L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

hierarchical-agent-memory

hierarchical-agent-memory

Implements intelligent hierarchical agent memory with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: hierarchical-agent-memory compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent hierarchical agent memory with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: hierarchical-agent-memory, hierarchical agent memory, how do i hierarchical-agent-memory, orchestrate hierarchical-agent-memory, automate hierarchical-agent-memory, agent hierarchical-agent-memory archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

Hierarchical Agent Memory

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for hierarchical agent memory workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def select_memory_layer(
    query: str,
    agent_state: Dict[str, Any],
    memory_store: MemoryBackend,
    min_relevance: float = 0.65
) -> Optional[MemoryChunk]:
    """Select the optimal memory layer for a given query based on hierarchical scoring.
    
    Evaluates short-term buffer, long-term vector store, and episodic cache using:
    - Semantic similarity to query
    - Temporal decay factor (recency weighting)
    - Agent confidence in stored context
    - Cross-layer consistency checks
    
    Args:
        query: User or agent query string
        agent_state: Current agent context including confidence scores and active tasks
        memory_store: Backend interface for hierarchical memory access
        min_relevance: Minimum relevance threshold for selection
        
    Returns:
        Selected MemoryChunk with metadata, or None if below threshold
    """
    # Law 1: Early exit on invalid state
    if not query or not isinstance(query, str):
        raise ValueError("Query must be a non-empty string")
    if not memory_store.is_healthy():
        raise MemoryUnavailableError("Memory backend is currently unavailable")
        
    # Law 2: Parse & validate inputs immutably
    parsed_query = _normalize_query(query)
    temporal_weight = _calculate_recency_decay(agent_state.get("session_start"))
    
    candidates = []
    for layer in ["short_term", "long_term", "episodic"]:
        if not memory_store.has_layer(layer):
            continue
            
        raw_results = memory_store.search(layer, parsed_query, top_k=3)
        for chunk in raw_results:
            relevance = _compute_multi_factor_score(
                semantic=_embed_similarity(parsed_query, chunk.text),
                temporal=temporal_weight * chunk.timestamp_weight,
                confidence=agent_state.get("memory_confidence", 0.8)
            )
            if relevance >= min_relevance:
                candidates.append({
                    "chunk": chunk,
                    "layer": layer,
                    "score": relevance,
                    "source_trace": f"{layer}:{chunk.id}"
                })
                
    if not candidates:
        return None
        
    # Law 3: Return new structure, never mutate agent_state
    best = max(candidates, key=lambda x: x["score"])
    return {
        "selected_layer": best["layer"],
        "memory_chunk": best["chunk"],
        "relevance_score": best["score"],
        "selection_context": {
            "query_hash": hashlib.md5(parsed_query.encode()).hexdigest(),
            "timestamp": time.time(),
            "fallback_eligible": len(candidates) > 1
        }
    }

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_memory_retrieval(
    selected_memory: Dict[str, Any],
    agent_context: Dict[str, Any],
    fallback_strategy: str = "cascade"
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    """Execute memory retrieval with a structured fallback chain for hierarchical systems.
    
    Implements resilient memory access:
    1. Direct layer retrieval (primary)
    2. Cross-layer semantic expansion (secondary)
    3. Default context window fallback (tertiary)
    4. Explicit error state with audit logging (final)
    
    Args:
        selected_memory: Output from select_memory_layer
        agent_context: Full agent state including task history and constraints
        fallback_strategy: Routing strategy for degraded states
        
    Returns:
        Enriched context dictionary with retrieved memory and execution metadata
    """
    # Law 1: Guard clause for required fields
    required_keys = {"selected_layer", "memory_chunk", "relevance_score"}
    if not required_keys.issubset(selected_memory.keys()):
        raise MemoryRetrievalError("Incomplete memory selection metadata")
        
    layer = selected_memory["selected_layer"]
    chunk = selected_memory["memory_chunk"]
    
    # Law 4: Fail fast on corrupted or inaccessible memory
    if not _validate_memory_integrity(chunk):
        raise CorruptedMemoryError(f"Memory chunk {chunk.id} failed integrity check")
        
    try:
        # Primary execution: Fetch full context from selected layer
        enriched_context = _merge_memory_into_context(chunk, agent_context)
        
        # Law 3: Return immutable result
        return {
            "status": "success",
            "layer_used": layer,
            "context": enriched_context,
            "metadata": {
                "latency_ms": time.time() * 1000,
                "confidence_boost": selected_memory["relevance_score"] * 0.15,
                "audit_id": uuid4().hex
            }
        }
        
    except MemoryTimeoutError:
        # Fallback 1: Cascade to alternative layer
        if fallback_strategy == "cascade":
            alt_layer = _select_alternative_layer(layer)
            alt_chunk = _fetch_from_layer(alt_layer, chunk.query_hash)
            if alt_chunk:
                return execute_memory_retrieval({
                    "selected_layer": alt_layer,
                    "memory_chunk": alt_chunk,
                    "relevance_score": 0.5
                }, agent_context, "cascade")
                
    except MemoryAccessDeniedError:
        # Fallback 2: Use default context window
        return {
            "status": "fallback",
            "layer_used": "default_context",
            "context": _load_default_context(agent_context),
            "metadata": {
                "latency_ms": time.time() * 1000,
                "confidence_boost": 0.0,
                "audit_id": uuid4().hex,
                "reason": "access_denied"
            }
        }
        
    # Law 4: Fail loud with full context
    raise MemoryRetrievalError(
        f"Failed to retrieve memory for layer {layer} after fallback attempts"
    )

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios

Related Skills

SkillPurpose
agent-memory-systemsBroader memory architectures including vector stores and retrieval strategies
agent-context-memoryShort-term context window management layered on top of hierarchical memory


Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
  • Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
  • Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
  • Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
  • Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
  • Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
  • Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

Skills enregistrées