executing-plans
executing-plans
Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
suede-cold-emailSuede-owned B2B cold-email discipline for evidence-based personalization, subject lines, opening lines, concise bodies, one clear CTA, and bounded follow-up sequences. Use when writing or repairing outbound email to qualified prospects. NOT FOR: building or qualifying the prospect list (use suede-prospecting), lifecycle or nurture email (use suede-emails), …
Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs
Use this Suede cold-email playbook to write concise, evidence-grounded outreach that sounds human and respects the recipient.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Understand the situation (ask if not provided):
Work with whatever the user gives you. If they have a strong signal and a clear value prop, that's enough to write. Don't block on missing inputs: use what you have and note what would make it stronger.
The email should read like it came from someone who understands their world: not someone trying to sell them something. Use contractions. Read it aloud. If it sounds like marketing copy, rewrite it.
Cold email is ruthlessly short. If a sentence doesn't move the reader toward replying, cut it. The best cold emails feel like they could have been shorter, not longer.
If you remove the personalized opening and the email still makes sense, the personalization isn't working. The observation should naturally lead into why you're reaching out.
See personalization.md for the 4-level system and research signals.
The reader should see their own situation reflected back. "You/your" should dominate over "I/we." Don't open with who you are or what your company does.
Interest-based CTAs ("Worth exploring?" / "Would this be useful?") beat meeting requests. One CTA per email. Make it easy to say yes with a one-line reply.
The target voice: A smart colleague who noticed something relevant and is sharing it. Conversational but not sloppy. Confident but not pushy.
Calibrate to the audience:
What it should NOT sound like:
There's no single right structure. Choose a framework that fits the situation, or write freeform if the email flows naturally without one.
Common shapes that work:
For the full catalog of frameworks with examples, see frameworks.md.
Short, boring, internal-looking. The subject line's only job is to get the email opened: not to sell.
See subject-lines.md for the full data.
Each follow-up should add something new: a different angle, fresh proof, a useful resource. "Just checking in" gives the reader no reason to respond.
See follow-up-sequences.md for cadence, angle rotation, and breakup email templates.
Run this pass on the draft before presenting it. Every item resolves to something you can observe in the text, not a feeling about it.
Any item that fails means rewrite before presenting. Do not hand over a draft with a caveat attached to it.
Deliver every email in this shape, with these field labels verbatim.
Subject: [2-4 words, lowercase]
Body: (NN words, target under 75)
[the email exactly as it would be pasted into the send tool]
CTA: [the single ask, quoted from the body]
Personalization source: [the specific signal this email traces to (the post, the filing,
the job ad, the release) with enough detail that the user can confirm it is real]
Personalization source: is required on every email. It is what makes the "do not invent personalization" boundary auditable. If you cannot name a real source, you do not have personalization, and the opening line has to change.
Emit the follow-up table only when the user asked for a sequence rather than a single message:
| # | Send day | New angle it carries | Subject |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | ... | ... |
| 2 | +3 | ... | ... |
3-5 emails total: see follow-up-sequences.md for cadence and angle rotation. Omit the table entirely for a single-message request.
The references contain performance data if you need to make informed choices:
Use this data to inform your writing: not as a checklist to satisfy.
suede-prospecting.suede-emails.suede-product-marketing or suede-sales-enablement.suede-revops.suede-deslop.suede-cold-email.