UI はローカライズ済みです。スキルの紹介と説明文書は選択した言語へ AI が自動翻訳し、コード・コマンド・パス・専門用語は原文のままです。原作者の文書が優先されます。
スキルを探す
生産性・共同作業 · SKILL.md

benchmark-evaluation

benchmark-evaluation

Plan StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluations and two-environment policy-server flows without launching simulators.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

スキルの説明

GitHub

name: benchmark-evaluation description: "Plan StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluations and two-environment policy-server flows without launching simulators." disable-model-invocation: true metadata: disco-role: operating license: NOASSERTION

benchmark-evaluation

Use this sub-skill when a task asks how to plan, audit, or dry-run a StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluation. It covers LIBERO, SimplerEnv, RoboCasa, RoboTwin, DOMINO, BEHAVIOR, VLA-Arena, Calvin, RoboDojo, and closely related benchmark wrappers.

This skill is for safe planning. Do not start a policy server, download datasets/checkpoints, launch simulators, patch third-party repositories, or run benchmark-scale scripts unless the user explicitly asks for execution and the required environments are prepared.

Route first

  • Policy server internals, websocket/ZMQ protocol details, server response schemas, or client contract failures: policy-deployment.
  • Training command construction, YAML overrides, Accelerate/DeepSpeed, checkpoint production, or resume logic: training-config.
  • Dataset registry, LeRobot modality files, data mixtures, or statistics creation: data-integration.
  • Benchmark flow selection, two-terminal planning, simulator readiness, result/log/video expectations, and benchmark caveats: stay here.

Operating checklist

  1. Identify the benchmark family and whether the user wants planning only, a safe dry run, or actual evaluation.
  2. Confirm the policy-serving environment and simulator environment are separate unless the benchmark explicitly provides a safe local mock. Actual simulator evaluations normally require two terminals/process groups: one for StarVLA policy serving and one for the benchmark client.
  3. Collect placeholders before any execution: checkpoint path, host, port, device/GPU allocation, simulator project directory, benchmark data/assets, task/suite/mode, output directory, unnorm_key, and expected action chunk/replanning cadence.
  4. Use scripts/plan_benchmark_eval.py to print a safe plan for a named benchmark. This script only emits checklists; it never launches servers, downloads assets, or imports simulator packages.
  5. Consult references/evaluation-protocols.md for terminal roles and data contracts.
  6. Consult references/simulation-benchmarks.md for benchmark-specific readiness and caveats.
  7. Consult references/troubleshooting.md for common failure triage.

Key operating facts

  • Current StarVLA websocket clients should request server-side unnormalization by passing unnorm_key and should consume response["data"]["actions"], not hand-roll unnormalization from normalized_actions.
  • Clients should use server metadata for action_chunk_size instead of recomputing it from checkpoint config. Action chunk mismatch often looks like poor policy behavior rather than a hard error.
  • A checkpoint path has multiple roles: policy-server model loading, client-side run/result naming, and sometimes local access to metadata. It is not a substitute for benchmark data/assets.
  • Source benchmark launchers are reference-only by default because they may start long-running servers, simulators, downloads, GPU jobs, or third-party bootstrap steps.
  • If a protocol-level failure appears, stop benchmark triage and route to policy-deployment.
保存したスキル