L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

churn-risk-analysis

churn-risk-analysis

Analyze customer health signals, identify churn risk flags, and generate an intervention playbook. Use when user says "churn risk", "customer at risk", "red account", "at-risk customer", "health score dropped", "renewal at risk", "customer going dark", "cancel risk", or "what's wrong with this account" - even if they don't say "churn" explicitly. Applies to…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: churn-risk-analysis description: > Analyze customer health signals, identify churn risk flags, and generate an intervention playbook. Use when user says "churn risk", "customer at risk", "red account", "at-risk customer", "health score dropped", "renewal at risk", "customer going dark", "cancel risk", or "what's wrong with this account" - even if they don't say "churn" explicitly. Applies to CSMs triaging accounts or building proactive retention workflows.

Overview

Based on "Customer Success" by Mehta, Steinman & Murphy, churn rarely happens by surprise. The signals appear weeks or months before a customer cancels - they just go unread. This skill structures those signals into a scored risk model and prescribes specific interventions for each risk tier.

The core insight: churn is a lagging indicator. The leading indicators are low usage, missing stakeholders, unresolved complaints, and strategic misalignment. Act on those, not the cancellation notice.

Workflow

Step 1: Score the account across six risk dimensions

Rate each dimension 1 (healthy) to 3 (at risk):

Dimension1 - Healthy2 - Watch3 - At Risk
UsageMAU >80% of licenses, core feature adoption >70%MAU 50-80%, spotty feature useMAU <50%, logins declining MoM
Stakeholder coverageChampion active, exec sponsor engagedChampion disengaged, no exec relationshipChampion left, no internal advocate
Support load<3 tickets/month, all resolved4-8 tickets/month, 1-2 lingering>8 tickets/month or critical unresolved
NPS / sentimentNPS 8-10, positive qualitative signalsNPS 6-7, neutralNPS 0-5, complaints escalating
Goal progressOn track for agreed outcomesBehind on 1-2 goalsNo measurable progress, ROI questioned
Renewal proximity>6 months out3-6 months<3 months with unresolved issues

Composite score = sum of all dimensions (6-18)

  • 6-9: Healthy - standard cadence
  • 10-13: Watch - increase touchpoint frequency
  • 14-18: At Risk - immediate intervention required

Step 2: Identify which risk flags are present

Check for these specific churn signals from the CS literature:

  • Champion left: The person who bought and championed the product is no longer at [customer name]
  • Budget scrutiny: Customer mentions cost reviews, budget freezes, or consolidation initiatives
  • Silent period: No product login or CSM response for 3+ weeks without explanation
  • Executive disengagement: Exec sponsor declined last QBR or stopped attending
  • Competitive mention: Customer references a competitor by name in conversation
  • Support frustration: Repeated tickets on the same issue, escalating tone in communications
  • Failed expansion refusal: Customer declined an upsell or said "we need to right-size first"
  • Org change: Merger, acquisition, leadership change, or restructuring announced

Document which flags are active for [customer name].

Step 3: Assign risk tier and intervention playbook

Tier 1 - Healthy (score 6-9) Standard success motion:

  • Monthly check-in call
  • Quarterly health review
  • Proactive feature enablement aligned to goals

Tier 2 - Watch (score 10-13) Elevated engagement:

  • Bi-weekly calls until score improves
  • Build or refresh the Success Plan with new goals
  • Loop in 1-2 additional stakeholders to reduce champion dependency
  • Identify 1 quick win to re-establish momentum

Tier 3 - At Risk (score 14-18) Immediate intervention:

  1. CSM escalates to CS Manager within 24 hours
  2. Executive sponsor meeting booked within 2 weeks
  3. Remediation plan prepared with specific commitments and dates
  4. Internal coordination: loop in sales, support, and product if needed
  5. Weekly status cadence until score drops to Tier 2

Step 4: Map root cause to intervention type

Root CausePrimary Intervention
Low usageActivation sprint - identify unused high-value features, run targeted enablement
Champion leftStakeholder mapping - identify new champion, executive introduction via your sponsor
Unresolved support issueEscalation - assign DRI, set resolution SLA, provide daily updates
ROI not demonstratedValue audit - pull outcome data, schedule executive value review
Competitive threatCompetitive positioning call - address gaps directly, accelerate roadmap items
Budget pressureValue consolidation story - quantify ROI, provide cost justification data

Step 5: Write the intervention brief

For at-risk accounts, produce a one-page brief for internal stakeholders:

Account: [customer name] ARR: [value] Renewal date: [date] Risk score: [X/18] - Tier [1/2/3] Active flags: [list] Root cause hypothesis: [1-2 sentences] Proposed intervention: [specific actions, owners, dates] Success criteria: [what "recovered" looks like with a measurable signal]

Anti-Patterns

1. Waiting for the customer to say they're leaving Bad: Only flagging churn risk when a customer sends a cancellation email. Good: Scoring all accounts monthly. Catching at-risk signals 90+ days before renewal.

2. One-dimensional health scoring Bad: Defining "at risk" as only low usage. Good: Scoring across six dimensions. An account with high usage but no executive sponsor and a recent support escalation is still at risk.

3. Intervention without root cause Bad: "Account is red, scheduling an EBR." Good: "Champion left 6 weeks ago. We have no internal advocate. First step is stakeholder mapping to identify a new champion before any executive outreach."

4. No internal escalation path Bad: CSM handles Tier 3 accounts alone without manager involvement. Good: Tier 3 automatically triggers manager review and cross-functional coordination.

5. Treating all at-risk accounts the same Bad: Same playbook for low-usage accounts and accounts with executive disengagement. Good: Match intervention to root cause. Low usage needs activation. Lost champion needs relationship rebuilding. Support frustration needs escalation and resolution.

Quality Checklist

  • Account scored across all six risk dimensions (not just usage)
  • Composite score calculated and risk tier assigned
  • Active churn flags identified and documented
  • Root cause hypothesis stated (not just symptoms)
  • Intervention playbook matches the root cause, not just the tier
  • For Tier 3: manager notified, executive meeting booked, weekly cadence set
  • Intervention brief written for at-risk accounts with ARR and renewal date visible
  • Success criteria defined - what does "recovered" look like?
  • No personal names, internal tool names, or company-specific references in template
Skills enregistrées