L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Design et création · SKILL.md

community-moderation-policy

community-moderation-policy

Write a fair, enforceable community moderation policy. Use when standing up or overhauling moderation for a forum, Discord, Slack, subreddit, or any user community. Produces a clear code of conduct with examples, a graduated enforcement ladder tied to specific triggers, an appeals process, moderator guidelines, and the handling for the severe cases (threats…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: community-moderation-policy description: "Write a fair, enforceable community moderation policy. Use when standing up or overhauling moderation for a forum, Discord, Slack, subreddit, or any user community. Produces a clear code of conduct with examples, a graduated enforcement ladder tied to specific triggers, an appeals process, moderator guidelines, and the handling for the severe cases (threats, doxxing, brigading) that need immediate action. Governs member conduct in a user community — distinct from [[community-management-playbook]], which manages a brand's own social-media channels (comments, DMs, tone, response templates)."

Community Moderation Policy Skill

A moderation policy fails when it's vague ("be respectful") or applied inconsistently — members can't predict what's allowed, and mods burn out making judgment calls with no backing. This skill writes a policy that is enforceable: concrete rules with examples, a ladder that matches consequence to behavior, and the process that makes enforcement feel fair even to the person on the receiving end.

Working from a brief

Given the community (platform, size, purpose, audience), write the full policy — tune severity and tone to the space (a professional Slack ≠ a gaming Discord). Keep the public-facing rules short and human; put the operational detail in the moderator guidelines.

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not provided, else infer and label the assumption):

  • The community — platform, rough size, purpose, and audience norms
  • The values / what "good" looks like here, and the behaviors you most want to prevent
  • Team — how many moderators, volunteer or staff, tools available
  • Legal/brand constraints — platform ToS, regulated topics, company brand line

Output Format

Code of conduct (public-facing)

Short, plain, and specific. The core rules stated positively where possible, each with a one-line example of what crosses the line so it's not ambiguous. Cover the usual: harassment, hate speech, spam/self-promo, off-topic, NSFW, illegal content — scoped to this community.

Enforcement ladder

Consequence matched to behavior and repetition:

LevelTriggerActionWho can apply
1first minor / borderlinefriendly warning, edit/removeany mod
2repeat / clear violationformal warning, temp muteany mod
3serious or repeatedtemp ban (e.g. 7 days)senior mod
4severe / incorrigiblepermanent banadmin
Zero-tolerancethreats, doxxing, CSAM, targeted harassmentimmediate ban + reportadmin, no warning

Appeals process

How a member contests an action: where to appeal, who reviews (not the acting mod), the timeline, and what can/can't be overturned. Appeals are what make the ladder feel legitimate.

Moderator guidelines (internal)

  • Consistency — decide by the rule, not the person; document every Level 2+ action.
  • Conflicts — don't moderate a thread you're personally in; hand off.
  • Edge cases — borderline calls, sarcasm/context, brigading and coordinated behavior, when to lock vs remove.
  • Transparency — what's communicated to the member vs. handled quietly; a mod log.
  • Mod wellbeing — rotation for heavy content, escalation for threats to mods.

Quality Checks

  • Every rule is concrete enough to predict a call, with an example of the line
  • The ladder ties specific triggers to specific actions and who may apply them
  • Severe cases (threats, doxxing, CSAM) are zero-tolerance and route to reporting
  • An appeals path exists and is reviewed by someone other than the acting mod
  • Mod guidelines cover consistency, conflicts of interest, and documentation
  • Tone and severity fit this community; it aligns with the platform ToS

Anti-Patterns

  • Vague rules ("don't be a jerk") with no examples — unenforceable and arbitrary-feeling
  • A single "ban" hammer with no graduated steps for minor issues
  • Inconsistent enforcement by mood or by who the member is
  • No appeals process (every action feels final and unjust)
  • Unwritten rules enforced as if everyone knew them
  • Warning-laddering genuine threats or doxxing instead of acting immediately

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write moderation rules for our Discord."
  • "Write a code of conduct for our forum."
  • "Overhaul moderation for our subreddit."
  • "Set up an enforcement ladder for our community."
Skills enregistrées