L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

review-ux-ui

review-ux-ui

UX/UI review → Nielsen heuristics + WCAG 2.1 + keyboard/screen reader + flow + cognitive load + form. Use → pre-release usability, WCAG audit, flow eval, form review, heuristic eval.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: review-ux-ui locale: caveman-ultra source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > UX/UI review → Nielsen heuristics + WCAG 2.1 + keyboard/screen reader + flow + cognitive load + form. Use → pre-release usability, WCAG audit, flow eval, form review, heuristic eval. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob WebFetch metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: review complexity: advanced language: multi tags: ux, ui, accessibility, wcag, heuristics, usability, user-flows, cognitive-load

Review UX/UI

Eval UX/UI → usability|access|effectiveness.

Use When

  • Pre-release usability check
  • WCAG 2.1 AA|AAA audit
  • Flow eval → efficiency, err prevention
  • Form review → conversion
  • Heuristic eval existing UI
  • Cognitive load + info arch

In

  • Required: App (URL|prototype|src)
  • Required: Target user (role, skill, ctx)
  • Optional: User research (interview|survey|analytics)
  • Optional: WCAG target (A|AA|AAA)
  • Optional: Flows to eval
  • Optional: Assistive tech (screen reader|switch)

Do

Step 1: Heuristic Eval (Nielsen 10)

#HeuristicQRating
1Status visibilitySys informs user?
2Match real worldFamiliar lang/concepts?
3User control/freedomUndoredo
4ConsistencySimilar elements behave same?
5Err preventionPrevent before occur?
6Recognition > recallOptions visible?
7Flex/efficiencyShortcuts for experts?
8Aesthetic/minimalEvery element serves purpose?
9Err recoveryErrs clear, specific, constructive?
10Help/docsEasy find?

Severity:

SevDesc
0Not problem
1Cosmetic
2Minor
3Major
4Catastrophic — fix pre-release
## Heuristic Evaluation Findings
| # | Heuristic | Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|-----------|----------|---------|----------|
| 1 | System status | 3 | No loading indicator during data fetch — users click repeatedly | Dashboard page |
| 3 | User control | 2 | No undo for item deletion — only a confirmation dialog | Item list |
| 5 | Error prevention | 3 | Date field accepts invalid dates (Feb 30) | Booking form |
| 9 | Error recovery | 4 | Form submission error clears all fields | Registration |

→ All 10 evaluated w/ findings + severity.

If err: time-tight → focus 1, 3, 5, 9.

Step 2: Access Audit (WCAG 2.1)

Perceivable

  • 1.1.1 Non-text: Imgs have alt (decorative=alt="")
  • 1.3.1 Info/rels: Semantic HTML (headings, lists, tables, landmarks)
  • 1.3.2 Sequence: DOM order=visual order
  • 1.4.1 Color: Not sole means
  • 1.4.3 Contrast: ≥4.5:1 normal, ≥3:1 large
  • 1.4.4 Resize: 200% no loss
  • 1.4.11 Non-text contrast: UI ≥3:1
  • 1.4.12 Spacing: line 1.5x, letter 0.12em, word 0.16em

Operable

  • 2.1.1 Keyboard: All operable
  • 2.1.2 No trap: Focus never trapped
  • 2.4.1 Skip links: Avail
  • 2.4.3 Focus order: Logical
  • 2.4.7 Focus visible: Indicator clear
  • 2.4.11 Not obscured: Not behind sticky
  • 2.5.5 Target size: ≥24x24px (44x44 touch)

Understandable

  • 3.1.1 Lang: lang on <html>
  • 3.2.1 On focus: No surprise
  • 3.2.2 On input: No surprise w/o warn
  • 3.3.1 Err id: Clear text
  • 3.3.2 Labels: Visible
  • 3.3.3 Suggest: Fix hint

Robust

  • 4.1.1 Parsing: Valid HTML
  • 4.1.2 Name/role/val: Custom → ARIA
  • 4.1.3 Status msgs: Announced

→ WCAG 2.1 AA checked w/ pass/fail.

If err: auto-tools first (axe-core, Lighthouse) → manual for judgement.

Step 3: Keyboard + Screen Reader

Keyboard

Tab|Shift+Tab|Enter|Space|Arrow|Esc only:

## Keyboard Navigation Audit
| Task | Completable? | Issues |
|------|-------------|--------|
| Navigate to main content | Yes — skip link works | None |
| Open dropdown menu | Yes | Arrow keys don't work within menu |
| Submit a form | Yes | Tab order skips the submit button |
| Close a modal | No | Escape doesn't close, no visible close button in tab order |
| Use date picker | No | Custom date picker not keyboard accessible |

Screen Reader

NVDA|VoiceOver|TalkBack:

## Screen Reader Audit
| Element | Announced As | Expected | Issue |
|---------|-------------|----------|-------|
| Logo link | "link, image" | "Home, link" | Missing alt text on logo |
| Search input | "edit, search" | "Search products, edit" | Missing label association |
| Nav menu | "navigation, main" | Correct | None |
| Error message | (not announced) | "Error: email is required" | Missing live region |
| Loading spinner | (not announced) | "Loading, please wait" | Missing aria-live or role="status" |

→ Full flows tested keyboard + screen reader.

If err: no SR → inspect ARIA + semantic HTML as proxy.

Step 4: Flow Analysis

## User Flow: Complete a Purchase

### Steps
1. Browse products → 2. View product → 3. Add to cart → 4. View cart →
5. Enter shipping → 6. Enter payment → 7. Review order → 8. Confirm

### Assessment
| Step | Friction | Severity | Notes |
|------|---------|----------|-------|
| 1→2 | Low | - | Clear product cards |
| 2→3 | Medium | 2 | "Add to cart" button below the fold on mobile |
| 3→4 | Low | - | Cart icon updates with count |
| 4→5 | High | 3 | Must create account — no guest checkout |
| 5→6 | Low | - | Address autocomplete works well |
| 6→7 | Medium | 2 | Card number field doesn't auto-format |
| 7→8 | Low | - | Clear order summary |

### Flow Efficiency
- **Steps**: 8 (acceptable for e-commerce)
- **Required fields**: 14 (could reduce with address autocomplete + saved payment)
- **Decision points**: 2 (size selection, shipping method)
- **Potential drop-off points**: Step 4→5 (forced account creation)

→ Critical flows mapped, friction rated.

If err: no analytics → assess by step count + complexity.

Step 5: Cognitive Load

  • Density: Per-screen info appropriate?
  • Progressive disclosure: Complex revealed gradual?
  • Chunking: Related grouped (Gestalt)?
  • Recognition > recall: See vs remember?
  • Consistency: Similar tasks → similar patterns?
  • Decision fatigue: Too many choices? (Hick)
  • Working memory: Remember across steps?

→ Load assessed w/ overload|underload areas.

If err: hard objective → squint test (structure visible squinted?).

Step 6: Form Usability

  • Labels: Visible, associated
  • Placeholder: Examples only, not labels
  • Input types: Right (email|tel|number|date) for mobile
  • Validation timing: Blur|submit, not keystroke
  • Err msgs: Specific ("Email needs @") not generic
  • Required: Marked clear
  • Grouping: Related grouped
  • Autocomplete: autocomplete set
  • Tab order: Matches visual
  • Multi-step: Progress indicator
  • Persistence: Data preserved nav-away

→ Each form vs checklist + issues documented.

If err: many forms → prioritize high-traffic (registration|checkout|contact).

Step 7: Write Report

## UX/UI Review Report

### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: overall usability, most critical issues, strongest aspects]

### Heuristic Evaluation Summary
| Heuristic | Severity | Key Finding |
|-----------|----------|-------------|
[Summary table from Step 1]

### Accessibility Compliance
- **Target**: WCAG 2.1 AA
- **Status**: [X of Y criteria pass]
- **Critical failures**: [List]

### User Flow Analysis
[Key friction points with severity and recommendations]

### Top 5 Improvements (Prioritised)
1. **[Issue]** — Severity: [N] — [Specific recommendation]
2. ...

### What Works Well
1. [Specific positive observation]
2. ...

→ Prioritized, actionable recs w/ severity.

If err: too many issues → split "must fix" (3-4) vs "should fix" (1-2).

Check

  • All 10 Nielsen rated
  • WCAG checked (min: 1.1.1, 1.4.3, 2.1.1, 2.4.7, 3.3.1, 4.1.2)
  • Keyboard tested key flows
  • SR tested (or ARIA proxy)
  • ≥1 critical flow analyzed
  • Cognitive load assessed
  • Forms evaluated
  • Findings prioritized + actionable

Traps

  • UX vs visual: UX=how works, visual=how looks. Beautiful UI ≠ good UX.
  • Happy path only: Errs, empty, loading, edges = where bugs hide.
  • No real devices: DevTools = proxy. Real catches touch, perf, viewport.
  • Access afterthought: Late = expensive. Early + continuous.
  • Personal pref: "I prefer..." ≠ UX feedback. Cite heuristics|research|patterns.

→

  • review-web-design — visual review (layout, typo, color)
  • scaffold-nextjs-app — Next.js scaffold
  • setup-tailwind-typescript — Tailwind CSS
Skills enregistrées