L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Documents · SKILL.md

research-l2

research-l2

Executes Phases 1-3 of the L2 process of the abap_wiki knowledge base on a slice: launches the abap-functional-researcher sub-agent (gap discovery + multi-source auto-research: wiki -> raw/docs -> MCP abap-fs on the <SAP_DEV_SYSTEM> system read-only -> standard knowledge), ingests gaps and evidence, and generates questionnaires for experts from the residual…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: research-l2 description: "Executes Phases 1-3 of the L2 process of the abap_wiki knowledge base on a slice: launches the abap-functional-researcher sub-agent (gap discovery + multi-source auto-research: wiki -> raw/docs -> MCP abap-fs on the <SAP_DEV_SYSTEM> system read-only -> standard knowledge), ingests gaps and evidence, and generates questionnaires for experts from the residual load-bearing gaps. Use this skill after slice-init to functionally document a process. Prerequisite: a slice with a real owner."

Research L2 - gap discovery, auto-research, questionnaires

Promotes knowledge from what the code does (L1) to why it exists and which process it serves (L2), per slice. The cycle is driven by you (main agent): you invoke the sub-agent abap-functional-researcher, the scripts handle the rest (persistence, views, questionnaires).

Architecture (see core/docs/03-l2-process.md):

  • researcher = sub-agent abap-functional-researcher: reads the L1 pages of the rich_target + the graph, discovers functional gaps, attempts to answer them autonomously (wiki -> raw/docs -> MCP abap-fs <SAP_DEV_SYSTEM> read-only -> standard [INFERRED]), writes citable evidence files and the research.yaml artifact.
  • submit-research persists gaps+evidence and closes auto-answered gaps as [VERIFIED].
  • questionnaire triages the residual load-bearing gaps by recipient, with the pre-filled hypothesis: the expert confirms/corrects instead of writing from scratch.

Prerequisite: slice-init already run (the slice has membership + real owner). The MCP abap-fs server running reduces the number of human questions; if it is off, auto-research proceeds on wiki+standards and nearly all gaps become questionnaire items (still useful).

Cycle

  1. Get the rich_target (the objects to document, with their L1 page paths):

    .venv/Scripts/python core/src/tools/pipeline.py slice-targets --slice <slice-id>
    

    Returns JSON [{slug, sap_type, sap_name, devclass, page_path, hop, role}, ...].

  2. Fan-out of the researcher (one per slice, or in batches if the rich_target is large - e.g. 8-10 objects per invocation). For each batch, one Task(subagent_type="abap-functional-researcher", ...) passing in the prompt:

    • slice_id, owner (from the manifest),
    • rich_target = the subset of objects in the batch (slug + page_path),
    • membership_path = slices/<slice-id>/membership.md,
    • research_artifact_path = output/l2/<slice-id>/<batch>/research.yaml. The agent writes the evidence files under slices/<slice-id>/research/ and the artifact.
  3. Ingest each artifact (gap numbering is progressive per slice, submits accumulate):

    .venv/Scripts/python core/src/tools/pipeline.py submit-research --slice <slice-id> --file output/l2/<slice-id>/<batch>/research.yaml
    
  4. Generate questionnaires for the residual load-bearing gaps (status open). Single owner answering everything -> one questionnaire:

    .venv/Scripts/python core/src/tools/pipeline.py questionnaire --slice <slice-id> --dest all
    

    Or triaged by role (one per recipient):

    pipeline.py questionnaire --slice <slice-id> --dest business
    pipeline.py questionnaire --slice <slice-id> --dest developer
    pipeline.py questionnaire --slice <slice-id> --dest customizing
    

    Files go to slices/<slice-id>/interviews/<date>-<slice>-<dest>.md with the pre-filled hypothesis and an Expert answer block to be filled in.

  5. Status + commit (manual, the user commits):

    .venv/Scripts/python core/src/tools/pipeline.py l2-progress --slice <slice-id>
    git add slices/<slice-id> state/ && git commit -m "research L2 <slice-id>"
    

When the owner has filled in the questionnaires, use the capture-answer skill to ingest them; the answers become canonical evidence and the gaps move to answered.

MCP usage (researcher, read-only)

  • execute_data_query on TBTCO/TBTCP (by program name) -> direct proof of TRIGGERS (job, frequency, variant);
  • get_abap_object_info -> long text of transactions/data elements/domains (FIELD-SEMANTICS);
  • find_where_used -> ACTOR/INTEGRATION;
  • COUNT(*)/SELECT DISTINCT on Z tables -> DATA-LIFECYCLE / field values. Each MCP result becomes a dated evidence file (source: mcp, system: <SAP_DEV_SYSTEM>).

Rules

  • The researcher is READ-ONLY: it does not modify SAP objects, does not write code, does not touch raw/.
  • Every hypothesis/answer carries a confidence tag; a load-bearing gap closes on its own only if [VERIFIED] (mcp/wiki/raw-docs). Others remain for the questionnaire.
  • gaps.yaml is a regenerated view: do not edit it manually. State lives in the DB.
  • No auto-commit in the skill: committing the slice is the user's responsibility.
Skills enregistrées