L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Documents · SKILL.md

security-incident-response

security-incident-response

Run or document a security incident response — contain, eradicate, recover, and learn. Use when responding to a breach/compromise/security incident, writing an IR plan or runbook, or producing a post-incident report. Produces a phase-by-phase response (triage, contain, eradicate, recover, post-incident) with the immediate actions, comms, evidence-handling, …

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: security-incident-response description: "Run or document a security incident response — contain, eradicate, recover, and learn. Use when responding to a breach/compromise/security incident, writing an IR plan or runbook, or producing a post-incident report. Produces a phase-by-phase response (triage, contain, eradicate, recover, post-incident) with the immediate actions, comms, evidence-handling, and a blameless review. For incidents on systems you own or defend."

Security Incident Response Skill

In a security incident, the order of operations matters: contain before you clean, preserve evidence before you wipe, and communicate deliberately. This skill drives a structured response through the standard phases, or documents one after the fact — with the immediate actions, decision points, comms, and a blameless post-incident review. For systems you own or are authorized to defend.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • What's happening — the observed incident (malware, unauthorized access, data exfiltration, ransomware, account compromise), and how it was detected.
  • Scope so far — affected systems/accounts/data, whether it's ongoing, entry point if known.
  • Environment & stakes — what's at risk (PII, funds, availability), regulatory/notification obligations.
  • Resources — who's responding, tooling/access available, and any IR plan already in place.

Output Format

Incident response: [incident]

Severity & summary — classify severity (e.g. SEV1–3) and state, in two lines, what's known and what's at stake.

Phase-by-phase actions:

  1. Triage & declare — confirm it's a real incident, assign severity and an incident lead, start a timeline/log.
  2. Contain — stop the bleeding without destroying evidence: isolate hosts, revoke sessions/keys, block IOCs, disable compromised accounts. Preserve forensic data (snapshots, logs, memory) before wiping.
  3. Eradicate — remove the root cause: close the entry point, remove malware/backdoors, patch the exploited flaw, rotate all potentially exposed credentials/secrets.
  4. Recover — restore from known-good, verify integrity, monitor closely for recurrence, return to normal service deliberately.
  5. Post-incident — a blameless review: timeline, root cause, what worked/didn't, and action items to prevent recurrence.

Communications — who to notify and when: internal (leadership, legal), customers, and any regulatory/breach-notification obligations (with the clock — many have strict deadlines). Draft the holding line.

Evidence & chain of custody — what to preserve and how, in case of legal/law-enforcement involvement.

IOCs & detection — indicators of compromise seen, and detections/monitoring to add.

Quality Checks

  • Severity is classified and an incident lead + running timeline are established first
  • Containment preserves evidence (snapshots/logs) before eradication/wiping
  • Eradication addresses the root cause and rotates all potentially exposed credentials
  • Recovery restores from known-good with heightened monitoring
  • Communications cover internal, customer, and regulatory/breach-notification duties with timing
  • The post-incident review is blameless and produces concrete prevention action items

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not wipe/rebuild before preserving forensic evidence — you lose the ability to understand the breach
  • Do not skip credential rotation — attackers persist via stolen keys/tokens
  • Do not go quiet on comms — silence with customers/regulators creates legal and trust damage
  • Do not blame individuals in the review — blameless analysis surfaces the real systemic causes
  • Do not declare "recovered" without monitoring for re-compromise
  • Do not act on systems you don't own or aren't authorized to defend

Based On

Incident-response practice (NIST SP 800-61 / SANS PICERL: prepare, identify, contain, eradicate, recover, lessons-learned).

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Respond to a breach/compromise/security incident."
  • "Write an IR plan."
  • "Produce a post-incident report."
Skills enregistrées