L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

manage-backlog

manage-backlog

Create + maintain product/project backlog w/ prioritized items, acceptance criteria, estimates. User story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, grooming, item splitting, status tracking. Use starting new project + converting scope → actionable items, ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback / scope changes, splitting ov…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: manage-backlog locale: caveman-ultra source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-04-24" description: > Create + maintain product/project backlog w/ prioritized items, acceptance criteria, estimates. User story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, grooming, item splitting, status tracking. Use starting new project + converting scope → actionable items, ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback / scope changes, splitting oversized items. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: project-management complexity: intermediate language: multi tags: project-management, backlog, user-stories, prioritization, grooming, moscow

Manage a Product Backlog

Create, prioritize, maintain backlog of work items = single source of truth for what needs doing. Applicable agile + classic PM.

Use When

  • Start new project → convert scope → actionable items
  • Ongoing grooming before sprint planning
  • Re-prioritize after stakeholder feedback / scope changes
  • Split oversized items
  • Review + archive completed / cancelled

In

  • Req: Project scope (charter, WBS, stakeholder)
  • Opt: Existing BACKLOG.md to update
  • Opt: Framework pref (MoSCoW, value/effort, WSJF)
  • Opt: Estimation scale (pts, T-shirt, person-days)
  • Opt: Sprint/iteration feedback requiring updates

Do

Step 1: Create / Load Structure

No backlog → create BACKLOG.md w/ std cols. Exists → read + validate.

# Product Backlog: [Project Name]
## Last Updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]

### Summary
- **Total Items**: [N]
- **Ready for Sprint**: [N]
- **In Progress**: [N]
- **Done**: [N]
- **Cancelled**: [N]

### Backlog Items
| ID | Title | Type | Priority | Estimate | Status | Sprint |
|----|-------|------|----------|----------|--------|--------|
| B-001 | [Title] | Feature | Must | 5 | Ready | — |
| B-002 | [Title] | Bug | Should | 2 | Ready | — |
| B-003 | [Title] | Task | Could | 3 | New | — |

### Item Details

#### B-001: [Title]
- **Type**: Feature | Bug | Task | Spike | Tech Debt
- **Priority**: Must | Should | Could | Won't
- **Estimate**: [Points or size]
- **Status**: New | Ready | In Progress | Done | Cancelled
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
  - [ ] [Criterion 1]
  - [ ] [Criterion 2]
- **Notes**: [Context, links, dependencies]

#### B-002: [Title]
...

→ BACKLOG.md w/ valid structure + summary stats.

If err: Malformed → restructure preserving existing item data.

Step 2: Write / Refine Items

Each new item as user story / requirement:

  • User story: "As a [role], I want [capability] so that [benefit]"
  • Requirement: "[System/Component] shall [behavior] when [condition]"

Each item needs:

  • Unique ID (B-NNN, incrementing)
  • Clear title (imperative verb form)
  • Type classification
  • ≥2 acceptance criteria (testable, binary pass/fail)

Example:

#### B-005: Enable User Login with OAuth
- **Type**: Feature
- **Priority**: Must
- **Estimate**: 5
- **Status**: Ready
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
  - [ ] User can log in using GitHub OAuth
  - [ ] User session persists for 24 hours
  - [ ] Failed login shows clear error message
- **Notes**: Requires OAuth app registration in GitHub

→ All items have titles, types, acceptance criteria.

If err: No acceptance criteria → Status: New (not Ready). Can't enter sprint.

Step 3: Prioritize (MoSCoW / Value-Effort)

MoSCoW (default):

  • Must: Project fails without. Non-negotiable.
  • Should: Important but project succeeds without. Include if capacity.
  • Could: Nice to have. Only if no impact on Must/Should.
  • Won't: Explicitly excluded. Documented for future.

Value/Effort Matrix (alt):

Low EffortHigh Effort
High ValueDo First (Quick Wins)Do Second (Big Bets)
Low ValueDo Third (Fill-ins)Don't Do (Money Pits)

Sort table: Must first (by value within Must), Should, Could.

→ Every item has priority. Backlog sorted by priority.

If err: Stakeholders disagree on priorities → escalate Must vs Should to sponsor.

Step 4: Groom — Split, Estimate, Refine

Review for sprint-readiness. Per item:

  1. Split if estimate > 8 pts (or > 1 week) → 2-4 smaller
  2. Estimate using chosen scale
  3. Refine vague criteria → testable conditions
  4. Mark Ready when has title, criteria, estimate, no blockers

Document splitting:

**Split**: B-003 split into B-003a, B-003b, B-003c (original archived)

#### B-003a: Set Up Database Schema
- **Type**: Task
- **Priority**: Must
- **Estimate**: 3
- **Status**: Ready
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
  - [ ] Users table created with email, name fields
  - [ ] Migrations run successfully on dev environment

#### B-003b: Implement User CRUD Operations
- **Type**: Task
- **Priority**: Must
- **Estimate**: 5
- **Status**: Ready
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
  - [ ] Create user endpoint returns 201 with user object
  - [ ] Update user endpoint validates required fields

→ All Must + Should → Ready.

If err: Can't estimate → need Spike (time-boxed research task) in backlog.

Step 5: Update Summary + Archive

Update summary stats. Move Done + Cancelled → archive:

### Archive
| ID | Title | Status | Sprint | Completed |
|----|-------|--------|--------|-----------|
| B-001 | Enable User Login with OAuth | Done | S-003 | 2025-03-15 |
| B-004 | Add Dark Mode Theme | Cancelled | — | 2025-03-10 |

Update summary by counting per status:

# Count Ready items
grep "| Ready |" BACKLOG.md | wc -l

# Count In Progress items
grep "| In Progress |" BACKLOG.md | wc -l

# Count Done items
grep "| Done |" BACKLOG.md | wc -l

→ Stats match actual counts. Archive has all closed items.

If err: Counts don't match → recount by grepping Status + update summary manually.

Check

  • BACKLOG.md w/ std structure
  • Every item has unique ID, title, type, priority, status
  • All Must + Should have criteria
  • Items sorted by priority (Must, Should, Could)
  • No item > 8 pts w/o split
  • Summary stats accurate
  • Done/Cancelled archived

Traps

  • No acceptance criteria: Items w/o criteria can't verify done. Every item ≥2 testable criteria.
  • Everything Must: >50% Must → priorities not real. Force-rank within Must.
  • Zombie items: Sitting months w/o progress → re-evaluate / cancel.
  • Estimates w/o ctx: Story pts relative → team needs ref item (e.g., "B-001 = our 3-pt reference").
  • Splitting creates fragments: Split → each child indep deliverable + valuable.
  • Backlog as dumping ground: Not wish list. Prune items no longer aligned.
  • Missing deps: Note blocking in Notes. Blocked item ≠ Ready.

→

  • draft-project-charter — charter scope → initial backlog creation
  • create-work-breakdown-structure — WBS work pkgs → backlog items
  • plan-sprint — sprint planning selects from top of backlog
  • generate-status-report — backlog burn-down → status reports
  • conduct-retrospective — retro improvement items → backlog
Skills enregistrées