L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Documents · SKILL.md

setup-gxp-r-project

setup-gxp-r-project

Set up an R project structure compliant with GxP regulations (21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11). Covers validated environments, qualification documentation, change control, and electronic records requirements. Use when starting an R analysis project in a regulated environment (pharma, biotech, medical devices), setting up R for clinical trial analysis, creating …

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: setup-gxp-r-project locale: caveman-lite source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > Set up an R project structure compliant with GxP regulations (21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11). Covers validated environments, qualification documentation, change control, and electronic records requirements. Use when starting an R analysis project in a regulated environment (pharma, biotech, medical devices), setting up R for clinical trial analysis, creating a validated computing environment for regulatory submissions, or implementing 21 CFR Part 11 or EU Annex 11 requirements. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: compliance complexity: advanced language: R tags: gxp, validation, regulatory, pharma, 21-cfr-part-11

Set Up GxP R Project

Create an R project structure that meets GxP regulatory requirements for validated computing.

When to Use

  • Starting an R analysis project in a regulated environment (pharma, biotech, medical devices)
  • Setting up R for clinical trial analysis
  • Creating a validated computing environment for regulatory submissions
  • Implementing 21 CFR Part 11 or EU Annex 11 requirements

Inputs

  • Required: Project scope and regulatory framework (FDA, EMA, or both)
  • Required: R version and package versions to validate
  • Required: Validation strategy (risk-based approach)
  • Optional: Existing SOPs for computerized systems
  • Optional: Quality management system integration requirements

Procedure

Step 1: Create Validated Project Structure

gxp-project/
├── R/                          # Analysis scripts
│   ├── 01_data_import.R
│   ├── 02_data_processing.R
│   └── 03_analysis.R
├── validation/                 # Validation documentation
│   ├── validation_plan.md      # VP: scope, strategy, roles
│   ├── risk_assessment.md      # Risk categorization
│   ├── iq/                     # Installation Qualification
│   │   ├── iq_protocol.md
│   │   └── iq_report.md
│   ├── oq/                     # Operational Qualification
│   │   ├── oq_protocol.md
│   │   └── oq_report.md
│   ├── pq/                     # Performance Qualification
│   │   ├── pq_protocol.md
│   │   └── pq_report.md
│   └── traceability_matrix.md  # Requirements to tests mapping
├── tests/                      # Automated test suite
│   ├── testthat.R
│   └── testthat/
│       ├── test-data_import.R
│       └── test-analysis.R
├── data/                       # Input data (controlled)
│   ├── raw/                    # Immutable raw data
│   └── derived/                # Processed datasets
├── output/                     # Analysis outputs
├── docs/                       # Supporting documentation
│   ├── sop_references.md       # Links to relevant SOPs
│   └── change_log.md           # Manual change documentation
├── renv.lock                   # Locked dependencies
├── DESCRIPTION                 # Project metadata
├── .Rprofile                   # Session configuration
└── CLAUDE.md                   # AI assistant instructions

Got: The complete directory structure exists with R/, validation/ (including iq/, oq/, pq/ subdirectories), tests/testthat/, data/raw/, data/derived/, output/, and docs/ directories.

If fail: With missing directories, create them with mkdir -p. Verify you are in the correct project root. For existing projects, create only the missing directories rather than overwriting existing structure.

Step 2: Create Validation Plan

Create validation/validation_plan.md:

# Validation Plan

## 1. Purpose
This plan defines the validation strategy for [Project Name] using R [version].

## 2. Scope
- R version: 4.5.0
- Packages: [list with versions]
- Analysis: [description]
- Regulatory framework: 21 CFR Part 11 / EU Annex 11

## 3. Risk Assessment Approach
Using GAMP 5 risk-based categories:
- Category 3: Non-configured products (R base)
- Category 4: Configured products (R packages with default settings)
- Category 5: Custom applications (custom R scripts)

## 4. Validation Activities
| Activity | Category 3 | Category 4 | Category 5 |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| IQ | Required | Required | Required |
| OQ | Reduced | Standard | Enhanced |
| PQ | N/A | Standard | Enhanced |

## 5. Roles and Responsibilities
- Validation Lead: [Name]
- Developer: [Name]
- QA Reviewer: [Name]
- Approver: [Name]

## 6. Acceptance Criteria
All tests must pass with documented evidence.

Got: validation/validation_plan.md is complete with scope, GAMP 5 risk categories, validation activities matrix, roles and responsibilities, and acceptance criteria. The plan references the specific R version and regulatory framework.

If fail: With unclear regulatory framework, consult the organization's QA department for applicable SOPs. Do not proceed with validation activities until the plan is reviewed and approved.

Step 3: Lock Dependencies with renv

# Initialize renv with exact versions
renv::init()

# Install specific validated versions
renv::install("dplyr@1.1.4")
renv::install("ggplot2@3.5.0")

# Snapshot
renv::snapshot()

The renv.lock file serves as the controlled package inventory.

Got: renv.lock exists with exact version numbers for all required packages. renv::status() reports no issues. Every package version is pinned (e.g., dplyr@1.1.4), not floating.

If fail: If renv::install() fails for a specific version, check that the version exists on CRAN archives. Use renv::install("package@version", repos = "https://packagemanager.posit.co/cran/latest") for archived versions.

Step 4: Implement Version Control

git init
git add .
git commit -m "Initial validated project structure"

# Use signed commits for traceability
git config user.signingkey YOUR_GPG_KEY
git config commit.gpgsign true

Got: The project is under git version control with signed commits enabled. The initial commit contains the validated project structure and renv.lock.

If fail: With GPG signing failing, verify the GPG key is configured with gpg --list-secret-keys. For environments without GPG, document the deviation and use unsigned commits with manual audit trail entries in docs/change_log.md.

Step 5: Create IQ Protocol

validation/iq/iq_protocol.md:

# Installation Qualification Protocol

## Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed.

## Test Cases

### IQ-001: R Version Verification
- **Requirement**: R 4.5.0 installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `R.version.string`
- **Expected:** "R version 4.5.0 (date)"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]

### IQ-002: Package Installation Verification
- **Requirement**: All packages in renv.lock installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `renv::status()`
- **Expected:** "No issues found"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]

### IQ-003: Package Version Verification
- **Procedure**: Execute `installed.packages()[, c("Package", "Version")]`
- **Expected:** Versions match renv.lock exactly
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]

Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md contains test cases for R version verification, package installation verification, and package version verification, each with clear expected results and pass/fail fields.

If fail: If the IQ protocol template does not match organizational SOP requirements, adapt the format while retaining the required fields (requirement, procedure, expected result, actual result, pass/fail). Consult QA for approved templates.

Step 6: Write Automated OQ/PQ Tests

# tests/testthat/test-analysis.R
test_that("primary analysis produces validated results", {
  # Known input -> known output (double programming validation)
  test_data <- read.csv(test_path("fixtures", "validation_dataset.csv"))

  result <- primary_analysis(test_data)

  # Compare against independently calculated expected values
  expect_equal(result$estimate, 2.345, tolerance = 1e-3)
  expect_equal(result$p_value, 0.012, tolerance = 1e-3)
  expect_equal(result$ci_lower, 1.234, tolerance = 1e-3)
})

Got: Automated test files exist in tests/testthat/ covering OQ (operational verification of each function) and PQ (end-to-end validation against independently calculated reference values). Tests use explicit numeric tolerances.

If fail: With reference values not yet available from independent calculation (e.g., SAS), create placeholder tests with skip("Awaiting independent reference values") and document in the traceability matrix.

Step 7: Create Traceability Matrix

# Traceability Matrix

| Req ID | Requirement | Test ID | Test Description | Status |
|--------|-------------|---------|------------------|--------|
| REQ-001 | Import CSV data correctly | OQ-001 | Verify data dimensions and types | PASS |
| REQ-002 | Calculate primary endpoint | PQ-001 | Compare against reference results | PASS |
| REQ-003 | Generate report output | PQ-002 | Verify report contains all sections | PASS |

Got: validation/traceability_matrix.md links every requirement to at least one test case, and every test case is linked to a requirement. No orphaned requirements or tests.

If fail: With untested requirements, create test cases for them or document a risk-based justification for exclusion. With tests lacking a linked requirement, either link them to an existing requirement or remove them as out-of-scope.

Validation

  • Project structure follows documented template
  • renv.lock contains all dependencies with exact versions
  • Validation plan is complete and approved
  • IQ protocol executes successfully
  • OQ test cases cover all configured functionality
  • PQ tests validate against independently computed results
  • Traceability matrix links requirements to tests
  • Change control process is documented

Pitfalls

  • Using install.packages() without version pinning: Always use renv with locked versions
  • Missing audit trail: Every change must be documented. Use git signed commits.
  • Over-validating: Apply risk-based approach. Not every CRAN package needs Category 5 validation.
  • Forgetting system-level qualification: The OS and R installation need IQ too
  • No independent verification: PQ should compare against results computed independently (SAS, manual calculation)

Related Skills

  • write-validation-documentation - detailed validation document creation
  • implement-audit-trail - electronic records and audit trails
  • validate-statistical-output - double programming and output validation
  • manage-renv-dependencies - dependency locking for validated environments
Skills enregistrées