L’interface est localisée ; les présentations et documents des Skills sont traduits automatiquement par IA dans votre langue. Le code, les commandes, chemins et termes techniques restent en version originale, et le document de l’auteur fait foi.
Explorer les Skills
Données et recherche · SKILL.md

long-term-impact-evaluation

long-term-impact-evaluation

Choose methods for measuring long-term product impact after or beyond an A/B test. Use when comparing long-term holdbacks, post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, CLV models, delayed effects, short-term versus long-term metric tradeoffs, or lower-cost alternatives to long-term holdbacks.

Independent GitHub snapshot · Automated classification · Original documentation governs

Documentation de la Skill

GitHub

name: long-term-impact-evaluation description: Choose methods for measuring long-term product impact after or beyond an A/B test. Use when comparing long-term holdbacks, post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, CLV models, delayed effects, short-term versus long-term metric tradeoffs, or lower-cost alternatives to long-term holdbacks. license: MIT compatibility: Codex, Claude Code, and other Agent Skills-compatible clients. metadata: version: "0.1.0" displayName: Long-Term Impact Evaluation category: Product Management tags: practical-ab-testing,next-level-ab-testing,ab-testing,experimentation,holdbacks

Long-Term Impact Evaluation

Use this skill to choose a practical method for measuring product impact beyond the initial experiment window. It compares long-term holdbacks, post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, and customer lifetime value models.

Source Traceability

Primary source: Next-Level A/B Testing by Leemay Nassery. Guidance is transformed and paraphrased from Chapter 8 on long-term impact, short-term and long-term metric relationships, holdbacks, post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, and CLV models.

Related skills:

  • holdback-experiment-design for detailed holdback planning.
  • trustworthy-experiment-insights for result credibility and false positives.
  • experimentation-strategy-roadmap for cost, quality, and complexity tradeoffs.

Reference Routing

NeedRead
Long-term evaluation conceptsreferences/core/knowledge.md
Method selection and risk rulesreferences/core/rules.md
Scenario examplesreferences/core/examples.md
Step-by-step method selectionworkflows/choose-long-term-evaluation.md

Workflow

  1. State why short-term experiment metrics are insufficient.
  2. Identify the expected time horizon and delayed mechanisms.
  3. Compare holdback, post-period analysis, continuous monitoring, and CLV model options.
  4. Weigh accuracy against user cost, business cost, complexity, and confounding.
  5. Choose the simplest method that answers the long-term question.
  6. Define metric cadence, interpretation limits, and follow-up decisions.

Output Format

# Long-Term Impact Evaluation Plan

## Long-Term Question
[What delayed or sustained effect must be measured.]

## Recommended Method
[Holdback | Post-period analysis | Continuous monitoring | CLV model | Hybrid]

## Tradeoffs
| Method | Benefit | Cost/Risk | Fit |
|--------|---------|-----------|-----|

## Measurement Plan
- Short-term metric:
- Long-term metric:
- Time horizon:
- Confounders:

## Decision Rules
- Continue measuring if:
- End or revise if:
- Escalate if:

Quality Bar

  • Do not create a long-term holdback when a lower-cost method can answer the decision well enough.
  • Do not use post-period analysis without accounting for external factors such as seasonality or campaigns.
  • Do not rely on CLV models without naming model drift and behavior-change risk.
  • Do not confuse continuous monitoring with causal long-term measurement.
Skills enregistrées