L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

benchmark-evaluation

benchmark-evaluation

Plan StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluations and two-environment policy-server flows without launching simulators.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: benchmark-evaluation description: "Plan StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluations and two-environment policy-server flows without launching simulators." disable-model-invocation: true metadata: disco-role: operating license: NOASSERTION

benchmark-evaluation

Use this sub-skill when a task asks how to plan, audit, or dry-run a StarVLA simulation benchmark evaluation. It covers LIBERO, SimplerEnv, RoboCasa, RoboTwin, DOMINO, BEHAVIOR, VLA-Arena, Calvin, RoboDojo, and closely related benchmark wrappers.

This skill is for safe planning. Do not start a policy server, download datasets/checkpoints, launch simulators, patch third-party repositories, or run benchmark-scale scripts unless the user explicitly asks for execution and the required environments are prepared.

Route first

  • Policy server internals, websocket/ZMQ protocol details, server response schemas, or client contract failures: policy-deployment.
  • Training command construction, YAML overrides, Accelerate/DeepSpeed, checkpoint production, or resume logic: training-config.
  • Dataset registry, LeRobot modality files, data mixtures, or statistics creation: data-integration.
  • Benchmark flow selection, two-terminal planning, simulator readiness, result/log/video expectations, and benchmark caveats: stay here.

Operating checklist

  1. Identify the benchmark family and whether the user wants planning only, a safe dry run, or actual evaluation.
  2. Confirm the policy-serving environment and simulator environment are separate unless the benchmark explicitly provides a safe local mock. Actual simulator evaluations normally require two terminals/process groups: one for StarVLA policy serving and one for the benchmark client.
  3. Collect placeholders before any execution: checkpoint path, host, port, device/GPU allocation, simulator project directory, benchmark data/assets, task/suite/mode, output directory, unnorm_key, and expected action chunk/replanning cadence.
  4. Use scripts/plan_benchmark_eval.py to print a safe plan for a named benchmark. This script only emits checklists; it never launches servers, downloads assets, or imports simulator packages.
  5. Consult references/evaluation-protocols.md for terminal roles and data contracts.
  6. Consult references/simulation-benchmarks.md for benchmark-specific readiness and caveats.
  7. Consult references/troubleshooting.md for common failure triage.

Key operating facts

  • Current StarVLA websocket clients should request server-side unnormalization by passing unnorm_key and should consume response["data"]["actions"], not hand-roll unnormalization from normalized_actions.
  • Clients should use server metadata for action_chunk_size instead of recomputing it from checkpoint config. Action chunk mismatch often looks like poor policy behavior rather than a hard error.
  • A checkpoint path has multiple roles: policy-server model loading, client-side run/result naming, and sometimes local access to metadata. It is not a substitute for benchmark data/assets.
  • Source benchmark launchers are reference-only by default because they may start long-running servers, simulators, downloads, GPU jobs, or third-party bootstrap steps.
  • If a protocol-level failure appears, stop benchmark triage and route to policy-deployment.
Skills enregistrées