---

name: standup description: > Generate a standup update from recent git commits, GitHub activity, and project context. Summarize what was done, what is in progress, and what is blocked. TRIGGER when: user says /standup, asks for a standup update, daily status, or wants to summarize recent work activity. argument-hint: "[optional: time range like 'since yesterday' or 'this week']" user-invocable: true

Standup Update Generator

You help engineers generate clear, concise standup updates from their recent activity. The update should be useful to teammates, not just a log dump.

Process

Step 1: Gather Activity Data

Collect information from available sources:

Git Activity:

• Run git log --oneline --since="yesterday" --author="$(git config user.name)" (adjust timeframe as needed)
• Run git log --oneline --since="yesterday" if author is unclear
• Check git branch for current working branch
• Check git diff --stat for uncommitted work in progress

GitHub Activity (if gh CLI available):

• Run gh pr list --author=@me --state=all --limit=10 for recent PRs
• Run gh pr list --search="reviewed-by:@me" for reviews done
• Run gh issue list --assignee=@me for assigned issues

Other Context:

• Ask the user about meetings, design work, or non-code activities
• Ask about blockers or dependencies

Step 2: Categorize Activity

Group work into:

Category	Description
Completed	Merged PRs, closed issues, finished tasks
In Progress	Open PRs, active branches, partially done work
Blocked	Waiting on review, external dependency, decision needed
Planned	What you intend to work on today

Step 3: Generate Update

Standard Format

**Yesterday / Since [date]:**
- [Completed] Merged PR #123: Add user authentication flow
- [Completed] Fixed bug in payment processing (issue #456)
- [In Progress] Working on search indexing optimization (PR #789 — 80% done)
- [Review] Reviewed PR #101: Database migration for user preferences

**Today:**
- Continue search indexing optimization
- Start API rate limiting implementation
- Team sync on Q2 roadmap at 2pm

**Blockers:**
- Waiting on DevOps for staging environment access (asked Monday)
- Need design review on notification preferences UI

Compact Format (for Slack/chat)

*Done:* Shipped auth flow (#123), fixed payment bug (#456)
*Doing:* Search indexing (PR #789, ~80%)
*Blocked:* Staging access from DevOps

Detailed Format (for async/weekly updates)

## Standup — [Name] — [Date]

### Completed
- **[PR #123] Add user authentication flow**
  - Implemented OAuth2 with Google and GitHub providers
  - Added session management with Redis-backed tokens
  - 95% test coverage on auth module

### In Progress
- **[PR #789] Search indexing optimization**
  - Reduced index build time from 45s to 12s
  - Still need to handle incremental updates
  - ETA: Tomorrow

### Blocked
- **Staging environment access**
  - Requested from DevOps on Monday, followed up Wednesday
  - Blocking end-to-end testing of auth flow
  - Escalation: Will ping DevOps manager if not resolved by EOD

### Notes
- Out of office Friday afternoon
- Sprint review moved to 3pm Thursday

Writing Standards

Good standup updates:

• Lead with impact, not activity ("Shipped feature X" not "Wrote code")
• Include PR/issue numbers for traceability
• Quantify progress when possible (80% done, 3 of 5 endpoints complete)
• Be specific about blockers — what is blocked, by whom, since when
• Keep it scannable — teammates should get the gist in 10 seconds

Avoid:

• Vague statements ("worked on stuff", "made progress")
• Exhaustive commit-by-commit logs
• Over-explaining technical details (link to the PR instead)
• Listing meetings as accomplishments (unless they produced decisions)

Time Ranges

User Says	Git Log Since
"standup" / "daily"	Yesterday / last working day
"weekly" / "this week"	Monday / last 7 days
"since [date]"	The specified date
"sprint update"	Sprint start date

If the user runs this on Monday, "yesterday" should cover Friday (and the weekend if there was weekend work).

Edge Cases

• If no git activity found, ask if the work was in a different repo or non-code work
• If the user has many repos, ask which one(s) to check
• If commit messages are cryptic, try to infer intent from branch names and PR titles
• For managers or leads, include team coordination activities (reviews, unblocking, planning)
• If the user works across multiple projects, group by project

Quality Checklist

• Output is specific and actionable, not generic
• All relevant inputs have been gathered before producing output
• Recommendations are prioritized by impact
• Stakeholders and audience are identified
• Output format matches the audience's needs
• Key assumptions are documented
• Follow-up actions have clear owners