review-web-designReview web design → layout, typo, color, spacing, responsive, brand, hierarchy. Use → mockup pre-dev, implemented site quality, design review, brand check, breakpoint test.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Eval web design → visual quality, consistency, cross-device.
Guides eye → importance.
## Visual Hierarchy Assessment
| Page/Section | Focal Point | Hierarchy Clear? | Issues |
|-------------|-------------|-----------------|--------|
| Homepage | Hero section CTA | Yes | Secondary CTA competes with primary |
| Product page | Product image | Mostly | Price not prominent enough |
| Contact form | Submit button | No | Form title same size as body text |
→ Each page assessed.
If err: no mockups → live code via dev tools.
/* Example well-structured type scale (1.25 ratio) */
:root {
--text-xs: 0.64rem; /* 10.24px */
--text-sm: 0.8rem; /* 12.8px */
--text-base: 1rem; /* 16px */
--text-lg: 1.25rem; /* 20px */
--text-xl: 1.563rem; /* 25px */
--text-2xl: 1.953rem; /* 31.25px */
--text-3xl: 2.441rem; /* 39.06px */
}
→ Typo consistent, readable, hierarchical.
If err: >3 families → consolidate.
## Colour Assessment
| Usage | Colour | Contrast Ratio | WCAG AA | Notes |
|-------|--------|----------------|---------|-------|
| Body text on white | #333333 | 12.6:1 | Pass | Good |
| Link text on white | #2563eb | 5.2:1 | Pass | Good |
| Muted text on light gray | #9ca3af on #f3f4f6 | 2.1:1 | FAIL | Increase contrast |
| CTA button text | #ffffff on #22c55e | 3.1:1 | FAIL for small text | Use darker green or larger text |
→ Palette coherent + accessible + semantic.
If err: contrast checker tool (WebAIM).
## Spacing Consistency Check
| Element Pair | Expected Gap | Actual Gap | Consistent? |
|-------------|-------------|------------|-------------|
| Section title to content | 24px | 24px | Yes |
| Card to card | 16px | 16px/24px | No — inconsistent |
| Form label to input | 8px | 4px/8px/12px | No — varies |
→ Systematic grid + spacing.
If err: inconsistent → adopt scale (Tailwind space-*).
| Breakpoint | Width | Represents |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE / small phones |
| Mobile L | 428px | iPhone 14 / large phones |
| Tablet | 768px | iPad portrait |
| Desktop | 1280px | Standard laptop |
| Wide | 1536px+ | Desktop monitor |
Per breakpoint:
## Responsive Review
| Breakpoint | Layout | Touch Targets | Text | Images | Navigation | Issues |
|-----------|--------|---------------|------|--------|------------|--------|
| 375px | OK | OK | OK | Overflow on hero | Hamburger | Hero image clips |
| 768px | OK | OK | OK | OK | Hamburger | None |
| 1280px | OK | N/A | OK | OK | Full nav | None |
| 1536px | OK | N/A | Line length too long | OK | Full nav | Add max-width to content |
→ All breakpoints tested + documented.
If err: no tools → review CSS media queries.
→ Brand verified vs guidelines.
If err: no guidelines → note + assess internal consistency.
## Web Design Review
### Overall Impression
[2-3 sentences: overall quality, strongest and weakest aspects]
### Visual Hierarchy: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Typography: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Colour: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Layout & Spacing: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Responsive Design: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Brand Consistency: [Score/5]
[Key findings with specific references]
### Priority Improvements
1. [Most impactful change — specific and actionable]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Positive Notes
1. [What works well and should be preserved]
→ Specific, visual-reference feedback + prioritized improvements.
If err: scoring arbitrary → pass|concern|fail.
review-ux-ui — usability + interaction + accesssetup-tailwind-typescript — Tailwind CSS implscaffold-nextjs-app — Next.js scaffold