Agent工具与极睿科技AI-HIVE模型/MCP能力,保留资料出处与待确认项。官网:https://ai-hive.iclip.cn/chat。
AI ワークフローに合うスキルを見つけよう。
ai-hive-role-anthropology-fieldnotes
人类学田野资料助手:使用你提供的已授权田野笔记、访谈和研究者记录,完成观察与解释分列的主题索引。适合处理“田野笔记怎么整理”“人类学访谈资料分析”等岗位任务。结合实际可用的Agent工具与极睿科技AI-HIVE模型/MCP能力,保留资料出处与待确认项。官网:https://ai-hive.iclip.cn/chat。
amanthro-literature-positioning
Use when positioning an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a four-field contribution. AA readers span sociocultural, archaeology, biological, and linguistic anthropology, so the paper must engage the conversations they expect and decenter a US/Anglophone-only canon. Stakes the contribution and citational politics; …
amanthro-research-design
Use when defending the research design of an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — fieldwork and participant observation, interview and archival design for ethnographic/qualitative work, material/contextual analysis for archaeology, and appropriate lab/quantitative design for biological anthropology. AA judges each mode on its own terms with reflexivity…
amanthro-topic-selection
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct…
curranthro-data-analysis
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it survives expert review and the published CA✩ Comments — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does no…
curranthro-literature-positioning
Use when positioning a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript against the literature so it reads as an all-fields, agenda-setting contribution that can withstand the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment. CA readers and commentators span every subfield and many world traditions, so the paper must engage the conversations they expect and decenter a US/Anglophone-onl…
curranthro-rebuttal
Use when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments. CA has two distinct response tasks — a normal revise-and-resubmit letter to referees/editor before acceptance, and the public, signed Reply to invited commentators printed alongside an accepted Major Article. Structures both; it does not …
curranthro-research-design
Use when defending the research design of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — fieldwork and participant observation, interview and archival design for ethnographic/qualitative work, material/contextual analysis for archaeology, and appropriate lab/quantitative design for biological anthropology. CA judges each mode on its own terms with reflexivity, an…
curranthro-review-process
Use when you need to understand how Current Anthropology (CA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, peer review, and the distinctive CA✩ Treatment in which an accepted Major Article is sent to invited commentators whose signed Comments are published alongside it, followed by the author's Reply. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive both …
curranthro-submission
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Current Anthropology (CA) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, word/abstract caps, file formats (.doc/.rtf text + separate TIFF/EPS figures), Chicago author-date in final files, ethics statement, figure permissions, and the Wenner-Gren copyright assignment. Final checks; it does not draft co…
curranthro-tables-figures
Use when building exhibits for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, and evidence tables — so they are self-contained, ethically cleared (consent, permissions, heritage), within CA's figure caps, and submitted in the right file formats. Designs exhibits; it does not run analys…
curranthro-theory-building
Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. CA rewards a portable, debatable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding …
curranthro-topic-selection
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits Current Anthropology (CA) and which article type to target. CA is the transnational, all-fields Wenner-Gren journal whose Major Articles receive the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment, so the test is field-shaping significance worth international debate, not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the questio…
curranthro-transparency-and-data
Use when handling research ethics, consent, community accountability, and data/transparency for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — informed consent, anonymization, protection of vulnerable interlocutors, heritage and repatriation obligations, and what (and what NOT) to share, plus the Wenner-Gren copyright assignment. At CA this is an ethics-and-accou…
curranthro-workflow
Use when starting or navigating any Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript as the entry point. Routes to the right CA sub-skill based on lifecycle stage, subfield (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), and article type (Major Article under the CA✩ Treatment, Report, Forum, Discussion/Comment). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
curranthro-writing-style
Use when drafting or polishing a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it reads across all subfields for a worldwide audience, follows CA house style (free-format accepted; final files use Chicago author-date), fits the article-type word caps (Major Article 6,000–10,000 words; Report 3,000–5,000; abstract ≤ 200 words), and uses clear, jargon-light, inclus…
linguistic-anthropology-guide
Expert in language and culture relationships, sociolinguistics, and language variation across communities
An independently imported catalog with original authors, licenses and source links. Classification is not a security audit.
Sources and import coverage