UI はローカライズ済みです。スキルの紹介と説明文書は選択した言語へ AI が自動翻訳し、コード・コマンド・パス・専門用語は原文のままです。原作者の文書が優先されます。
スキルを探す
データ・研究 · SKILL.md

algo-seo-schema

algo-seo-schema

Implement Schema.org structured data markup in JSON-LD format for enhanced search results. Use this skill when the user needs to add rich snippets to web pages, implement FAQ/Product/Article schema, or validate structured data — even if they say 'rich snippets', 'structured data', or 'Google rich results'.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

スキルの説明

GitHub

name: "algo-seo-schema" description: "Implement Schema.org structured data markup in JSON-LD format for enhanced search results. Use this skill when the user needs to add rich snippets to web pages, implement FAQ/Product/Article schema, or validate structured data — even if they say 'rich snippets', 'structured data', or 'Google rich results'." metadata: category: "WP-35 SEO 演算法" tags: ["seo", "schema-org", "json-ld", "structured-data"]

Schema.org Structured Data

Overview

Schema.org structured data provides machine-readable page context to search engines via JSON-LD. Enables rich results (stars, FAQs, breadcrumbs, product cards) in SERPs. Implementation is O(1) per page — it's a markup task, not computational.

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • Adding rich snippet eligibility to web pages
  • Implementing product, article, FAQ, HowTo, or event markup
  • Debugging Google Search Console structured data errors

When NOT to use:

  • When optimizing page content or keywords (use content SEO)
  • When improving page speed (use Core Web Vitals optimization)

Algorithm

IRON LAW: Schema Markup Must MATCH Visible Content
Marking up content that users can't see violates Google guidelines
and risks manual penalties. Every structured data field must
correspond to content visible on the page.

Phase 1: Input Validation

Identify page type (Article, Product, FAQ, HowTo, Event, etc.). Map visible content to required and recommended schema properties. Gate: Page type identified, all required properties have visible content.

Phase 2: Core Algorithm

  1. Select the correct Schema.org type from the vocabulary
  2. Map page content to schema properties (name, description, image, etc.)
  3. Build JSON-LD object with @context and @type
  4. Handle nested types (e.g., Product contains Offer contains Price)
  5. Place JSON-LD in <script type="application/ld+json"> in <head>

Phase 3: Verification

Validate with Google Rich Results Test. Check: no errors, all required fields present, no mismatch with visible content. Gate: Passes Google Rich Results Test with zero errors.

Phase 4: Output

Return complete JSON-LD markup ready for insertion.

Output Format

{
  "schema": {"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Product", "name": "...", "offers": {"@type": "Offer", "price": "29.99", "priceCurrency": "TWD"}},
  "validation": {"errors": 0, "warnings": 1, "eligible_rich_results": ["Product snippet"]}
}

Examples

Sample I/O

Input: FAQ page with 3 questions and answers Expected: FAQPage schema with 3 Question/Answer pairs in JSON-LD

Edge Cases

InputExpectedWhy
Page with no clear typeUse WebPage as fallbackMost generic valid type
Multiple schemas neededArray of JSON-LD objectsOne page can have multiple types
Missing required fieldError, do not generateIncomplete schema hurts more than none

Gotchas

  • Required vs recommended: Google requires certain fields per type. Missing required fields = schema ignored entirely. Check documentation per type.
  • Nesting depth: Deeply nested schemas (Product > Offer > Seller > Address) are error-prone. Validate each nesting level.
  • Schema spam: Adding schema for content not on the page (fake reviews, unavailable prices) triggers manual actions.
  • Type specificity: Use the most specific type available. "Article" is better than "WebPage"; "NewsArticle" is better than "Article" for news content.
  • Testing gap: Google Rich Results Test shows what Google sees, but not all valid schema triggers rich results. Eligibility ≠ guarantee of display.

References

  • For complete property reference by type, see references/type-properties.md
  • For common validation errors and fixes, see references/validation-errors.md
保存したスキル