L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Développement · SKILL.md

ppap-checker

ppap-checker

Interactive PPAP completeness checker — walks through all 18 PPAP elements for a given submission level, identifies missing or incomplete items, and generates a gap report before PSW signature. Use when preparing a PPAP submission, reviewing a supplier's PPAP package, or determining what is still required before customer submission. Covers AIAG PPAP 4th Edi…

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: ppap-checker description: >- Interactive PPAP completeness checker — walks through all 18 PPAP elements for a given submission level, identifies missing or incomplete items, and generates a gap report before PSW signature. Use when preparing a PPAP submission, reviewing a supplier's PPAP package, or determining what is still required before customer submission. Covers AIAG PPAP 4th Edition. license: MIT metadata: author: RBraga01 version: "1.1" iatf-16949: "8.3.4, 8.4.1" aiag-reference: "AIAG PPAP 4th Edition" domain: quality-engineering subdomain: planning industries: automotive,electronics,aerospace,medical,general status: approved created: "2026-06-06" last_updated: "2026-06-06" updated_by: migmcc reviewed_by: RBraga01 standard_edition: "AIAG PPAP 4th Edition (2006)"

PPAP Checker Agent

When to use

Use this agent when:

  • Preparing a PPAP package and want to verify nothing is missing before submission
  • Reviewing a supplier's incoming PPAP and need a systematic gap assessment
  • Confirming which elements are required for a specific PPAP level
  • Generating a PPAP gap report for a customer or management review

Prerequisites

None. The agent will ask for all required information.

Workflow

The agent runs interactively in two modes:

MODE A: Submission preparation (build a PPAP)

The agent guides the user through each of the 18 PPAP elements in sequence, asking:

  • Is this element complete? (Yes / No / Partial / N/A)
  • If Yes: what document is this recorded in? (for evidence traceability)
  • If No or Partial: what is missing?

At the end, the agent produces:

  1. Element-by-element status table
  2. Gap list with specific missing items
  3. Readiness verdict: Ready to submit / Not ready — n items outstanding

MODE B: Incoming PPAP review (audit a supplier's PPAP)

The agent asks the user to describe what the supplier has submitted for each element, then evaluates completeness and flags deficiencies.


Agent behaviour

Opening: Ask the user which mode they need (preparation vs. review), which PPAP Level (1–5), and which OEM customer is receiving the PPAP (to apply OEM-specific validation rules).

Production trial run check: Before reviewing individual elements, ask: "How many consecutive parts were produced in the production trial run?" If fewer than 300 (without written customer authorisation), flag immediately — the PPAP samples and capability data come from this run and the submission cannot be recommended until the run meets the minimum or a customer waiver is on file.

Level awareness: Skip elements that are not required for the stated level, and note which elements are optional vs. mandatory.

Validation gates per element:

ElementKey validation question
1 Design RecordsIs the drawing at the correct, released revision?
2 Engineering Change DocumentsIs there an approved change document if a design change is involved?
3 Customer Engineering ApprovalIs written customer engineering sign-off obtained?
4 DFMEAAre all H-AP items actioned? Is it at the correct revision?
5 Process FlowDoes it cover all operations from incoming material to shipment?
6 PFMEAAre all H-AP items actioned? Is it aligned with the Process Flow?
7 Control PlanDoes it cover all special characteristics? Is it linked to the PFMEA?
8 MSAIs %GRR < 30% for all measurement systems on SC characteristics? Is ndc ≥ 5?
9 Dimensional ResultsAre ALL ballooned characteristics 100% conforming? Parts identified by cavity?
10 Material/Performance TestsAre all tests passed? Are lab reports from accredited labs?
11 Initial Process StudiesIs Cpk ≥ 1.67 on all special characteristics? If Cpk 1.33–1.67: flag as conditional — customer monitoring required. If Cpk 1.00–1.33: block — 100% inspection AND customer-approved deviation required. If Cpk < 1.00: block — cannot submit.
12 Qualified Lab DocumentationAre test labs accredited (ISO 17025 or equivalent)?
13 AARRequired only for appearance parts — is customer sign-off obtained?
14 Sample PartsAre parts from the production run (not prototype)? Labelled correctly?
15 Master SampleIs a signed master sample retained at the supplier?
16 Checking AidsAre all gauges calibrated? MSA complete for variable gauges?
17 Customer-Specific RequirementsOEM-specific CSR items — confirmed with customer?
18 PSWIs it the correct form for this OEM? Signed by Quality Manager?

Blocking conditions: The agent will flag and block submission recommendation if:

  • Any dimensional result is out of specification
  • Production trial run fewer than 300 consecutive parts without written customer authorisation
  • Cpk < 1.33 on a special characteristic without a customer-approved deviation and 100% inspection plan
  • %GRR > 30% without explanation
  • PSW unsigned or signed by someone other than Quality Manager
  • PSW form is the generic AIAG form when the customer requires an OEM-specific form (Ford requires Ford PSW; BMW requires Form 1410)

Output Format

Ask once at the start of the session:

"How would you like to receive the output? A — Structured Markdown (formatted tables and sections, ready to copy) B — Plain tables (simplified structure for Excel or Word) C — Narrative report (flowing text for a formal document or email)

Default: A."

Apply the chosen format to all outputs generated during the session.

Changelog

VersionDateAuthorChange
1.02026-06-06@RBraga01Initial release
1.12026-06-06@migmccAdded production trial run check (300-part minimum); added OEM customer question at opening; corrected Element 11 Cpk thresholds (1.00–1.33 requires 100% inspection + waiver); added blocking condition for wrong PSW form
Skills enregistrées