L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Design et création · SKILL.md

reference-check-script

reference-check-script

Run a rigorous candidate reference check that surfaces real signal. Use when asked to prepare or conduct reference calls for a job candidate, design reference questions, or build a reference-check rubric. Produces a structured question set, probing follow-ups, a red/yellow/green scoring rubric, and the legal guardrails — designed to get past 'they were grea…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: reference-check-script description: "Run a rigorous candidate reference check that surfaces real signal. Use when asked to prepare or conduct reference calls for a job candidate, design reference questions, or build a reference-check rubric. Produces a structured question set, probing follow-ups, a red/yellow/green scoring rubric, and the legal guardrails — designed to get past 'they were great' without leading the referee."

Reference Check Script Skill

A reference check fails when it's a formality — you call, they say "great to work with," you tick the box. This skill writes a call that actually de-risks the hire: questions that make it safe and easy for a referee to be honest, follow-ups that open the gap between polite and true, and a rubric that turns what you hear into a defensible signal.

Working from a brief

Given the role and what you need to validate, write the full script — tailor the questions to the specific concerns (the shaky interview signal, the seniority stretch, the manager-vs-IC question). Default to a ~20–25 minute call structure.

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not provided, else infer and label the assumption):

  • Role and level, and the 1–3 things to validate or de-risk (the open questions from interviews)
  • Referee relationship to the candidate (former manager / peer / report / client)
  • Reference type — candidate-provided or back-channel (changes how candid you probe)

Output Format

Framing (how to open)

A 2–3 sentence opener that sets candor: confidential, no scripted "sales pitch" needed, you're calibrating not gatekeeping. The single most important move — referees mirror the tone you set.

Question set (in order)

Grouped, with the intent of each noted:

  1. Relationship & context — how they worked together, for how long, on what.
  2. Scope & performance — what the candidate actually owned; where they ranked among peers.
  3. Strengths — with a concrete example ("tell me about a time…").
  4. Growth areas — asked as "where did they most need to grow / what coaching helped?" (not "weaknesses").
  5. Working style — how they handle conflict, feedback, ambiguity, pressure.
  6. The rehire question — "Would you hire them again? For what kind of role?" — and listen to the hesitation.

Probing follow-ups

The second question that opens the gap: "Can you give me an example?" · "How did that compare to others at that level?" · "What would their harshest fair critic say?" · silence (let them fill it).

Scoring rubric

Signal🟢 Green🟡 Yellow🔴 Red
Specificityconcrete examplesgeneric praiseevasive / can't recall
Rehireenthusiastic, unpromptedqualifiedhesitation or no
Growth honestycandid, coachablevaguedefensive / dodged

Plus a one-line overall read and any follow-up to run (e.g. a back-channel if listed refs are all glowing-but-generic).

Legal & fairness guardrails

Ask about job performance only. Do not ask about age, health/disability, family/pregnancy, religion, national origin, or other protected characteristics. Keep it consistent across candidates so it's comparable and defensible.

Quality Checks

  • The opener explicitly invites candor (not a box-tick)
  • Questions are open and non-leading — no "they were a great team player, right?"
  • At least one question forces a concrete example and one comparative ranking
  • The rehire question is included and its hesitation is scored, not just its answer
  • The rubric converts what's heard into 🟢🟡🔴 with an overall read
  • Protected-class questions are explicitly excluded; the script is consistent across candidates

Anti-Patterns

  • Leading questions that hand the referee the answer
  • Accepting "they were great" without a follow-up for a specific example
  • Only calling candidate-selected references (all curated to be positive)
  • Treating the call as confirmation, not investigation
  • Asking anything about protected characteristics
  • No rubric — a vibe instead of a comparable, documented signal

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Prepare reference calls for this candidate."
  • "Design reference questions."
  • "Build a reference-check rubric."
  • "What should I ask this candidate's references?"
Skills enregistrées