UI はローカライズ済みです。スキルの紹介と説明文書は選択した言語へ AI が自動翻訳し、コード・コマンド・パス・専門用語は原文のままです。原作者の文書が優先されます。
スキルを探す
生産性・共同作業 · SKILL.md

give-hard-feedback-kindly

give-hard-feedback-kindly

Give someone difficult feedback — a report, a peer, a friend — so it actually lands and helps, without crushing them or dodging the point. Use when asked how do I give hard feedback, tell someone something difficult, address a problem with someone, or have a tough conversation about their [work/behavior]. Produces a read on what you actually need to say (th…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

スキルの説明

GitHub

name: give-hard-feedback-kindly description: "Give someone difficult feedback — a report, a peer, a friend — so it actually lands and helps, without crushing them or dodging the point. Use when asked how do I give hard feedback, tell someone something difficult, address a problem with someone, or have a tough conversation about their [work/behavior]. Produces a read on what you actually need to say (the specific behavior and its impact, not a vague vibe), a structure that's direct and kind at once, the exact opening and words, how to invite their side and land on a path forward, and the traps (sandwiching it away, going vague, making it about character)."

Give Hard Feedback Kindly

Most people botch hard feedback two ways: they soften it until the point disappears (kind but useless), or they deliver it bluntly and defensively (clear but wounding). The skill is doing both at once — direct and caring. This helps you pin down the specific thing to say, structure it so it lands and helps, and handle their reaction — so the person leaves clear on what to change and still intact.

What This Skill Produces

  • The actual message — the specific behavior and its concrete impact (not a vague "you need to improve" or a mood)
  • A direct-and-kind structure — care for the person + clarity on the problem, without the compliment-sandwich that buries it
  • The opening and words — how to start (signal it's constructive, get to the point) and the specific phrasing
  • Space for their side — how to invite their perspective genuinely, not as a formality
  • A path forward — what good looks like and the concrete next step, so it's help, not just criticism
  • The traps — sandwiching the point into oblivion, going vague to avoid discomfort, and attacking character instead of behavior

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The issue — the specific behavior/problem (push for specifics if it's vague)
  • The impact — what it's actually affecting (why it matters)
  • The relationship — report, peer, boss, friend, family (changes tone and standing)
  • History — first time raising it, or a pattern
  • Your goal — change the behavior while keeping the relationship

Framework: Direct And Kind, About Behavior

  1. Get specific. Vague feedback ("be more professional") can't be acted on and feels like an attack — pin the exact behavior and its concrete impact.
  2. Care and be clear at once. Genuine care for the person and directness about the problem — not one softened by the other. Skip the compliment sandwich that hides the message.
  3. Open honestly, get to the point. Signal it's meant constructively, then say the thing — burying the lede prolongs the discomfort and confuses them.
  4. Attack the behavior, not the character. "When X happened, the impact was Y" lands; "you're careless/lazy" wounds and triggers defense.
  5. Invite their side. Ask genuinely for their perspective — you may be missing context, and it makes it a conversation, not a verdict.
  6. Land on a path forward. End with what good looks like and a concrete next step — feedback without a path is just criticism.

Output Format

Hard feedback: [the issue] · to [person] · [relationship]

What to actually say: [the specific behavior + its concrete impact]. Open with: [signal constructive intent + get to the point]. The message (direct + kind):

[Behavior + impact, plainly and caringly — no sandwich, no character attack]. Invite their side: "[genuine ask for their perspective]". Path forward: [what good looks like + the concrete next step]. Avoid: compliment-sandwiching it away · vagueness · making it about who they are.

Quality Checks

  • The feedback is specific (behavior + impact), not vague
  • It's direct and kind at once, without a burying sandwich
  • Opens honestly and gets to the point
  • Targets behavior, not character
  • Genuinely invites the person's perspective
  • Ends with a concrete path forward

Anti-Patterns

  • The compliment sandwich that hides the message.
  • Vagueness to avoid discomfort ("just do better").
  • Character attacks ("you're lazy") instead of behavior.
  • No path forward — criticism with no next step.
  • Not inviting their side — a verdict, not a conversation.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "I need to give a team member hard feedback about missed deadlines."
  • "How do I tell a friend something difficult without hurting them?"
  • "Help me address a problem with a coworker's behavior."
  • "I have to have a tough conversation about someone's work. What do I say?"
  • "How do I give critical feedback that actually lands?"
保存したスキル