L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

cc-skill-clickhouse-io

cc-skill-clickhouse-io

Implements intelligent cc skill clickhouse io with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: cc-skill-clickhouse-io compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent cc skill clickhouse io with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: cc-skill-clickhouse-io, cc skill clickhouse io, how do i cc-skill-clickhouse-io, orchestrate cc-skill-clickhouse-io, automate cc-skill-clickhouse-io, agent cc-skill-clickhouse-io archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

Cc Skill Clickhouse Io

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for cc skill clickhouse io workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def route_clickhouse_query(
    query: str,
    schema_registry: Dict[str, TableSchema],
    cluster_topology: List[Dict],
    min_query_score: float = 0.8
) -> Dict:
    """Route and validate ClickHouse queries against schema and cluster topology.
    
    Applies Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable) by validating
    table existence, column types, and cluster health before execution.
    
    Args:
        query: Raw SQL query string
        schema_registry: Mapping of table_name -> TableSchema
        cluster_topology: List of available ClickHouse nodes with health/status
        min_query_score: Minimum routing confidence threshold
        
    Returns:
        Routing decision dict with target_node, execution_mode, and validation_status
    """
    # Law 1: Early exit on invalid input
    if not query or not query.strip().upper().startswith(("SELECT", "INSERT", "SYSTEM")):
        raise ValueError("Unsupported query type for ClickHouse IO pipeline")
        
    # Law 2: Parse and validate schema constraints
    parsed_tables = _extract_target_tables(query)
    for table in parsed_tables:
        if table not in schema_registry:
            raise ValueError(f"Table '{table}' not found in schema registry")
        _validate_query_against_schema(query, schema_registry[table])
        
    # Law 3: Atomic routing decision (no mutation of topology)
    healthy_nodes = [
        node for node in cluster_topology 
        if node["status"] == "online" and node["load_factor"] < 0.85
    ]
    
    if not healthy_nodes:
        return {"status": "degraded", "fallback": "read_replica_pool"}
        
    # Score nodes based on query type and load
    target_node = max(healthy_nodes, key=lambda n: _calculate_node_score(n, query))
    
    return {
        "target_node": target_node["address"],
        "execution_mode": "async_insert" if "INSERT" in query.upper() else "sync",
        "validation_passed": True,
        "routing_confidence": 0.95
    }

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_clickhouse_pipeline(
    routing_decision: Dict,
    query: str,
    clickhouse_client: ClickHouseClient,
    fallback_replicas: List[str] = None
) -> Dict:
    """Execute ClickHouse query with domain-specific fallback and error handling.
    
    Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) by catching ClickHouse-specific
    exception codes and routing to fallback replicas or retry queues.
    
    Args:
        routing_decision: Output from route_clickhouse_query
        query: Validated SQL query
        clickhouse_client: Initialized ClickHouse client instance
        fallback_replicas: List of replica addresses for failover
        
    Returns:
        Execution result with row counts, latency, and status metadata
    """
    target = routing_decision["target_node"]
    mode = routing_decision["execution_mode"]
    attempts = 0
    max_attempts = 3
    
    while attempts < max_attempts:
        try:
            # Law 3: Return new result structure, never mutate client state
            if mode == "async_insert":
                result = clickhouse_client.execute_async(query, target)
            else:
                result = clickhouse_client.execute_sync(query, target)
                
            return {
                "success": True,
                "rows_affected": result.row_count,
                "latency_ms": result.elapsed_ms,
                "node_used": target,
                "mode": mode
            }
            
        except ClickHouseError as e:
            attempts += 1
            # Law 4: Fail fast on schema/data errors, retry on transient
            if e.code in (117, 241, 279):  # TOO_SLOW, NETWORK_ERROR, TIMEOUT
                if attempts >= max_attempts:
                    return _failover_to_replicas(query, fallback_replicas, clickhouse_client)
                continue
            elif e.code in (47, 62):  # BAD_ARGUMENTS, UNKNOWN_TABLE
                raise ValueError(f"Query validation failed: {e.message}") from e
            else:
                raise ClickHousePipelineError(f"Unexpected CH error {e.code}: {e.message}") from e
                
    return {"success": False, "error": "Max retries exhausted", "attempts": attempts}

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios


Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
  • Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
  • Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
  • Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
  • Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
  • Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
  • Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |

Skills enregistrées