executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
jev-proseCheck prose with Jev for narrow AI-writing patterns and revise from its feedback. Use when asked for Jev prose checks, AI-pattern cleanup, or an ongoing check-and-rewrite loop while writing sentences or paragraphs.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Use the jev-prose CLI to get independent, probabilistic editorial feedback.
It checks patterns, not authorship. The writer makes the editorial decisions.
Run jev-prose --help to check availability. From a claude-code-tools checkout,
install with uv tool install ./packages/jev-prose. The package carries the
persistent question bank; no global skill source paths are needed at runtime.
If no checkout or installed CLI is available, report that prerequisite rather
than substituting self-review for a Jev result.
Default authentication is CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID and CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN,
or an existing sysone account configuration and Wrangler login. The backend is
hosted Jev; the text and optional context are sent there. A configured alternative
can be selected with --backend typesafe or --url and --model. Do not print
secrets. An authentication or billing failure stops the loop.
For each requested sentence, paragraph, or short section:
jev-prose check draft.txt --profile general > report.json. For papers,
specifications, and formal technical prose use --profile formal. Use
strict only when requested; it adds personal editorial preferences.
Optional --audience, --voice, and --context context.txt help avoid false
positives. Keep these settings and the threshold fixed throughout the loop.ran: true, ok: true, and answered == expected.
Exit 2, missing output, malformed JSON, or an incomplete check stops the loop
as an error; never label the draft clean in those cases.status is clean, stop. Otherwise inspect the flagged questions and
guidance against the actual draft. A high probability is not a command to
edit: dismiss an inapplicable flag with a brief reason. Jev provides no
evidence spans; locate the passage yourself without pretending it supplied
an exact quote. Combine overlapping findings into one targeted revision.Preserve substantive claims as well as individual facts. If addressing a finding would weaken, strengthen, remove, or otherwise change a conclusion, leave the claim intact and report the finding unresolved unless the user has authorized factual or argument changes. An unsupported claim is not permission to silently replace the author's intended claim with a different one.
Do not change thresholds to obtain a clean result. Do not add invented examples, anecdotes, feelings, measurements, sources, or stronger claims. Do not remove necessary qualifications or factual content to lower the number of flags. Check meaning against the original after each revision; undo any harmful edit.
A sentence check cannot establish document-level structure. If asked to use this while writing a document, check each completed paragraph and then the finished short section for repetition. Respect the 24,000-character input limit; do not silently truncate. This workflow runs when invoked; it installs no automatic hook.
Return the revised prose in the requested form. Briefly report the number of revisions, check outcome, and any unresolved/dismissed findings. If every finding was dismissed, say that explicitly instead of reporting a model-clean result. Keep detector reports out of published prose unless requested.