L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

react-testing

react-testing

Test React components with RTL and Jest/Vitest. Use when writing React component tests with React Testing Library, Jest, or Vitest.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: react-testing description: Test React components with RTL and Jest/Vitest. Use when writing React component tests with React Testing Library, Jest, or Vitest. metadata: triggers: files: - '/*.test.tsx' - '/*.spec.tsx' keywords: - render - screen - userEvent - expect

React Testing

Priority: P1 (HIGH)

Core Philosophy

  • Test User Behavior, Not Implementation Mechanics: Tests should verify that the application works for end users, rather than checking how components are implemented internally.
  • Resistance to Refactoring: Refactoring component internal state, props, or hooks must never break passing tests as long as the user-visible behavior remains unchanged.

Core Rule Anchors (Four Pillars Enforcement)

  • [WEB-TEST-01] Tripartite Naming & AAA Cadence: Test names must follow Method_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior and adhere strictly to Arrange-Act-Assert. Example: SubmitOrder_WhenCreditLimitExceeded_DisplaysBlockedBanner.
  • [WEB-TEST-02] Accessible Roles & UserEvent: Always use userEvent.setup() for user interactions (await user.click(...)) and query elements via accessible roles (getByRole, findByLabelText). Avoid fireEvent and ban arbitrary CSS / DOM hierarchy selectors.
  • [WEB-TEST-03] Ban on Component State & Prop Inspection: Never inspect internal component state or props directly. Never write trivial echo assertions (expect(true).toBe(true)). Assert on visible user outcomes and DOM state changes.
  • [WEB-TEST-04] Mock Service Worker (MSW) Network Mocking: Intercept network requests at the HTTP boundary via MSW rather than mocking internal Apollo Client hooks (useQuery) or Redux dispatchers. Tests must verify true end-to-end component data flow.
  • [WEB-TEST-05] Bug-First Regression Lock: Every PR resolving a bug ticket or with title fix(...) must introduce a test reproducing the defect prior to the fix.

Implementation Guidelines

  • Standards: Use React Testing Library (RTL) with Vitest or Jest. Follow Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern ([WEB-TEST-01]).
  • User-Centric Selection: Prioritize accessible queries: getByRole, findByLabelText, getByText. Treat data-testid only as an explicit fallback for complex UI elements, and strictly ban CSS class or DOM hierarchy selectors ([WEB-TEST-02]).
  • Behavioral Assertions: Test user workflows using userEvent.setup() (e.g., const user = userEvent.setup(); await user.click(...)) rather than firing raw synthetic DOM events with fireEvent ([WEB-TEST-02]).
  • Network Boundary Mocking (MSW): Mock API network requests at the HTTP layer using Mock Service Worker (MSW) instead of mocking Apollo Client hooks (useQuery, useMutation) or Redux dispatchers. This validates end-to-end component data flow without leaking mock internals. Never call real APIs in unit/integration tests ([WEB-TEST-04]).
  • Asynchrony: Use await screen.findBy* for elements rendered after asynchronous actions. Use waitFor(() => ...) only for complex non-element updates or assertion retries.
  • Architecture: Test behavior, not implementation. Never inspect component internal state or props ([WEB-TEST-03]).
  • Mocks: Mock expensive third-party libraries (e.g., framer-motion, react-router) or heavy assets at the boundary to speed up tests.
  • Visuals: Use Snapshot testing sparingly for stable, small UI components. Banish large snapshot tests of dynamic pages. Manual a11y checks with jest-axe.

Anti-Patterns & Banned Smells

  • [WEB-TEST-01] Vague test names: Banish non-descriptive names; adhere to Method_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior.
  • [WEB-TEST-02] No Synthetic Events or CSS Selectors: Avoid fireEvent; always use userEvent.setup(). Ban querying by CSS classes or DOM hierarchy.
  • [WEB-TEST-03] No Testing Implementation Details: Never inspect or assert on component internal state or props directly.
  • [WEB-TEST-04] No Hook / Dispatcher Mocking: Do not mock Apollo Client hooks or Redux dispatchers directly; intercept network requests via MSW handlers.
  • [WEB-TEST-05] No Bug Fix Without Reproduction: Ban bug fix PRs without defect reproduction tests.
  • No Large Dynamic Snapshots: Ban snapshot tests of dynamic pages, lists, or complex containers.
  • No Shallow Rendering: Render the full component tree with required providers.
  • No Wait-for-Find: Prefer await screen.findBy* over waitFor(() => screen.getBy*).

References

See references/REFERENCE.md for MSW API mocking, Context testing, form testing, and React Router patterns.

Code

test('submits form', async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  render(<LoginForm />);

  await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'test@test.com');
  await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /login/i }));

  expect(await screen.findByText(/welcome/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});

Canonical response anchors

When this skill applies, preserve the following domain terminology or equivalent concrete examples in the answer when relevant:

  • findByText
  • getByRole
Skills enregistrées