executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
inverse-condemnation-complaintDrafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings.
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
name: inverse-condemnation-complaint language: en description: Drafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings. tags:
Draft a complaint seeking just compensation for property taken or damaged by government action without formal condemnation proceedings, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Collect before drafting:
| Forum | Basis | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Federal | 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or § 1343 (§ 1983) | Final decision per Williamson County v. Hamilton Bank [VERIFY]; address Tucker Act inapplicability for state/local defendants |
| State | State takings provision + inverse condemnation statute/common law | State-specific limitations period; venue where property is located |
Allege ripeness: (1) final government decision on regulation/permit; (2) state compensation procedures pursued or shown inadequate/unavailable.
Select applicable theory(ies):
| Type | Elements | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Physical (per se) | Permanent physical occupation; compensation required regardless of public interest/economic impact | Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) |
| Regulatory (Penn Central) | (1) Economic impact; (2) interference with investment-backed expectations; (3) character of government action | Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) |
| Total regulatory (Lucas) | Denies ALL economically beneficial use; not restricted by background nuisance/property law | Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) |
| Temporary | Deprived all use/value for specific period; compensation required even if regulation later withdrawn | First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) |
For each: allege constitutional provision violated, identify government purpose/public use, emphasize compensation arises from fact of taking.
| Component | Measure |
|---|---|
| Total taking | FMV as of date of taking |
| Partial taking | FMV before minus FMV after, plus severance damages |
| Temporary taking | Rental/use value for deprivation period |
| Consequential (if allowed) | Goodwill, relocation, loss of access, damage to remainder |
| Pre-judgment interest | From date of taking through judgment |
| Attorney fees | § 1988 (§ 1983 claims) or state fee-shifting statutes |
Include preliminary damage estimate; preserve right to prove exact amount at trial.
It looks like I don't have write permission to the file yet. Could you grant write access so I can save it, or would you like to copy the output above directly?