L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Productivité · SKILL.md

interview-me

interview-me

Elicit the real requirements by interviewing the requester BEFORE building or writing anything — one question at a time, until the brief is buildable. Use when a request is vague ('make me a dashboard', 'write something for the board'), when past deliverables missed the mark, or when the user says 'interview me' / 'ask me questions first'. Produces a valida…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: interview-me description: "Elicit the real requirements by interviewing the requester BEFORE building or writing anything — one question at a time, until the brief is buildable. Use when a request is vague ('make me a dashboard', 'write something for the board'), when past deliverables missed the mark, or when the user says 'interview me' / 'ask me questions first'. Produces a validated brief: goal, audience, constraints, success criteria, and explicit non-goals — then, and only then, the work."

Interview Me Skill

The most expensive failure mode in AI-assisted work isn't bad output — it's excellent output to the wrong brief. This skill inverts the flow: before producing anything, interview the requester like a senior consultant would, one question at a time, until the brief can survive contact with the deliverable.

What This Skill Produces

  • A validated brief: goal, audience, constraints, success criteria, non-goals — confirmed by the requester
  • Then the actual deliverable, built against that brief
  • A visible assumption ledger for anything the interview couldn't settle

When to Trigger (and when not)

Interview when: the request is one sentence for a multi-hour deliverable · the audience or purpose is unstated · two readings of the request lead to different artifacts · the stakes are high (board, customer-facing, irreversible). Skip the interview when the request is already specific, the pattern is established from earlier in the conversation, or the cost of a wrong draft is lower than the cost of five questions — say "I have enough to start" and start.

Interview Method

  1. One question at a time. A wall of seven questions gets skimmed answers to all and real answers to none. Ask, absorb, let the answer shape the next question.
  2. Sequence by decision-weight. The order that converges fastest:
    • The moment of use — "who reads/uses this, and what are they doing in that moment?" (settles more downstream decisions than any other question)
    • The definition of success — "what happens if this works? what would make you send it back?"
    • The constraints that bind — length, tone, format, deadline, politics ("anything this must NOT say?")
    • The prior art — "has something like this been tried/shown before? what happened?"
    • The non-goals — "what's adjacent that we're deliberately not doing?"
  3. Interrogate the difference, not the topic. Weak: "tell me more about the dashboard." Strong: "if this dashboard existed today, what decision would someone make differently this week?"
  4. Offer forks, not open fields, when the requester is fuzzy. "Is this closer to (a) a live monitor the team glances at, or (b) a monthly readout for your boss?" — concrete options unstick vague askers far faster than "what do you envision?"
  5. Know when to stop. 3-6 questions settles most briefs. Stop when a new answer wouldn't change what you'd build. Then play the brief back in ≤5 lines and get an explicit "yes, build that."
  6. Ledger what's still open. Unresolved items become labelled assumptions in the deliverable, never silent guesses.

Output Format

During: one question per turn, with a one-line reason when it isn't obvious ("asking because it changes the format entirely").

The brief playback:

Building: [artifact] for [audience in their moment] so that [the decision/outcome]. Success: … · Constraints: … · Not doing: … Assumed (unconfirmed): … Confirm and I'll build it.

Quality Checks

  • Questions were asked one at a time, each shaped by the previous answer
  • The moment-of-use and success-definition questions were asked (or their answers were already known)
  • The brief was played back and explicitly confirmed before production began
  • Every unresolved item appears in the assumption ledger, labelled
  • The interview stopped when answers stopped changing the build — no ritual questioning

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not fire a questionnaire — seven questions at once produces skim-answers and resentment
  • Do not interview when the brief is already clear — process applied without judgment is friction
  • Do not ask questions whose answers wouldn't change the deliverable — every question spends the requester's patience
  • Do not start building mid-interview "to save time" — half-brief work anchors the requester to the wrong draft
  • Do not skip the playback — the interview's value is captured only when the requester says "yes, that"

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Interview me before you build anything."
  • "Ask me questions first."
  • "Make me a dashboard."
  • "Work out what I actually need."
Skills enregistrées