brainstorming
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
pr-writerCreate or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Write the PR body as a cover note for reviewers, not a changelog, template, validation log, or file-by-file summary.
Requires authenticated gh. Inspect the current branch, working tree, PR,
base branch, commits, and full diff:
git branch --show-current
git status --porcelain
gh pr view --json number,title,body,url,baseRefName,headRefName
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef
If gh pr view reports that no PR exists, continue with first-time PR
creation. For an existing PR, use its baseRefName; otherwise use the
repository default branch. Set BASE, then inspect:
git log "$BASE"..HEAD --oneline
git diff "$BASE"...HEAD
If on main or master, create a feature branch first. Ensure intended
changes are committed and review the whole branch diff, not only the latest
commit or existing PR text.
Use <type>(<scope>): <subject> or <type>: <subject>.
Allowed types: feat, fix, ref, perf, docs, test, build,
ci, chore, style, meta, license, and revert.
! only when the change breaks an external contract, and explain the
affected surface in the body.update, cleanup, misc, fix stuff,
or address feedback. Do not add a trailing period.Choose the minimum useful shape:
| Change | Include |
|---|---|
| Small or obvious | One concise paragraph without headings. |
| Feature, bug fix, or refactor | Changed behavior and effect; add root cause, unchanged behavior, or non-obvious approach when relevant. |
| Contract or breaking change | Affected API, schema, payload, config, permission, storage, or CLI surface; include compatibility and migration guidance. |
| Operational, visual, or workflow change | User/operator effect, measured impact, failure modes, or flow when useful. |
| Broad, generated, or cross-cutting change | Organizing principle, why the breadth is necessary, and where review should start. |
Default:
<What changed and what effect it has.>
<Why the approach, risk, migration, or review focus matters, if not obvious.>
For review-feedback updates, describe the resulting PR as a whole rather than the sequence of revisions.
Use an aid only when it reduces reviewer reconstruction work:
Introduce an artifact with one sentence explaining what reviewers should notice. Omit it when prose is clearer.
Summary, Changes, or Test Plan sections.Fixes <issue> closes;
Refs <issue> only links.Create new PRs as drafts. Write the body to a temporary Markdown file, then run:
gh pr create --draft --title '<title>' --body-file /tmp/pr-body.md
Update existing PRs with gh api:
gh api -X PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/PR_NUMBER \
-f title='<title>' \
-F body=@/tmp/pr-body.md
Refresh the title and body when follow-up commits materially change scope, approach, breaking behavior, risk, migration, or review expectations. Skip typo-only, formatting-only, and rename-only follow-ups.
Small change:
The AI Customizations section now starts collapsed so it does not consume
sidebar space before users need it. Expanding it preserves the existing saved
preference behavior.
Breaking contract:
Run logs now emit chunk-level records instead of one skill-level record.
Consumers that read top-level `findings` must iterate over
`chunk.findings` for each record.
Before:
```json
{"skill": "security-review", "findings": [...]}
```
After:
```json
{"schemaVersion": 1, "chunk": {"index": 1, "findings": [...]}}
```