L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Design et création · SKILL.md

phoenix-contexts

phoenix-contexts

Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+); Use when editing contexts, routers, or designing…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: phoenix-contexts description: Phoenix context design — creating/splitting contexts, Scope (1.8+); Use when editing contexts, routers, or designing…

Phoenix Contexts Reference

Ash projects: Ash.Domain replaces Phoenix contexts for data access — use the ash-framework skill. Context boundary and PubSub patterns still apply.

Reference for designing and implementing Phoenix contexts (bounded contexts).

Iron Laws — Never Violate These

  1. CONTEXTS OWN THEIR DATA — Never query another context's schema directly via Repo
  2. SCOPES ARE MANDATORY (Phoenix 1.8+) — Every context function MUST accept scope as first parameter
  3. THIN CONTROLLERS/LIVEVIEWS — Controllers translate HTTP, business logic stays in contexts
  4. NO SIDE EFFECTS IN SCHEMAS — Use Ecto.Multi for transactions with side effects

Context Structure

lib/my_app/
├── accounts/           # Context directory
│   ├── user.ex         # Schema
│   ├── scope.ex        # Scope struct (Phoenix 1.8+)
├── accounts.ex         # Context module (public API)

Phoenix 1.8+ Scopes (CRITICAL)

Context functions take the scope as their first parameter, so queries are filtered to the caller:

def list_posts(%Scope{} = scope) do
  from(p in Post, where: p.user_id == ^scope.user.id)
  |> Repo.all()
end

def create_post(%Scope{} = scope, attrs) do
  %Post{user_id: scope.user.id}
  |> Post.changeset(attrs)
  |> Repo.insert()
  |> broadcast(scope, :created)
end

Quick Decisions

When to SPLIT contexts?

  • Module exceeds ~400 lines
  • Functions don't share domain language
  • Could theoretically be a separate microservice
  • Team member could own it independently

When to KEEP together?

  • Resources share vocabulary and domain concepts
  • Functions frequently operate on same data together
  • Splitting would create excessive cross-context calls

Cross-Context References

# ✅ Reference by ID, convert at boundary
def create_order(%Scope{} = scope, user_id, product_ids) do
  with {:ok, user} <- Accounts.fetch_user(scope, user_id) do
    do_create_order(scope, user.id, product_ids)
  end
end

# ❌ Reaching into other context's internals
alias MyApp.Accounts.User  # Don't do this
Repo.all(from o in Order, join: u in User, ...)  # Don't query other schemas

Anti-patterns

WrongRight
Service objects (UserCreationService)Context functions (Accounts.create_user/2)
Repository pattern wrapping RepoRepo IS the repository
Direct Repo calls in controllersDelegate to context
Schema callbacks with side effectsUse Ecto.Multi

Version Notes

  • Phoenix 1.8+: Uses built-in %Scope{} struct for authorization context
  • Phoenix 1.7: Requires manual authorization context (see references/scopes-auth.md "Pre-Scopes Patterns")

References

For detailed patterns, see:

  • references/context-patterns.md - Full context module, PubSub, Multi, cross-boundary
  • references/scopes-auth.md - Scope struct, multi-tenant, authorization, plugs
  • references/routing-patterns.md - Verified routes, pipelines, API auth
  • references/plug-patterns.md - Function/module plugs, placement, guards
  • references/json-api-patterns.md - JSON controllers, FallbackController, API auth
Skills enregistrées