L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

notion-automation

notion-automation

Implements intelligent notion automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: notion-automation compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent notion automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: notion-automation, notion automation, how do i notion-automation, orchestrate notion-automation, automate notion-automation, agent notion-automation archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

Notion Automation

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for notion automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def resolve_notion_action(
    user_intent: str,
    available_notion_ops: List[Dict],
    min_confidence: float = 0.75
) -> Optional[Dict]:
    """Map user intent to a specific Notion API operation.
    
    Evaluates triggers against Notion's resource types (pages, databases, blocks)
    and applies multi-factor scoring based on historical success and API health.
    """
    if not user_intent or not user_intent.strip():
        raise ValueError("User intent cannot be empty")
        
    if not available_notion_ops:
        raise ValueError("No Notion operations registered")
        
    # Parse intent into Notion-specific features (resource type, action verb, target ID)
    intent_features = _parse_notion_intent(user_intent)
    
    best_op = None
    best_score = 0.0
    
    for op in available_notion_ops:
        # Score based on resource match, verb alignment, and API availability
        score = _calculate_notion_match_score(intent_features, op)
        
        if score > best_score and score >= min_confidence:
            best_score = score
            best_op = op
            
    if best_op is None:
        return None
        
    # Return immutable operation config (Law 3: Atomic Predictability)
    return {
        "operation": best_op["name"],
        "resource_type": best_op["resource"],
        "confidence": best_score,
        "params": best_op.get("default_params", {}),
        "timestamp": time.time()
    }

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_notion_operation_with_retry(
    operation: Dict,
    notion_client: Any,
    max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
    """Execute a Notion API operation with resilience patterns.
    
    Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud for invalid Notion states:
    - Missing page/database IDs halt immediately
    - Rate limits trigger exponential backoff
    - Fallback chain handles transient API failures
    """
    if not operation or "operation" not in operation:
        raise ValueError("Invalid operation configuration")
        
    resource_type = operation.get("resource_type")
    params = operation.get("params", {})
    
    for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
        try:
            # Route to specific Notion API endpoint based on operation type
            if resource_type == "page":
                result = notion_client.pages.create(**params)
            elif resource_type == "database":
                result = notion_client.databases.query(**params)
            elif resource_type == "block":
                result = notion_client.blocks.children.append(**params)
            else:
                raise ValueError(f"Unsupported Notion resource: {resource_type}")
                
            return {
                "success": True,
                "operation": operation["operation"],
                "result": result,
                "attempts": attempt + 1,
                "latency_ms": _measure_latency()
            }
            
        except RateLimitError as e:
            if attempt == max_retries:
                return _apply_notion_fallback(operation, e)
            time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff for 429s
            
        except InvalidStateError as e:
            # Fail Fast - Notion IDs or schemas are invalid (Law 4)
            raise ValueError(f"Notion state invalid: {str(e)}") from e
            
    raise ValueError(f"Notion operation failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts")

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |



Constraints

MUST DO

  • Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions
  • Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions
  • Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability
  • Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again
  • Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates
  • Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation
  • Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

Skills enregistrées