L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

pm-weekly-review

pm-weekly-review

Structure a PM's weekly review and planning session. Use when doing a weekly PM review, writing a weekly update, preparing for Monday planning, or reviewing sprint health. Produces a shareable weekly update covering metrics movement, shipping progress, blockers, insights, and next week's top 3 priorities.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: pm-weekly-review description: "Structure a PM's weekly review and planning session. Use when doing a weekly PM review, writing a weekly update, preparing for Monday planning, or reviewing sprint health. Produces a shareable weekly update covering metrics movement, shipping progress, blockers, insights, and next week's top 3 priorities."

PM Weekly Review Skill

Turn the chaotic end-of-week brain dump into a structured 20-minute ritual that keeps you, your team, and your stakeholders aligned — without a meeting.

Not quite this? Use weekly-review-ritual when you want a personal GTD-style weekly review rather than a product review.

The Weekly Review Structure (20 minutes)

5 min — Metrics check: What moved? What didn't? What's surprising? 5 min — Ship progress: What shipped? What slipped? What's blocked? 5 min — Insights: Any customer feedback, support tickets, or research findings? 5 min — Next week priorities: What are the 3 things that matter most?


Output Format

PM Weekly Review — Week of [Date]

Product Area: [What you own] Written by: [PM Name] Time to read: ~3 minutes


📊 Metrics This Week

MetricThis WeekLast WeekTargetTrend
[Primary metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →
[Secondary metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →
[Health metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →

Notable movement:

  • [What changed and why — 1 sentence each]

Concern to watch:

  • [Anything trending in the wrong direction]

🚢 This Week's Progress

Shipped:

  • ✅ [What went live] — [1-line impact or observation]

In Progress:

  • 🔄 [Feature/initiative] — [% complete or current status]

Slipped / Blocked:

  • ⚠️ [What didn't happen] — Reason: [brief] — Action: [who's unblocking it]

Carry-forward to next week:

  • [Item + why it's carrying over]

💡 Insights & Signals

Customer feedback:

  • "[Quote or paraphrase]" — Source: [user/channel] — Theme: [tag]

Support signals:

  • [Top ticket category this week + volume]
  • [Anything that signals a product gap]

Research / data:

  • [Any discovery from user interviews, analytics, or experiments]

🎯 Next Week — Top 3 Priorities

#PriorityWhy This WeekOwnerDone =
1[Most important thing][Reason it can't wait][Name][Clear definition of done]
2[Second priority][Why][Name][Done criteria]
3[Third priority][Why][Name][Done criteria]

Decisions needed:

  • [Any decision that's blocking progress — who needs to make it]

Asks / dependencies:

  • [What you need from engineering / design / data / leadership]

🧠 Reflection (Optional but powerful)

What's one thing from this week I'd do differently? [Your honest answer — 1–2 sentences]

What's the biggest unknown I'm carrying into next week? [Name the uncertainty explicitly]


Required Inputs

Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).

  • Product area or team you own
  • Key metrics this week (with values and prior week comparison)
  • What shipped, slipped, or is blocked
  • Top 3 priorities for next week
  • Any customer insights or signals (optional)

Quality Checks

  • Metrics include period-over-period comparison (not just raw numbers)
  • Every blocked item has an owner and a specific unblocking action
  • Next week's priorities have a "why this week" rationale
  • Total length is under 400 words (skimmable in 3 minutes)
  • Reflection section is honest, not aspirational

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not report metrics without comparing to target or the prior week — absolute numbers without context are not useful
  • Do not list blockers without a named owner and proposed resolution — unowned blockers stay blocked
  • Do not write a weekly review that is longer than one page — it must be scannable in under 2 minutes
  • Do not include more than 3 priorities for next week — a list of 8 "top priorities" means nothing is prioritised
  • Do not skip the insights section — observations that inform future decisions are a PM's key value add

Guidelines

  • Keep the whole document under 400 words — if stakeholders won't read it, it doesn't exist
  • The reflection section is for you, not your stakeholders — keep it honest
  • Always name a clear owner for every blocked item — "the team will figure it out" is a blocker in disguise
  • Recommend sending this by end of Friday — Monday morning is too late to course-correct
  • If three weeks of weekly reviews show the same blocked item, escalate immediately

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Doing a weekly PM review."
  • "Write a weekly update."
  • "Prepare for Monday planning."
  • "Review sprint health."
Skills enregistrées