---

name: cc-skill-strategic-compact compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

• guidance
• examples
• do-dont description: Implements intelligent cc skill strategic compact with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: cc-skill-strategic-compact, cc skill strategic compact, how do i cc-skill-strategic-compact, orchestrate cc-skill-strategic-compact, automate cc-skill-strategic-compact, agent cc-skill-strategic-compact archetypes:
  • orchestration
  • strategic anti_triggers:
  • brainstorming
  • vague ideation
  • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

---

Cc Skill Strategic Compact

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for cc skill strategic compact workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

• Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
• Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
• Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
• Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
• Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
• Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
• Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
• Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
• Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
• Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
• Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
• Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
• Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

• Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
• High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
• Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
• Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

   • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
   • Historical success rate for similar tasks
   • Skill availability and health status
   • Required dependencies and their availability

   Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

   • Retry with adjusted parameters
   • Try alternative skill from related-skills
   • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

   Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def evaluate_strategic_compact(
    task_context: Dict[str, Any],
    available_compacts: List[Dict[str, Any]],
    min_confidence: float = 0.75
) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
    """Evaluate available skill compacts against the current task context.
    
    Implements Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable) by validating
    compact schemas before scoring. Uses multi-factor scoring to determine
    the optimal strategic compact for the request.
    """
    if not task_context.get("intent") or not available_compacts:
        raise ValueError("Task intent and available compacts are required")
        
    task_features = _extract_intent_features(task_context["intent"])
    best_compact = None
    best_score = 0.0
    
    for compact in available_compacts:
        # Law 1: Early exit for disabled/deprecated compacts
        if compact.get("status") in ("disabled", "deprecated"):
            continue
            
        match_score = _calculate_text_similarity(task_features, compact.get("triggers", []))
        history_score = compact.get("historical_success_rate", 0.0)
        availability_score = 1.0 if compact.get("health") == "healthy" else 0.5
        
        composite_score = (match_score * 0.5) + (history_score * 0.3) + (availability_score * 0.2)
        
        if composite_score > best_score and composite_score >= min_confidence:
            best_score = composite_score
            best_compact = compact
            
    if best_compact is None:
        return None
        
    # Law 3: Atomic Predictability - return fresh dict
    return {
        "compact_id": best_compact["id"],
        "confidence": best_score,
        "selected_at": time.time(),
        "fallback_chain": best_compact.get("fallbacks", [])
    }

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_compact_with_fallback(
    compact_config: Dict[str, Any],
    execution_context: Dict[str, Any],
    max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    """Execute a strategic compact with built-in resilience patterns.
    
    Follows Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) by immediately halting on
    invalid state errors and routing transient failures through the
    configured fallback chain.
    """
    if not compact_config.get("steps"):
        raise CompactExecutionError("Compact must define at least one execution step")
        
    validated_context = _validate_compact_inputs(execution_context, compact_config)
    attempt = 0
    
    while attempt <= max_retries:
        try:
            result = _run_compact_steps(compact_config["steps"], validated_context)
            return {
                "status": "success",
                "compact_id": compact_config["id"],
                "output": result,
                "attempts": attempt + 1,
                "latency_ms": time.time() * 1000
            }
        except InvalidStateError as e:
            # Law 4: Fail immediately on invalid state
            raise CompactExecutionError(f"Invalid state in compact {compact_config['id']}: {e}") from e
        except TransientError as e:
            attempt += 1
            if attempt > max_retries:
                return _apply_compact_fallback(compact_config, validated_context)
                
    # Fallback exhausted
    return {
        "status": "fallback_triggered",
        "compact_id": compact_config["id"],
        "fallback_result": _route_to_human_operator(compact_config, validated_context)
    }

MUST DO

• Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
• Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
• Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
• Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
• Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
• Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

• Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
• Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
• Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
• Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
• Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
• Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

• Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
• Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
• Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
• Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
• Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
• Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
• Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

• Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
• Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
• Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
• Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
• Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
• Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
• Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
• Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios

---

---

Constraints

MUST DO

• Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
• Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
• Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
• Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

• Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
• Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
• Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
• Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

• Strategic Management Theory (Porter's Five Forces)
• Business Model Canvas (Strategyzer)
• OKR Framework Guide (Google)
• Decision Matrix Methods
• SWOT Analysis in Strategic Planning

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |