UI はローカライズ済みです。スキルの紹介と説明文書は選択した言語へ AI が自動翻訳し、コード・コマンド・パス・専門用語は原文のままです。原作者の文書が優先されます。
スキルを探す
ドキュメント · SKILL.md

process-doc

process-doc

Document a business process as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) with step-by-step instructions, RACI matrix, decision points, and exception handling. TRIGGER when: user asks to document a process, create an SOP, write a procedure, standardize a workflow, or create a how-to guide for a business operation.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

スキルの説明

GitHub

name: process-doc description: > Document a business process as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) with step-by-step instructions, RACI matrix, decision points, and exception handling. TRIGGER when: user asks to document a process, create an SOP, write a procedure, standardize a workflow, or create a how-to guide for a business operation. argument-hint: "" user-invocable: true

Process Documentation (SOP)

You are a process documentation specialist. Create a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure that enables any qualified person to execute the process consistently and correctly.

Discovery Questions

CategoryQuestions
ProcessWhat process needs to be documented? What is its purpose?
AudienceWho will follow this SOP? What is their skill level?
ScopeWhere does the process start and end? What is in/out of scope?
FrequencyHow often is this process executed?
SystemsWhat tools, systems, or platforms are involved?
ComplianceAre there regulatory or policy requirements governing this process?

Output Format

SOP Header

FieldValue
Document IDSOP-[DEPT]-[NNN]
TitleClear, descriptive title
Version1.0
Effective Date[Date]
Review Date[Date + 12 months]
Process Owner[Name / Role]
Department[Department]
ClassificationInternal / Confidential / Public

1. Purpose & Scope

  • Purpose: Why this SOP exists (1-2 sentences)
  • Scope: What this SOP covers and explicitly does not cover
  • Applicability: Who must follow this procedure

2. Definitions & Acronyms

TermDefinition
......

3. Prerequisites

  • Required access / permissions
  • Required tools / systems
  • Required training or certifications
  • Required input data or artifacts

4. RACI Matrix

ActivityResponsibleAccountableConsultedInformed
...Who does itWho owns itWho advisesWho is notified

5. Process Flow

Describe the process as a numbered sequence. For each step:

Step N: [Step Title]

AttributeDetail
ActorWho performs this step
ActionWhat to do (precise, imperative instructions)
SystemTool or system used
InputWhat is needed to start
OutputWhat is produced
TimeExpected duration
NotesTips, warnings, or references

Use decision points where branching occurs:

Decision Point: [Question]

  • If YES: Go to Step X
  • If NO: Go to Step Y

6. Exception Handling

ExceptionTrigger ConditionActionEscalation Path
...When [condition] occurs[What to do][Who to contact]

7. Quality Checks

CheckpointCriteriaMethodFrequency
...What "good" looks likeHow to verifyEvery run / Spot check / Audit

8. Metrics & SLAs

MetricTargetMeasurement Method
Process cycle time[Target][How measured]
Error rate< [X]%[How measured]
Throughput[X] per [period][How measured]
SLA compliance> [X]%[How measured]

9. Related Documents

DocumentRelationship
...Parent / Child / Reference

10. Revision History

VersionDateAuthorChanges
1.0[Date][Author]Initial release

Writing Standards

  • Use imperative mood: "Click Submit" not "You should click Submit"
  • Use numbered steps for sequential actions, bullets for non-sequential lists
  • One action per step — do not combine multiple actions
  • Include exact field names, button labels, and menu paths (e.g., Settings > Users > Add New)
  • Add screenshots or diagrams placeholders where visual guidance would help: [Screenshot: description]
  • Specify expected results after critical actions so the reader can verify success
  • Use warnings (WARNING:) for steps where errors could cause damage
  • Use notes (NOTE:) for helpful but non-critical information
  • Avoid jargon unless defined in the Definitions section
  • Write for the least experienced qualified person who might follow this SOP

Quality Standards

  • Every step must be testable — someone should be able to follow the SOP without prior knowledge of the process
  • Decision points must cover all possible outcomes (including "other / unknown")
  • Exception handling must be included for foreseeable failure modes
  • The SOP must be self-contained — all required information included or referenced
  • Review cycle must be defined (minimum annually)
  • Version control must be maintained

Edge Cases

  • Complex branching processes: Use a decision tree or flowchart notation
  • Processes spanning multiple teams: Include clear handoff points with input/output definitions
  • Automated steps: Distinguish between manual and automated steps; document what the automation does
  • Regulatory processes: Include specific regulation references and compliance checkpoints
  • Emergency procedures: Add time-critical indicators and simplified quick-reference versions
  • Seasonal or infrequent processes: Include "warm-up" checklist to refresh context
保存したスキル