L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

battle-test

battle-test

Deep audit of a skills directory against the Skill Creator standard. Produces a scored report and phased remediation plan.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: battle-test description: "Deep audit of a skills directory against the Skill Creator standard. Produces a scored report and phased remediation plan." metadata: internal: true triggers: keywords: - battle test - workflow

Battle Test Skill

[!IMPORTANT] Deep audit of a skills directory against the Skill Creator standard. Produces a scored report and phased remediation plan.

Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

Instructions

When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:

⚔️ Battle Test Orchestrator

Goal: Evaluate every SKILL.md in the target directory against common-skill-creator. Deliver a quantified health report and prioritized remediation plan.


Step 1 — Target Discovery & Tech Stack

Identify the tech stack and all skill files.

# Count total skills per category
find . -name "SKILL.md" | sed 's|/[^/]*/SKILL.md||' | sort | uniq -c

Step 2 — Frontmatter Audit (Breadth Scan)

Run scans to detect format and structure violations.

  1. Check for missing mandatory sections: grep -rL "triggers:\|priority:\|Anti-Patterns" <SKILLS>/
  2. Check for broad glob triggers: grep -r "src/\*\*" <SKILLS>/
  3. Check for length limits: find . -name "SKILL.md" -exec awk 'END{if(NR>100) print FILENAME": "NR" lines"}' {} \;

Step 3 — Deep Audit & Evidence Classification

Evaluate skills against <SKILLS>/common/common-skill-creator/references/rubric.md:

  1. Structural Checks: Line count (≤100), frontmatter schema, surgical triggers.
  2. Textual Utility: Actionability, procedural clarity; verify NO answer-anchor padding.
  3. Executable Outcomes: Runnable verification commands, deterministic test/verifier pass.
  4. Rule Retirement & Ablation: Identify retirement candidates via repeated ablation; preserve safety controls until deterministic runtime replacements exist.

Step 4 — Scored Report

Scoring Algorithm: Start at 100 points for each category. Apply deductions for findings (🔴-15 / 🟠-8 / 🟡-3 / 🔵-1). Deduct for answer-anchor padding or bloated narrative.

📊 Report Format

Output the report using the Battle Test Report and Phased Plan templates in: <SKILLS>/common/common-skill-creator/references/rubric.md when synced.

Step 5 — Interactive Follow-up

  1. "Generate a task.md for Phase 1 remediation?"
  2. "Fix the worst offender in [category] now?"
  3. "Deep-dive audit on a specific category (e.g., security)?"
Skills enregistrées