UI はローカライズ済みです。スキルの紹介と説明文書は選択した言語へ AI が自動翻訳し、コード・コマンド・パス・専門用語は原文のままです。原作者の文書が優先されます。
スキルを探す
データ・研究 · SKILL.md

seo-keyword-strategist

seo-keyword-strategist

Use when researching keywords, mapping search intent, building topic clusters, detecting keyword cannibalization, or optimizing content for entity-based search. Covers keyword strategy, intent classification, clustering, and cannibalization diagnosis.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

スキルの説明

GitHub

name: seo-keyword-strategist description: Use when researching keywords, mapping search intent, building topic clusters, detecting keyword cannibalization, or optimizing content for entity-based search. Covers keyword strategy, intent classification, clustering, and cannibalization diagnosis. family: seo

SEO Keyword Strategist

Overview

Keywords are entity pointers, not density targets. Google's Knowledge Graph holds 54+ billion entities and 1.6+ trillion facts. Modern keyword strategy is about mapping content to entities and intent, not counting keyword occurrences.

Dead Metrics — Stop Using These

MythReality
Keyword density 0.5-1.5%No correlation with rankings (2026 study, 1,536 results). Google uses NLP, not word counting
LSI keywordsConfirmed myth. John Mueller: "There's no such thing as LSI keywords." Use "semantically related terms" instead
Content scoring tools predict rankingsCorrelation 0.17-0.30 (weak). Use for gap finding, not score chasing
Search volume is accurateGoogle Keyword Planner overestimates 54% of the time. Use volumes as directional only

Intent Classification

Intent% of SearchesContent TypeAI Overview Risk
Informational52.65%Guides, how-tos, explainersHIGH — AI answers directly
Navigational32.15%Brand/product pagesLOW — users want specific site
Commercial14.51%Comparisons, reviews, "best X"MEDIUM — sweet spot for clicks
Transactional0.69%Product/checkout pagesLOW — users want to buy

Priority: Target commercial intent keywords — high conversion potential, not fully absorbed by AI Overviews. Informational head terms are increasingly zero-click (58.5% US, 83% when AI Overviews appear).

Entity-First Keyword Strategy

Google shifted from "strings" to "things." Optimize for entities, not keyword strings.

Three pillars:

  1. Precision — Each page = one canonical entity. Align title, H1, and schema mainEntityOfPage
  2. Coverage — Site collectively covers all subtopics that define your niche (topical authority)
  3. Connectivity — Internal links mirror Knowledge Graph entity relationships

Practical steps:

  • Place primary keyword in title, H1, first paragraph, and 1-2 subheadings naturally
  • Cover expected subtopics comprehensively (check People Also Ask for gaps)
  • Use schema markup to explicitly declare entities (Product, Organization, etc.)
  • Write for meaning, not matching — Google's NLP (BERT, MUM, Gemini) understands synonyms and context

Keyword Clustering

SERP-based clustering is the gold standard. If 3+ of the same URLs appear in top 10 for two keywords, they belong in one cluster.

Rule: One search intent = one keyword cluster = one page.

Method:

  1. Collect target keywords
  2. Check SERP overlap (same pages ranking = same cluster)
  3. Verify intent alignment (informational vs commercial)
  4. Assign one cluster per page — never create separate pages for keywords in the same cluster

Cannibalization Detection

Not every instance of multiple pages ranking for the same keyword is a problem. Ahrefs reports 9,700 cases on their own site — almost none need fixing.

It's a problem when:

  • Pages swap positions 3+ times in 7 days (red flag)
  • Rankings drop 5-15 positions when "wrong" page is selected
  • CTR is split between pages serving identical intent

It's NOT a problem when:

  • Both pages rank stably in top positions
  • Pages serve different intents (blog post = informational, product page = transactional)
  • Total traffic from both exceeds what one page would get

Detection via GSC API:

Query dimensions: ["query", "page"]
Group by query → count distinct pages
Flag: queries where count(page) > 1 AND positions swap frequently

Resolution decision:

SignalAction
Position swapping, same intentConsolidate — merge weaker into stronger, 301 redirect. Case studies show +200-466% traffic
Different intents, both stableLeave it — keyword diversification is beneficial
Same intent, one clearly dominantRe-optimize — change weaker page to target different cluster

Zero-Click Strategy

58.5% of US searches result in zero clicks. When AI Overviews appear, 83% zero-click.

  • For informational keywords: optimize for AI Overview citation as brand visibility (even without clicks)
  • For commercial keywords: these retain higher CTR — prioritize them
  • Track CTR alongside rankings — #1 with 0.6% CTR on an AIO query may be less valuable than #5 without AIO

Anti-Patterns

Don'tWhy
Target keyword density percentagesDead metric — no ranking correlation
Use "LSI keyword" toolsLSI is a myth; use topical gap analysis instead
Chase content scoring tool numbers0.17-0.30 correlation; score ≠ ranking
Trust search volume precision54% overestimated; use as directional only
Create separate pages for same-cluster keywordsCauses cannibalization; one cluster = one page
Treat all multi-page rankings as cannibalizationOften beneficial; check for actual harm first
Ignore zero-click data58.5% of searches get no clicks; factor into strategy
保存したスキル