L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

seo-keyword-strategist

seo-keyword-strategist

Use when researching keywords, mapping search intent, building topic clusters, detecting keyword cannibalization, or optimizing content for entity-based search. Covers keyword strategy, intent classification, clustering, and cannibalization diagnosis.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: seo-keyword-strategist description: Use when researching keywords, mapping search intent, building topic clusters, detecting keyword cannibalization, or optimizing content for entity-based search. Covers keyword strategy, intent classification, clustering, and cannibalization diagnosis. family: seo

SEO Keyword Strategist

Overview

Keywords are entity pointers, not density targets. Google's Knowledge Graph holds 54+ billion entities and 1.6+ trillion facts. Modern keyword strategy is about mapping content to entities and intent, not counting keyword occurrences.

Dead Metrics — Stop Using These

MythReality
Keyword density 0.5-1.5%No correlation with rankings (2026 study, 1,536 results). Google uses NLP, not word counting
LSI keywordsConfirmed myth. John Mueller: "There's no such thing as LSI keywords." Use "semantically related terms" instead
Content scoring tools predict rankingsCorrelation 0.17-0.30 (weak). Use for gap finding, not score chasing
Search volume is accurateGoogle Keyword Planner overestimates 54% of the time. Use volumes as directional only

Intent Classification

Intent% of SearchesContent TypeAI Overview Risk
Informational52.65%Guides, how-tos, explainersHIGH — AI answers directly
Navigational32.15%Brand/product pagesLOW — users want specific site
Commercial14.51%Comparisons, reviews, "best X"MEDIUM — sweet spot for clicks
Transactional0.69%Product/checkout pagesLOW — users want to buy

Priority: Target commercial intent keywords — high conversion potential, not fully absorbed by AI Overviews. Informational head terms are increasingly zero-click (58.5% US, 83% when AI Overviews appear).

Entity-First Keyword Strategy

Google shifted from "strings" to "things." Optimize for entities, not keyword strings.

Three pillars:

  1. Precision — Each page = one canonical entity. Align title, H1, and schema mainEntityOfPage
  2. Coverage — Site collectively covers all subtopics that define your niche (topical authority)
  3. Connectivity — Internal links mirror Knowledge Graph entity relationships

Practical steps:

  • Place primary keyword in title, H1, first paragraph, and 1-2 subheadings naturally
  • Cover expected subtopics comprehensively (check People Also Ask for gaps)
  • Use schema markup to explicitly declare entities (Product, Organization, etc.)
  • Write for meaning, not matching — Google's NLP (BERT, MUM, Gemini) understands synonyms and context

Keyword Clustering

SERP-based clustering is the gold standard. If 3+ of the same URLs appear in top 10 for two keywords, they belong in one cluster.

Rule: One search intent = one keyword cluster = one page.

Method:

  1. Collect target keywords
  2. Check SERP overlap (same pages ranking = same cluster)
  3. Verify intent alignment (informational vs commercial)
  4. Assign one cluster per page — never create separate pages for keywords in the same cluster

Cannibalization Detection

Not every instance of multiple pages ranking for the same keyword is a problem. Ahrefs reports 9,700 cases on their own site — almost none need fixing.

It's a problem when:

  • Pages swap positions 3+ times in 7 days (red flag)
  • Rankings drop 5-15 positions when "wrong" page is selected
  • CTR is split between pages serving identical intent

It's NOT a problem when:

  • Both pages rank stably in top positions
  • Pages serve different intents (blog post = informational, product page = transactional)
  • Total traffic from both exceeds what one page would get

Detection via GSC API:

Query dimensions: ["query", "page"]
Group by query → count distinct pages
Flag: queries where count(page) > 1 AND positions swap frequently

Resolution decision:

SignalAction
Position swapping, same intentConsolidate — merge weaker into stronger, 301 redirect. Case studies show +200-466% traffic
Different intents, both stableLeave it — keyword diversification is beneficial
Same intent, one clearly dominantRe-optimize — change weaker page to target different cluster

Zero-Click Strategy

58.5% of US searches result in zero clicks. When AI Overviews appear, 83% zero-click.

  • For informational keywords: optimize for AI Overview citation as brand visibility (even without clicks)
  • For commercial keywords: these retain higher CTR — prioritize them
  • Track CTR alongside rankings — #1 with 0.6% CTR on an AIO query may be less valuable than #5 without AIO

Anti-Patterns

Don'tWhy
Target keyword density percentagesDead metric — no ranking correlation
Use "LSI keyword" toolsLSI is a myth; use topical gap analysis instead
Chase content scoring tool numbers0.17-0.30 correlation; score ≠ ranking
Trust search volume precision54% overestimated; use as directional only
Create separate pages for same-cluster keywordsCauses cannibalization; one cluster = one page
Treat all multi-page rankings as cannibalizationOften beneficial; check for actual harm first
Ignore zero-click data58.5% of searches get no clicks; factor into strategy
Skills enregistrées