---

name: bio-workflows-genome-annotation-pipeline description: Orchestrates genome annotation from assembled contigs to functional annotation, forking prokaryotic (Bakta one-step, genetic-code table from GTDB-Tk) vs eukaryotic (RepeatMask -> BRAKER3 -> functional -> ncRNA), then eggNOG/InterProScan functional assignment and Infernal/tRNAscan ncRNA. Use when committing the pro-vs-eukaryotic path and the genetic-code table from taxonomy (never guessing), annotating ONLY a decontaminated QC-passed assembly (CheckM2 before prokaryotic annotation is non-negotiable), committing the evidence set (RNA-seq + protein drives BRAKER3 training), soft-masking with a curated repeat library before gene prediction, or pinning the tool + DB version for any pangenome comparison. Hands mechanism to the genome-annotation component skills; not a re-teach of any single step. tool_type: mixed primary_tool: Bakta goal_approach_exempt: true workflow: true depends_on:

• genome-annotation/prokaryotic-annotation
• genome-annotation/eukaryotic-gene-prediction
• genome-annotation/repeat-annotation
• genome-annotation/functional-annotation
• genome-annotation/ncrna-annotation
• genome-annotation/annotation-qc
• genome-assembly/assembly-qc qc_checkpoints:
• after_repeat_masking: "Repeat content within expected range for taxon"
• after_gene_prediction: "Gene count plausible, BUSCO completeness >90%"
• after_functional_annotation: ">60% of genes with functional assignment"

---

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: BRAKER3 3.0+, BUSCO 5.5+, Bakta 1.9+, Infernal 1.1+, InterProScan 5.66+, Prokka 1.14+, RepeatMasker 4.1+, RepeatModeler 2.0.4+ (-threads replaced -pa in 2.0.4), eggNOG-mapper 2.1+, pandas 2.2+, tRNAscan-SE 2.0+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

• Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
• CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Genome Annotation Pipeline

"Annotate my genome assembly" -> Orchestrate prokaryotic (Bakta) or eukaryotic (BRAKER3) gene prediction, repeat masking (RepeatMasker), functional annotation (eggNOG-mapper, InterProScan), and ncRNA annotation (Infernal).

This is a workflow skill: it owns the chaining decisions and hand-offs, not the internals of any one step.

The governing principle

A gene set is ~95% right and 100% confident; its trustworthiness is decided at four seams, not inside the gene-finder.

1. Pro- vs eukaryotic is THE fork, committed from taxonomy up front, and it fixes the genetic-code table. Prokaryote -> Bakta one-step (verify the genetic-code TABLE from GTDB-Tk classification, never guess — a Mycoplasma under table 11 splits every gene at internal UGA). Eukaryote -> multi-step RepeatMask -> BRAKER3 -> functional -> ncRNA. There is no general-purpose eukaryote annotator: alternative genetic codes, trans-splicing, and polycistronic transcription break standard pipelines.
2. Annotate ONLY a decontaminated, QC-passed assembly. CheckM2 before prokaryotic annotation is non-negotiable: contamination >5% mixes two organisms' genes into one chimeric set; a gene-finder trained on a contaminated/fragmented assembly produces confidently-wrong models genome-wide that are invisible in the GFF3. Annotation quality is bounded above by assembly quality.
3. The evidence set is a committed input, not an afterthought. Eukaryotic: RNA-seq BAM + protein (OrthoDB) evidence drives BRAKER3's high-confidence training-set mining (the real advance — learning from loci where transcripts AND homology agree). Committing RNA-seq (ideally Iso-Seq for isoforms+UTRs) is decided at project design; without it the annotation is one-isoform, CDS-only, UTR-less and silently poisons AS/3'-tag/APA analyses.
4. Tool + DB version + date is a reproducibility commitment. Bakta's DB is versioned (record it); Prokka's is frozen ~2019 (a post-2019 gene is "hypothetical" in Prokka, "named" in Bakta — accessory-vs-core flips on tool vintage alone). For any comparison, re-annotate everyone with ONE pipeline + ONE DB version from FASTA.

Made-once commitments

Commitment	Consequence inherited downstream
Pro- vs eukaryotic path + genetic-code table (from taxonomy)	The whole tool chain; a wrong code table splits genes at recoded stops
Decontaminated, QC-passed assembly (CheckM2 gate)	Chimeric gene set / genome-wide corrupt training if skipped; annotation quality is bounded by assembly quality
Evidence set (RNA-seq + protein)	BRAKER3 training quality; without RNA-seq the annotation is isoform-naive, UTR-less
Tool + DB version	Named-vs-hypothetical and accessory-vs-core flip on tool vintage; re-annotate all with one version for comparison

Pipeline Overview

Assembled contigs
    |
    v
[0. Assembly QC] ----------> QUAST, BUSCO (confirm assembly quality)
    |
    +----- Prokaryotic? -----> Path A: Bakta (one-step annotation)
    |                                |
    |                                v
    |                          Annotated genome (GFF3, GenBank, FASTA)
    |
    +----- Eukaryotic? ------> Path B: Multi-step pipeline
                                    |
                                    v
                              [1. Repeat Masking] ----> RepeatModeler + RepeatMasker
                                    |
                                    v
                              [2. Gene Prediction] ---> BRAKER3 (RNA-seq + protein evidence)
                                    |
                                    v
                              [3. Functional Annotation] -> eggNOG-mapper + InterProScan
                                    |
                                    v
                              [4. ncRNA Annotation] ---> Infernal + tRNAscan-SE
                                    |
                                    v
                              Annotated genome (GFF3, proteins, functional tables)

Path A: Prokaryotic Annotation (Bakta)

Bakta provides comprehensive one-step annotation for bacteria and archaea. Preferred over Prokka for new projects.

Database Setup

bakta_db download --output /path/to/bakta_db --type full

Run Bakta

bakta \
    --db /path/to/bakta_db \
    --output bakta_out \
    --prefix my_genome \
    --locus-tag MYORG \
    --genus Escherichia --species "coli" \
    --strain K12 \
    --gram - \
    --translation-table 11 \
    --threads 8 \
    assembly.fasta
# Set --translation-table from the GTDB-Tk classification, never a guess: table 11 for most
# bacteria, but --translation-table 4 for Mycoplasma/Spiroplasma (UGA = Trp, not stop) --
# annotating a Mycoplasma under table 11 splits every gene at its internal UGA codons.
# Add --complete ONLY for finished replicons; omit it for draft contigs (the common input).

Prokaryotic QC Checkpoint

import subprocess
import json

def validate_prokaryotic_annotation(bakta_dir, prefix, expected_cds_range=(500, 8000)):
    '''
    QC gates for prokaryotic annotation.
    - CDS count in expected range for genome size
    - tRNA count >= 20 (typical minimum for free-living bacteria)
    - rRNA operons detected
    '''
    gff_file = f'{bakta_dir}/{prefix}.gff3'

    feature_counts = {'CDS': 0, 'tRNA': 0, 'rRNA': 0, 'tmRNA': 0, 'ncRNA': 0}
    with open(gff_file) as f:
        for line in f:
            if line.startswith('#'):
                continue
            fields = line.strip().split('\t')
            if len(fields) >= 3 and fields[2] in feature_counts:
                feature_counts[fields[2]] += 1

    qc_pass = True
    if not (expected_cds_range[0] <= feature_counts['CDS'] <= expected_cds_range[1]):
        print(f'WARNING: CDS count {feature_counts["CDS"]} outside expected range {expected_cds_range}')
        qc_pass = False
    if feature_counts['tRNA'] < 20:
        print(f'WARNING: Only {feature_counts["tRNA"]} tRNAs detected (expect >= 20)')
        qc_pass = False

    print(f'Feature summary: {feature_counts}')
    return qc_pass, feature_counts

Path B: Eukaryotic Annotation

Step 1: Repeat Masking

# Build the RepeatModeler database FIRST, then the species-specific library
BuildDatabase -name mygenome assembly.fasta
RepeatModeler -database mygenome -threads 8 -LTRStruct

# CURATE the de novo library against a protein DB before masking, or real multi-copy gene
# families (NLR/R-genes, zinc-fingers) get masked and "discovered" as a gene-poor repertoire.
# Then soft-mask with the curated library (RepeatMasker uses the bundled Dfam DB in addition).
RepeatMasker \
    -lib mygenome-families.fa \
    -pa 8 \
    -xsmall \
    -gff \
    -dir repeat_out \
    assembly.fasta

Repeat Masking QC Checkpoint

def check_repeat_content(repeatmasker_tbl, taxon='vertebrate'):
    '''
    Verify repeat content is within expected range for taxon.
    Typical ranges:
    - Vertebrate: 30-60%
    - Insect: 15-45%
    - Plant: 20-85%
    - Fungus: 3-20%
    '''
    expected_ranges = {
        'vertebrate': (30, 60), 'insect': (15, 45),
        'plant': (20, 85), 'fungus': (3, 20)
    }
    low, high = expected_ranges.get(taxon, (5, 80))

    with open(repeatmasker_tbl) as f:
        for line in f:
            if 'total interspersed' in line.lower():
                pct = float(line.strip().split()[-1].replace('%', ''))
                break

    qc_pass = low <= pct <= high
    if not qc_pass:
        print(f'WARNING: Repeat content {pct:.1f}% outside expected range ({low}-{high}%) for {taxon}')
    return qc_pass, pct

Step 2: Gene Prediction with BRAKER3

# BRAKER3 combines GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA
# Uses both RNA-seq and protein evidence for best results
braker.pl \
    --genome=repeat_out/assembly.fasta.masked \
    --bam=rnaseq_sorted.bam \
    --prot_seq=proteins.fa \
    --softmasking \
    --threads 8 \
    --species=my_species \
    --gff3 \
    --workingdir=braker_out

# If only RNA-seq evidence available
braker.pl \
    --genome=repeat_out/assembly.fasta.masked \
    --bam=rnaseq_sorted.bam \
    --softmasking \
    --threads 8 \
    --species=my_species \
    --gff3

# If only protein evidence available (use OrthoDB proteins)
braker.pl \
    --genome=repeat_out/assembly.fasta.masked \
    --prot_seq=orthodb_proteins.fa \
    --softmasking \
    --threads 8 \
    --species=my_species \
    --gff3

Gene Prediction QC Checkpoint

# BUSCO completeness on predicted proteins. Use the DEEPEST applicable clade dataset
# (e.g. insecta_odb10 / embryophyta_odb10), NOT the shallow eukaryota_odb10.
# The diagnostic that matters: compare this proteome BUSCO to a genome-mode BUSCO on the
# same assembly -- a large gap means the predictor missed present genes (see genome-annotation/annotation-qc).
busco \
    -i braker_out/braker.aa \
    -l <clade>_odb10 \
    -o busco_annotation \
    -m proteins \
    --cpu 8

def check_gene_prediction(braker_gff, busco_summary, expected_genes_range=(15000, 35000)):
    '''
    QC gates after gene prediction.
    - Gene count within expected range for genome
    - BUSCO completeness > 90%
    - Mean exons per gene > 1 (spliced genes expected in eukaryotes)
    '''
    gene_count = 0
    exon_count = 0
    with open(braker_gff) as f:
        for line in f:
            if line.startswith('#'):
                continue
            feature = line.strip().split('\t')[2] if len(line.strip().split('\t')) >= 3 else ''
            if feature == 'gene':
                gene_count += 1
            elif feature == 'exon':
                exon_count += 1

    mean_exons = exon_count / gene_count if gene_count > 0 else 0

    with open(busco_summary) as f:
        for line in f:
            if line.strip().startswith('C:'):
                completeness = float(line.strip().split('C:')[1].split('%')[0])
                break

    issues = []
    if not (expected_genes_range[0] <= gene_count <= expected_genes_range[1]):
        issues.append(f'Gene count {gene_count} outside expected range {expected_genes_range}')
    if completeness < 90:
        issues.append(f'BUSCO completeness {completeness:.1f}% < 90%')
    if mean_exons < 2:
        issues.append(f'Mean exons/gene {mean_exons:.1f} is low for eukaryote')

    print(f'Genes: {gene_count}, Mean exons/gene: {mean_exons:.1f}, BUSCO: {completeness:.1f}%')
    return len(issues) == 0, issues

Step 3: Functional Annotation

# eggNOG-mapper for comprehensive functional annotation
emapper.py \
    -i braker_out/braker.aa \
    --output eggnog_results \
    --cpu 8 \
    -m diamond \
    --tax_scope auto \
    --go_evidence non-electronic \
    --target_orthologs all \
    --seed_ortholog_evalue 1e-5 \
    --override

# InterProScan for domain annotation (complementary to eggNOG)
interproscan.sh \
    -i braker_out/braker.aa \
    -b interpro_results \
    -f tsv,gff3 \
    -goterms \
    -pa \
    -cpu 8

Functional Annotation QC Checkpoint

import pandas as pd

def check_functional_annotation(eggnog_annotations, total_genes):
    '''
    QC gate: > 60% of genes should have functional assignment.
    Below 50% suggests database issues or highly divergent organism.
    '''
    cols = ['query', 'seed_ortholog', 'evalue', 'score', 'eggNOG_OGs', 'max_annot_lvl',
            'COG_category', 'Description', 'Preferred_name', 'GOs', 'EC', 'KEGG_ko']
    df = pd.read_csv(eggnog_annotations, sep='\t', comment='#', header=None)
    df.columns = (cols + [f'c{i}' for i in range(len(df.columns) - len(cols))])[:len(df.columns)]
    annotated = len(df[df['Description'] != '-'])
    pct_annotated = annotated / total_genes * 100

    has_go = len(df[df['GOs'] != '-'])
    has_kegg = len(df[df['KEGG_ko'] != '-'])

    print(f'Annotated: {annotated}/{total_genes} ({pct_annotated:.1f}%)')
    print(f'With GO terms: {has_go}, With KEGG: {has_kegg}')

    if pct_annotated < 60:
        print('WARNING: <60% annotated. Check database version or use broader taxonomy scope.')
    return pct_annotated >= 60

Step 4: ncRNA Annotation

# tRNAscan-SE for tRNA genes
tRNAscan-SE \
    -E \
    --thread 8 \
    -o trna_results.txt \
    --gff trna.gff \
    assembly.fasta

# Infernal for Rfam-based ncRNA annotation. Rfam.cm ships pre-calibrated: cmpress it, never recalibrate.
# --cut_ga uses the curated per-family bit-score gathering thresholds (the correct Rfam default over a
# flat E-value); --rfam is the large-DB strict filter; --nohmmonly keeps GA valid for every model.
cmpress Rfam.cm
cmscan \
    --cpu 8 \
    --cut_ga --rfam --nohmmonly \
    --tblout rfam_results.tbl \
    --fmt 2 \
    --clanin Rfam.clanin \
    Rfam.cm \
    assembly.fasta
# Clan deoverlapping: drop hits marked '=' (dominated by a higher-scoring clanmate)
grep -v ' = ' rfam_results.tbl > rfam_results.deoverlapped.tbl

Merging Annotations

def merge_annotations(braker_gff, trna_gff, rfam_tbl, eggnog_tsv, output_gff):
    '''Merge gene predictions, ncRNAs, and functional annotations into final GFF3.'''
    import subprocess

    # Use AGAT for GFF merging and validation
    subprocess.run([
        'agat_sp_merge_annotations.pl',
        '--gff', braker_gff,
        '--gff', trna_gff,
        '-o', output_gff
    ], check=True)

    # Validate final GFF3
    subprocess.run([
        'agat_sp_statistics.pl',
        '--gff', output_gff,
        '-o', output_gff.replace('.gff3', '_stats.txt')
    ], check=True)

    print(f'Merged annotations written to {output_gff}')

Common Errors

Symptom	Cause	Fix
Chimeric gene set; training corrupted genome-wide	Annotated a contaminated assembly	CheckM2/FCS-GX gate BEFORE annotation; decontaminate first
Genes split at recoded stops; low coding density, high hypothetical	Wrong genetic-code table	Set the table from GTDB-Tk taxonomy, not a guess
Real NLR/immune gene families deleted; suspiciously gene-poor	Over-masking with an uncurated repeat library	Filter the RepeatModeler library against a protein DB; confirm conserved families survive; soft-mask -xsmall
Accessory genome inflated ~10x in a pangenome	Frozen-DB annotation drift (Panaroo)	Re-annotate all assemblies with ONE pipeline + DB version from FASTA; existing GenBank annotations are unusable for pangenomics
BUSCO looks great but models are wrong	BUSCO-only quality claim (certifies ~1000 easy genes)	Proteome-mode BUSCO on delivered proteins; add mono-exonic fraction + length distribution + mRNA:gene ratio
Low gene count	Repeat masking too aggressive	Soft-mask (-xsmall) not hard-mask; curate the TE library first
Isoform-naive annotation (mRNA:gene = 1.00)	No RNA-seq evidence	Add RNA-seq (Iso-Seq for isoforms/UTRs) to BRAKER3

Complete Pipeline Script

#!/bin/bash
set -e

GENOME="assembly.fasta"
RNASEQ_BAM="rnaseq_sorted.bam"
PROTEINS="orthodb_proteins.fa"
BAKTA_DB="/path/to/bakta_db"
THREADS=8

# Determine organism type
ORGANISM_TYPE="${1:-eukaryotic}"  # prokaryotic or eukaryotic

if [ "$ORGANISM_TYPE" == "prokaryotic" ]; then
    echo "Running prokaryotic annotation with Bakta"
    echo "Step 0: Contamination/completeness gate (CheckM2 before annotation is non-negotiable)"
    checkm2 predict --input $GENOME --output-directory checkm2_out --threads $THREADS
    # Inspect checkm2_out/quality_report.tsv: proceed only if Completeness is high and Contamination < 5%
    # --translation-table comes from the GTDB-Tk classification, never a guess (rule 1). Bakta silently
    # assumes table 11; Mycoplasma/Spiroplasma need 4 (UGA = Trp, not stop) or every gene is truncated.
    bakta --db $BAKTA_DB --output bakta_out --prefix genome --translation-table 11 \
          --locus-tag MYORG --threads $THREADS $GENOME
    echo "Done. Results in bakta_out/"

else
    echo "Running eukaryotic annotation pipeline"

    echo "Step 0: Assembly QC (contiguity + completeness before committing to annotation)"
    quast.py $GENOME -o quast_out --threads $THREADS
    busco -i $GENOME -l "${LINEAGE:?set the DEEPEST applicable clade dataset, e.g. insecta_odb10 / embryophyta_odb10; eukaryota_odb10 is too shallow and inflates completeness}" -o busco_asm -m genome --cpu $THREADS

    echo "Step 1: Repeat masking"
    BuildDatabase -name mygenome $GENOME
    RepeatModeler -database mygenome -threads $THREADS -LTRStruct
    RepeatMasker -lib mygenome-families.fa -pa $THREADS -xsmall -gff -dir repeat_out $GENOME

    echo "Step 2: Gene prediction with BRAKER3"
    braker.pl --genome=repeat_out/$(basename $GENOME).masked \
              --bam=$RNASEQ_BAM --prot_seq=$PROTEINS \
              --softmasking --threads $THREADS --gff3 --workingdir=braker_out

    echo "Step 3: BUSCO QC (use the deepest applicable clade dataset, not eukaryota_odb10)"
    busco -i braker_out/braker.aa -l "${LINEAGE:?set the DEEPEST applicable clade dataset, e.g. insecta_odb10 / embryophyta_odb10; eukaryota_odb10 is too shallow and inflates completeness}" -o busco_check -m proteins --cpu $THREADS

    echo "Step 4: Functional annotation"
    emapper.py -i braker_out/braker.aa --output eggnog_out --cpu $THREADS -m diamond

    echo "Step 5: ncRNA annotation"
    tRNAscan-SE -E --thread $THREADS -o trna_out.txt --gff trna.gff $GENOME
    cmscan --cpu $THREADS --cut_ga --rfam --nohmmonly --tblout rfam.tbl --fmt 2 --clanin Rfam.clanin Rfam.cm $GENOME

    echo "Done. Check braker_out/, eggnog_out*, trna.gff, rfam.tbl"
fi

Related Skills

• genome-annotation/prokaryotic-annotation - Bakta and Prokka details
• genome-annotation/eukaryotic-gene-prediction - BRAKER3 and AUGUSTUS options
• genome-annotation/repeat-annotation - Soft-masking before gene prediction
• genome-annotation/functional-annotation - eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan
• genome-annotation/ncrna-annotation - Infernal/Rfam and tRNAscan-SE detail
• rna-structure/ncrna-search - Covariance-model search, gathering thresholds, and clan resolution
• genome-annotation/annotation-qc - BUSCO genome-vs-proteome, OMArk, CheckM2 gates
• genome-assembly/assembly-qc - Pre-annotation assembly quality checks
• genome-intervals/gtf-gff-handling - GFF3/GTF hierarchy traversal, AGAT sanitizing/validation, coordinate conversion, and seqid-consistency checks on the merged annotation
• workflows/genome-assembly-pipeline - Upstream: hands off the decontaminated, QC-passed FASTA (with its QV/BUSCO)

References

• Salzberg SL (2019) Next-generation genome annotation: we still struggle to get it right. Genome Biology 20:92. DOI 10.1186/s13059-019-1715-2. (error propagation.)
• Gabriel L, Bruna T, Hoff KJ, et al (2024) BRAKER3: fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Research 34:769-777. DOI 10.1101/gr.278090.123. (high-confidence training-set mining.)
• Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, et al (2020) Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biology 21:180. DOI 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4. (annotation-drift accessory inflation.)
• Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, et al (2021) Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microbial Genomics 7:000685. DOI 10.1099/mgen.0.000685.