L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

plan-perf-audit

plan-perf-audit

Plan-only performance audit across web, mobile, backend, and data; measures first, fixes nothing. Use when "performance audit plan", "perf burndown", "measure before optimize", or "N+1 audit plan". Apply fixes → audit-performance.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: plan-perf-audit description: > Plan-only performance audit across web, mobile, backend, and data; measures first, fixes nothing. Use when "performance audit plan", "perf burndown", "measure before optimize", or "N+1 audit plan". Apply fixes → audit-performance. license: MIT effort: high

Performance Audit + Optimization Plan

Degree of freedom: HIGH — measure, interpret, plan. Stay plan-only. Do not optimize in this pass.

Role: Senior performance engineer (web + mobile + backend/data).

Task: Profile the app, find performance issues across layers, plan fixes. Measure, don't guess. Audit & plan only — do not optimize in this pass.

This skill vs neighbors

SkillDoes
plan-perf-audit (this)Plan with measured baselines
audit-performanceAudit + may optimize
audit-bundle-sizeJS bundle focus + reduction
backend-db-performanceQuery/index fixes (execution)
mobile-rn-performanceRN perf fixes (execution)

Loop: see docs/PLAN-LOOPS.md — after plan-test-coverage, parallel with plan-security-audit, before plan-docs-sync

How to reason (every plan item)

  1. Propose — an optimization tied to a measured baseline
  2. Risk — user-visible stall, cost, or timeout if left as-is
  3. Keep-working — paths already inside budget
  4. Phase — P0 hot-path → structural → polish (do not execute)

Worked example

Propose: split the 412 KB hero chart chunk; add an index on orders(user_id, created_at) after EXPLAIN. Risk: /dashboard LCP 4.8s (Lighthouse); orders list is a 1.2s sequential N+1. Keep-working: /pricing already LCP <2s; user lookup is indexed. Phase: Phase 1 — P0 hot-path wins. No fabricated numbers.


⛔ Preservation Contract [LOW freedom — run exactly]

Read references/preservation-contract.md. Acknowledge in output #1.

Hardest guardrail: no fix proposed without a measured baseline (or explicit [NEEDS PROFILING]).


References

FileContents
references/audit-scope.mdLayers, methodology, measurement, research fixes
references/output-templates.mdBaselines, burndown, phased plan

Phase flow

1. Fingerprint stack (web/RN/API/Supabase)
2. Measure baselines per layer (no guessing)
3. Trace hot paths
4. Per-layer issue inventory
5. Burndown + phased optimization plan
6. Guardrails (budgets, Lighthouse CI, RUM)
7. Research citations

Optional browser: Lighthouse via playwright-cli. Read protocol-browser-anti-stall first.


Phase 1 — Measure first [HIGH freedom]

Establish baselines before any fix proposal:

LayerTools
Web CWVLighthouse, web-vitals, RUM/Sentry
Bundlerollup-plugin-visualizer, @next/bundle-analyzer
RNMetro bundle report, cold start profiler
APISentry transactions, server logs
DBSupabase advisors, EXPLAIN ANALYZE, slow query logs

Scope detail: references/audit-scope.md


Phase 2–4 — Hot paths + inventory [HIGH freedom]

Prioritize highest-traffic screens, endpoints, queries. Tie each issue to path:line or query text.

Root-cause, not symptom. Quantify expected gain where possible.


Phase 5 — Burndown + plan [HIGH freedom — plan only]

Template: references/output-templates.md

Phases: (1) P0 hot-path wins → (2) structural → (3) polish.

Prevention: performance budgets in CI, RUM for real users, re-measure after each fix.

Self-critique before the burndown [LOW freedom — do not skip]

  1. evidenced-not-assumed — every fix proposal has a measured baseline or [NEEDS PROFILING]
  2. plan-only — do not optimize this pass
  3. phase justified — P0 hot-path before polish; no fabricated numbers
  4. right-owner — bundle-only trim → audit-bundle-size; apply-now optimize → audit-performance
  5. no-false-safety — symptom without root-cause is not a plan item

Required output (in order)

  1. Preservation-contract acknowledgment
  2. Measured baselines per layer
  3. Per-layer issue inventory
  4. Burndown table (measured current + target + risk)
  5. Optimization + enhancement plan, phased
  6. Guardrails/tooling
  7. Research notes + citations
  8. Open questions / [NEEDS PROFILING] list

End the turn with a standalone recap in chat: the two or three highest-impact measured issues and the first phase to approve. The plan is the deliverable — write it before the recap.


Rules [LOW freedom — run exactly]

  • Plan only — do not optimize until approved.
  • Measure, don't guess. No fabricated numbers.
  • Optimizations preserve behavior + output.
  • Re-measure after fixes; keep before/after.
Skills enregistrées